elppA_ksA wrote:
That makes sense, but my only problem is battery usage, not sure about that yet
TLDR: I gained around 6 or 7 days per charge without Wi-Fi active
…
It's actually trivial to do battery tests. I did it myself, it just takes time, patience and a willingness to apply some basic scientific principles. I did it because I was tired of the lack of critical thinking posted on the internet, including this forum.
I used two iOS devices…
- Factory reset before testing
- SIMs were installed to activate but removed before the test, cellular data was off
- No Apple ID was setup
- Bluetooth off
- Sound muted
- No third party apps installed
- No apps running
- Charged fully via Apple USB charger, rebooted at start of test
- Screen set to maximum brightness, auto brightness disabled & both had same minimum display timeout
- Devices were not used beyond checking the battery level periodically
- Low power mode was not used
- Wi-Fi was not connected to any network - the device was only doing whatever it does when looking around for Wi-Fi
- Location services were active
I recorded battery percentage levels throughout the process.
Each device had a Wi-Fi on & a Wi-Fi off test.
NOTE: battery percentage figures can be unreliable, which is why the devices were used until they powered off.
Wi-Fi enabled
Device 1 10.2 days
Device 2 10.3 days
Wi-Fi disabled
Device 1 16.4 days
Device 2 17.6 days
I suspect that being connected to a Wi-Fi network causes more drain but didn't have the will to do that test too. I did passively watch the Wi-Fi traffic after completing the test, it substantially increases when connected to a network, hardly surprising.
I urge others to do their own tests before they repeat the same 'it makes no difference' mantra, simply thinking about physics should cause you to pause for thought (and seek out some actual data).
The laws of physics make it abundantly clear - transmitting radio takes energy, Apple are incredibly good at minimising battery use but the laws of physics have not been defeated.
As an aside: The 'LE' in Bluetooth LE stands for Low Energy, not No Energy.
P.S.
These are not some miraculous 15 day iPhones, both devices would sustain around 1 day of battery life under normal use, (checking mail, texting, browsing, audio playback). They had even shorter life when moving around using cellular, Wi-Fi, GPS etc.
They are old 3GS's running iOS 6.1.6 because that is all I had around, so if you have a newer device please post your results before you shoot down mine.
Sure 'things change' over time but last time I checked the laws of physics hadn't, if you have a newer device that proves battery is not affected by Wi-Fi please post results or send it to me for testing 😝
I would post the full data but I really don't feel like facing ridicule from the fans here. Sometimes I'm really depressed by the Apple mob mentality that is allowed and encouraged here. Take this post down moderators for being off topic if you want. I'm just trying to present some honest evidence not 'assumed facts'.

[right click and open in new window to be able to read the legend]