Looks like no one’s replied in a while. To start the conversation again, simply ask a new question.

iTunes playback quality vs. Logic

Has anyone else noticed that audio played back with iTunes sounds slightly less good than with Logic ?

This is an issue that has bugged me over the course of several years, using multiple computers, audio interfaces, and apps. Maybe others have noticed, or have suggestions or insight ?

I'm talking about a VERY subtle difference in quality--the kind of thing you probably wouldn't notice except when listening carefully on a good playback system. The difference is subtle enough that I wouldn't even bother trying to hear it with my G4's built-in audio output, but I hear it with my MOTU 828mkII and my Digi 001, and I especially notice when I route digital output from those devices into a better D/A converter (UA 2192).

Here's the strange part: every attempt I've made to measure this difference has been unsuccessful. I've recorded the output of iTunes using AudioHijack, I've routed iTunes into Logic using Jack, and I've recorded the digital outputs of my interfaces into a DAT recorder. In all cases, I get a bit-for-bit identical copy of the starting file, yet I hear the subtle degradation while monitoring the recording (the resulting files sound great again when played back in Logic).

I've listened to this enough to be dead certain that I'm not imagining it, even though the digital data suggests otherwise...

My best guess is that I'm hearing jitter, that somehow, audio routed through the default audio path in OS X picks up a bit of timing jitter before it makes it to the audio driver, and this jitter is enough to degrade D/A performance, although it's not significant enough to cause digital recording mechanisms to glitch.

As best I can tell, this only happens with audio apps that output to the default audio of OS X. When I play back audio using Logic or ProTools (selecting my audio interface directly in the app's preferences), everything sounds great. But when I play back the same file using iTunes or Quicktime, routing it using Audio MIDI Setup or the Sound panel, it sounds slightly flat and grainy by comparison. Again, it's a really subtle difference, and I'm not doing anything overtly dumb like applying eq or "sound enhancement" with iTunes or anything like that--the digital output I capture, again, is identical. (Although, I will say that when I test the output of iTunes, I tend to get one small, inaudible (only noticed by bit-for-bit comparison) digital glitch every 5-10 minutes or so, while the output of Logic is 100% clean. This occasional bit error is clearly not the cause of the continuous sonic difference I'm noticing, but it adds to my suspicion that the overall bitstream is more jittery, which may affect D/A continuously, even though it seldom glitches completely.)

Does anyone know enough about the inner workings of the Apple HAL to know how routing audio through the default output might increase jitter, or otherwise sound slightly less good than audio directed straight to the interface driver via an app's preferences ? Anyone have tips on how to reduce jitter within Mac OS X ? I've tried renicing iTunes and CoreAudio to increase their priority, but it hasn't helped. Anyone know of a good jukebox app that has direct access to audio drivers ?

I'd sure like to be able to enjoy the convenience of iTunes without knowing that what I'm hearing would sound just ever-so-slightly better if I dragged all the files into Logic...

Thanks for indulging my audio neurosis!

James
james@nashvillain.com

Dual 1.25 G4 Mac OS X (10.4.8)

Posted on Dec 30, 2006 1:15 AM

Reply
19 replies

Feb 17, 2007 11:58 PM in response to jnashguitar

I have a similar question and went looking on the forums to see if anyone else had noticed inferior playback quality.

I was listening to a 128kbs MP3 of ABBA "SOS" which I had captured the audio from a DivX web player video stream.
http://stage6.divx.com/members/117172/videos/1014475

I noticed it sounded a little dull in iTunes, compared to when I was listening via the web page, so I revealed the location of the MP3 in the finder and played the MP3 with RealPlayer. I could definitely hear a difference. Played back with RealPlayer, the MP3 seems to have more "presence" and a brighter sound, than when played back via iTunes.

Mac Pro Mac OS X (10.4.8)

Mac Mini basic Mac OS X (10.3.8)

Feb 18, 2007 8:42 AM in response to iSAWaUFO

I was listening to a 128kbs MP3 of ABBA "SOS" which I
had captured the audio from a DivX web player video
stream.
I noticed it sounded a little dull in iTunes,


compared to when I was listening via the web page, so
I revealed the location of the MP3 in the finder and
played the MP3 with RealPlayer. I could definitely
hear a difference. Played back with RealPlayer, the
MP3 seems to have more "presence" and a brighter
sound, than when played back via iTunes


This is two completely different things. The OP is talking
about the difference between the Audio going through an
external interface and the internal audio engine (core audio).
This is also with uncompressed CD quality files.

