Glyn & et.al,
I'm relatively new to the forums & essentially an amatuer at configuring systems, but was looking for some help. I have searched around a bit & found quite a few threads in which you or 'Tesserac' seem to have a good understanding of how to set things up. I've also been trying to find a few answers, and while some of my issues are mentioned in other threads, it's only in passing - so I apologize if these questions should start another thread. Questions 1&2 may not be directly related, but I think you could help w/#3.
Q#1 - security - when running an Airport base station in bridge mode, are you restricted to WEP level of security or can you still use WPA & WPA2? I've read in other forums but cannot confirm that in bridge mode you are restricted to WEP.
Q#2 - security - when running an Airport Express as part of a WDS, are you restricted to WEP security?
Why this is important - I live in an area filled with multiple networks - I'm looking at setting up two networks, a b/g network for printer sharing and Air tunes to multiple USB speakers as well as an old Powerbook & friends w/b&g laptops, as well as a separate 'n' network for a new/on order iMac & an Apple TV. Would like as high a level of security as possible. Am also looking a eventually running Airtunes through some speakers in the garage which is quite far away.
Q#3 - transfer speeds - Did you notice a drop in speed when you changed from sharing the internet connection via the AEBS(b/g) to sharing the internet connection via the AEBS(n)? I've read elsewhere that there is a hit on speed when using Internet sharing via the WAN.
http://www.macintouch.com/reviews/airportn/
In our testing, AirPort Extreme provides outstanding 802.11n performance through its LAN ports. However, when using Internet Sharing (also known as NAT, or Network Address Translation, mode), throughput via the WAN uplink port drops considerably. We observed a maximum speed of 34 Mbit/sec. in this configuration. While this is faster than a typical cable modem or DSL line, it's considerably slower than a switched 100 Mbit Fast Ethernet connection.
Also,
http://discussions.apple.com/thread.jspa?messageID=4285079�
Have you or others seen this to be true/if so would your original set up be quicker?
Why this is important: one could set up a separate 'n' network just for file transfers btwn 'n' clients - iMac & Apple TV & ethernet linked media server, and btwn a new Macbook Pro (that has more power for transcoding files than the iMac) and the iMac. While it would restrict the Macbook Pro to b/g speeds while browsing the net, that is not as big an issues - the bottleneck @ this time is the ISP.
Q#4 - Hardware/transfer speeds in the network - what would be faster - an external HD firewired to a client vs. an ethernet linked media server?
It seems that some of you have played with both - right now I have my iTunes library on an external firewired WD HD and I use SuperDuper for smart backups to an identical external HD. However, I'm approaching 500 GB of media files and was wondering should I just continue to buy larger Firewire drives vs. invest in a ethernet enabledHD/media server. If so, what are good options - this has been asked before, but no real answers/everything I have found on the web appears to be based on Windows Server
Q#5: Signal str
2003.
iMac G5 + Macbook Mac OS X (10.4.7)
iMac G5 + Macbook Mac OS X (10.4.7)