No, I refer to his idea that avoiding popular websites that many people use is viable.
By "his idea", are you referring to the initial response by macjack marked as Apple Recommended? If so, we all already know it is no longer a valid solution. It actually still is, but visiting any site that shows popup ads or cause redirects will immediately happen again. That point has been made abundantly clear over and over in this topic.
The third party apps have recently had an Apple-required lockdown to using only their own existing APIs, making them as useless as the included pop up blocker in safari.
And Microsoft has APIs that lock programmers to the way their OS works. As does Linux, Android and every other OS you can think of. Don't know why you think singling Apple out is a valid argument.
I simply stated they could provide users with better tools to do so on their own devices.
Why reinvent the wheel? There are already plenty of tools to block ads with in the App Store. I use AdGuard on all my Apple devices. It doesn't slow them down one whit. Actually, they're much faster online with the ad blocker installed since they aren't wasting bandwidth and time downloading ads.
As an "avid PC user", did you not learn ways to protect your information without beating yourself in the head, or was it too much to ask that you educate yourself a bit about the device you were using?
Ah, right to the insults. As Socrates said, 'When the debate is lost, slander becomes the tool of the loser.'
Of course I educated myself on the issue, and still do. It got very old constantly protecting the Swiss Cheese OS that is Windows. But even that isn't the main reason I switched to Macs. I'm in the electronic prepress industry, where it is still heavily Mac based. If you want to engage your clients in a fluid workflow, you use the same tools they are.
There's no need to be derogatory or demeaning.
Says the person being derogatory and demeaning.
Clearly my first response to Lawrence was meant tongue in cheek,
It obviously wasn't clear, or you wouldn't have gotten the response you did. I read your first post again just to see if it could be read differently. It couldn't. You were being quite dismissive, as shown in this next clip of text out of your own post:
You're helping to keep this thread alive by belligerence alone, and I assure you that is a quick path to burnout. You seem like a fairly knowledgeable (if annoyingly "appleogistic") person
If Lawrence, myself or others sound short at times, it's because we're getting sick of people jumping in based on the first page alone of this topic and spouting the same nonsense that, "It doesn't work!". And there you were, throwing out the same tired fanboi baloney, (if annoyingly "appleogistic") in your first post of this topic. But sure, we're the ones being rude.
Android users may experience similar issues, but at least they provide users with the means to solve them,
May? They do. So does every single other person who uses the Internet from literally any device or OS.
not just suggesting they grab some unknown third-party app that may or may not work while sucking up resources.
And if Apple were to write something included with Safari, that wouldn't suck up resources? Any app, no matter how small, uses resources. The only time it doesn't is if it isn't running.