You are dealing with a very compressed 128kps (yuk) mp3
file and both iTunes and Realplayer are using the same
way of playing the music (core audio)

Thus the only thing we can tell for sure in your situation
is that your listening to badly compressed audio through
two programs using the same driver. Which would lead us
to only one conclusion...

You have no taste in music or in the quality of it.

Feb 18, 2007 9:05 AM in response to Phillip K

You might have already checked this, but it's possible that the "Sound Enhancer" settings are turned on in iTunes. Check the Playback tab in the iTunes preferences. It's meant to be a kind of stereo enhancer. I don't like it at all, it really messes with the original stereo imaging. I'd imagine it could end up mucking with the higher frequencies, too, in effect dulling the sound.

Feb 18, 2007 10:48 AM in response to iSAWaUFO

I have a similar question and went looking on the
forums to see if anyone else had noticed inferior
playback quality.


I have not noticed.

I was listening to a 128kbs MP3 of ABBA "SOS" which I
had captured the audio from a DivX web player video
stream.
http://stage6.divx.com/members/117172/videos/1014475


Apples don't like Abba,didn't anyone tell you?

I noticed it sounded a little dull in iTunes,
compared to when I was listening via the web page, so
I revealed the location of the MP3 in the finder and
played the MP3 with RealPlayer. I could definitely
hear a difference. Played back with RealPlayer, the
MP3 seems to have more "presence" and a brighter
sound, than when played back via iTunes.


Realplayer can't tell it is an Abba song.iTunes don't like it,so it messes with it.

Cheers

Feb 22, 2007 12:44 AM in response to xs4is

I solved the mystery. Turns out it's because iTunes (with volume at full, no eq, and no audio processing) truly outputs a raw 16-bit stream, while Logic always outputs a dithered 24-bit stream.

With iTunes, a 16-bit CD gets played back with zeroes in the 8 least significant bits. Logic Pro, however, seems to convert everything to 32-bit float, then dithers to 24-bits, even if all faders are at unity and there's no processing being done. So when you use Logic to play a 16-bit file, you end up with some dither in the 8 bottom bits.

When I compared the digital outputs of iTunes and Logic and concluded they were identical, that was done by recording digitally to a 16-bit DAT machine. The outputs WERE identical to 16-bits, but the full 24-bit output was slightly different.

For whatever reason, some (all ?) 24-bit D/A converters don't seem to sound nearly as good with a truncated 16-bit input. That dither introduced by Logic makes a very noticeable improvement in the sound. I found I could replicate the effect in iTunes by routing output through Audio Hijack and inserting a 24-bit dither plug-in. Then Logic and iTunes sounded virtually identical. Problem solved!

I can't say that I understand why dithering 16-bit audio to 24-bits improves the D/A conversion, though. Typically, dither is used when decreasing wordlength, and it's very clear why using dither in this situation improves resolution. When the original source is 16-bit, though, I don't understand why dithering to 24-bits improves D/A conversion. Very clear from listening that it does, though. Anyone have an explanation ?

Hey, thanks for the advice, and maybe my discovery will be useful to others.

Feb 23, 2007 6:07 AM in response to jnashguitar

WHAT EVER YOU DO TO GET YOU MIX WORKING WHEN BOUCING TO ITUNES, I,LL SAYS THATS SO CRUEL!!
I KNOW IT WAS,NT LOGIC BUT WHY ADD THIS TO LOGI, AND THEN THE MIX COMES OUT SO DULL.
ITS JUST NOT FAIR, IS CRAZY, CARZY AND MORE CRAZY!!!!!!!!!!!!!
MOST OF US THAT DO MUSIC .
JUST WANT TO MAKE MUSIC AND NOT BECOME, ALBERT/EINSTEIN!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!, IT SHOULD BE STRAIGH FARWARD.
YOU KNOW HOW MUCH TIME MY MIX SOUNDS SO GO AND COMES OUT SO BAD IN QUALITY, MEANING REAL DULL.
LOGIC PLEASE FIX UP.
TIME IS MONEY, AND MONEY IS TIME, CUBASE ANY VERSION SOUNDS SO GOOD.
AND THAT DOES,NT MEAN I WANT TO USE CUBASE!!!!!!
ITS LOGIC PROOOOOOOOOOOOOOO.
PRO, PRO PRO.

