I suppose I'm feeding the troll, but sometimes it's fun.
As with every other human who utilizes technology my demands change along with my knowledge and needs.
You don't speak for me.
So, you're suggesting that you are stuck in a status quo never reaching for a better understanding or utilization of technology? That's a little bit sad.
Restrictive policies such as this one have always annoyed me,
You aren't getting auto-saved passwords. Hardly the same as a restrictive policy. Not allowing you to use Chrome at all would be a restrictive policy.
Interesting, Webster defines "restrict" as "a limitation on the use or enjoyment of property or a facility". I wonder what definition you are using?
Puh-lease. Force?
I wonder, do you find that alternate and sarcastic spellings of words are an adequate substitute for substantive content? I may or may not be wrong in this assertion (I don't think I am. The restriction of my actions are in many ways no less invasive in the digital world as the physical.), but you have given me no counter argument.
I find your responses to be juvenile and ineffective communication. I wonder what the point of your response was? I suppose it possibly was to annoy me or get a pat on the back from other apple apologists. It certainly wasn't to have a productive discussion on the issue at hand. Though, I believe the point is that apple does not have discussions on matters such as this one. They hand down edicts. And yes, as has been pointed out earlier, this has been an effective business strategy for them in the past.