Feb 24, 2007 12:04 PM in response to blayzay

I,LL
this needs a apostrophe mark not a comma
this is a coma , this is a apostrophe mark '

WAS,NT

same as above

LOGI

What is LOGI?


CARZY AND MORE

Some kind of comedy team?

STRAIGH
I think you forgot something here.

YOU KNOW HOW MUCH TIME MY MIX SOUNDS SO GO


Not really

AND COMES
OUT SO BAD IN QUALITY, MEANING REAL DULL.
LOGIC PLEASE FIX UP.


Fix what up?

TIME IS MONEY, AND MONEY IS TIME,


Nope two seperate songs.

CUBASE ANY VERSION
SOUNDS SO GOOD.


I am not going to touch this


AND THAT DOES,NT MEAN I WANT TO USE CUBASE!!!!!!


There you go again with the coma!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!



ITS LOGIC PROOOOOOOOOOOOOOO.
PRO, PRO PRO.


NOOOOOOOOOOOOO!

I think you need garageband.

You have not figured out how to communicate properly
when you make a post like this it is like saying
I am still in the third grade and have not figured out this
whole English/typing/grammer thing. If you are having
this much trouble just posting a few sentences, how can
you handle a complex program like Logic? You should
really consider that people judge by the image you portray.
If you want to be treated like an adult then make your
posts look like they are from an adult.
AND LAY OFf THE CAPS!

Feb 24, 2007 12:13 PM in response to jnashguitar

Jnash, the fact that you figured that out blows my mind. . . maybe its more simple that it sounds. . . but in my book you're a friggin genius. Anyway. . .

This may be a day late and a dollar short, but I've had similar problems with iTunes and playback discrepancies. This is with all EQ's in iTunes flat, sound enhancer off. . . just what I thought would be the track i just bounced from Logic into iTunes.

When iTunes plays back i never sounds quite the same to me. In Logic, I get my mixes sounding well balanced, well arranged, nothing running atop the other, but the biggest thing I notice is that when I bounce it out and play it back in iTunes, the vocals are always quieter. At least the ones panned dead center.

Since the majority of the world listens to their music on iTunes/iPod these days, should we be mixing for iTunes? How sad would that be. My theory is that somewhere in the stereo interleaved file, Perhaps left and right become somewhat out of phase in iTunes and cancel out a portion of the center channel. Who knows, this may not happen and may not be possible. But i notice anything panned center in the mix comes out sounding quiet in iTunes, but not in logic.

I've also noticed this with commercial tracks. If I dump them into logic, they sound amazing. Right when I listen to them in iTunes - vocals disappear. Not completely. . .but enough to make me wonder what the eff is up.

But yes Jnash, i've noticed other logic/iTunes playback discrepancies since day 1.

Feb 24, 2007 12:15 PM in response to LogicalAnalysis

that somewhere in the stereo interleaved file,
Perhaps left and right become somewhat out of phase
in iTunes and cancel out a portion of the center
channel.


Sorry, to everyone now who is going to fleece me for saying "center channel" (i can just hear it now. . . "There's no center channel in 2.0/2.1 stereo mixing!" Yeah, I know, I just misspoke) The stereo IMAGED center. . . there we go. . . i could just feel NoEq making fun of me for talking about a center channel in stereo mixing.

No crack on you NoEq, your posts are usually the ones that give me a good laugh on this forum. . .

Feb 24, 2007 7:17 PM in response to jnashguitar

That dither introduced by
Logic makes a very noticeable improvement in the
sound.

I can't say that I understand why dithering 16-bit
audio to 24-bits improves the D/A conversion, though.
Typically, dither is used when decreasing
wordlength, and it's very clear why using dither in
this situation improves resolution. When the
original source is 16-bit, though, I don't
understand why dithering to 24-bits improves D/A
conversion. Very clear from listening that it does,
though. Anyone have an explanation ?




Could it be the same reason that dithering helps in the
decreasing sceneario. Converting it to 32 floating bits
then "pushing the relavent signal" into the 24 bits
helps lower the signal to noise ratio. I am just guessing
but I do think that was a stroke of genius to figure that out.

iTunes playback quality vs. Logic

Welcome to Apple Support Community
A forum where Apple customers help each other with their products. Get started with your Apple ID.