Logic Score to Finale import working better now

For all you Score nuts out there, if you save a Score file as PDF, open in the PDFtoMusic Pro, v.1.0.3, then Import into Finale, you will get much more realistic results then a few months ago.

Their update has improved the recognition of at least 30% more music within a PDF file than before making Finale a much more compatible link to Logic.

Dual 2.0 G5, 4GB RAM; MacBook Pro, 2GB RAM Mac OS X (10.4.9)

Posted on Apr 24, 2007 8:36 AM

Reply
11 replies

Apr 24, 2007 8:51 AM in response to William Levine

thanks for the info wilhelm, dankeschön.

this makes finale/logic combination seem like a great way to go - at least i assume the PDFtomusic is finale only? or can it be used with sibelius?

what then, would be your workflow and general context for using this?

i am imagining working with logic to create a score with general markings; slurs, crescendi, marks of expression, stoccato etc, as well as the editing of the overall structure. then bringing the score via pdf into finale for fine tuning and creating notation that logic can't do as easily; feathered beams, complex polyrhythms.

it's a long while since i used finale seriously - how does the part management compare to logics? i really like logics part management (limitations not withstanding) and sibelius has excellent part management. so excellent in fact that that is the direction i will go if logic doesn't have its act sorted out sufficiently by the time i do my next concert score.

i realize that for orchestrators this will be invaluable. can you give some insights as to how a film composer that does most of his own orchestrating might use this? ie how fast is it? caveats? general comments?

Apr 24, 2007 9:07 AM in response to Rohan Stevenson1

Thanks, Rohan. Any program that imports xml files can use this.

I would change my workflow as an orchestrator like this:

√ Starting in Logic, I would take a second more than usual to quantize difficult passages. This is a step one always should do before importing to Finale. But now, PDFtoMusic makes this step much less time consuming.

√ I would no longer add dynamics, slurs, crescendi, chords, lyrics, etc in Logic. Finale handles this more elegantly and efficiently. The idea is just to get the notes/ midi data from Logic. If I get a midi file from someone, I would open it up in Logic first if it's not quantized. Logic plus PDF astually makes a much better way to import unquantized music into Finale.

√ In Logic, save as PDF, open in PDFtoMUsic Pro, and it automatically exports to XML. (you can tweak the prefs there)

√ Open in Finale and have access to all it's superior features.

With superior key commands and print out, this is the most pro choice. If you're on an orchestration team, this is the only choice. Finale 2007 now has the same part management as Sibelius.

Apr 24, 2007 9:28 AM in response to William Levine

With superior key commands and print out, this is the most pro choice. If you're on an orchestration team, this is the only choice. Finale 2007 now has the same part management as Sibelius.


...and finale is £200 cheaper too.

but will the pdf reader interpret the markings? what if there was a score partly made up in logic? we can to a certain extent prepare midi files in logic and bring them in to finale already, although the pdf route means you will have less faffing trying to make the export work right.

there are neat tricks with logic with regards to markings and expression etc that i would really miss - remember for 90% of my work it is all about speed. i want to get some sleep before the session is due to start....

Apr 24, 2007 9:37 AM in response to William Levine

Thanks for this update William. Looks like this will be the way to go for me as well. Looks like learning Finale will be my summer project after all.

Rohan, regarding how PDFtoMusic interpets graphics, have a look at this thread:

http://discussions.apple.com/thread.jspa?messageID=4084019

Scroll down until you see an image of a score (it's the thing that has lots of black dots on it). : - ) That image is a test I made showing how PDFtoMusic interperted a Logic score printout; it did a fabulous job.

Apr 24, 2007 1:01 PM in response to iSchwartz

The dynamics seem to be interpreted fine. And the crescendi. But I'd stay away from slurs and articulations.

I just prefer the way Finale handles dynamics and articulation.

Finale has greatly improved since the early days, the simle entry palette takes a few hours to learn and is much more intuitive.

I checked for accuracy, and when the Logic file make it to Finale, all the notes are accurate, the exception being very complex piano music.

If only Finale has Logic's brilliant "Select Similar" command and "Align Objects command." But in terms of speed, Logic may still be the way to go.

Apr 24, 2007 2:04 PM in response to Ashermusic

Hey Jay,
I already bought an early version of Finale so it made sense to upgrade. The top teams in LA are using it, and Joanne Kane Music prints out parts on it, so they like to get scores in Finale. Sibelius is definitely sexier.

The new version is much easier than before, though many things are still obfuscated and concealed. I'd love to see Apple fix that program and turn it into iScore or something....

Apr 24, 2007 2:23 PM in response to Ashermusic

Hi Asher,

I've seen many more scores produced in Finale than I have seen produced in Sibelius, but my general impression of scores prepared in the latter is that they seemed kinda "junky-looking". Admittedly I'm giving Sibelius short shrift by not researching better examples of its output, and by mentioning Finale in my post I'm not suggesting my endorsement of one over the other. Truth be told, I should probably investigate both programs before jumping in for either one.

I'm also a bit of a tweakhead/perfectionist, and advice offered by several people whose opinions I respect have suggested Finale over Sibelius to satisfy my tweaking needs. Oh, that doesn't sound good, does it?

: - )

-=iS=-

Apr 25, 2007 2:28 AM in response to Ashermusic

i have about the same level of familiarity with both. to me, logics own score editor is most similar to finale. for getting started, double clicking on a score object will bring up its relevant editor in finale whereas you have to hunt around less than intuitive menus in sibelius. i don't like the sibelius naming conventions very much - by that i mean where you find an action and what it actually does.

its six of one, half dozen of another though, because i am sure once you are really use to a program it is hard to imagine any other way of doing something. look at how PT savy people grumble about logic or vice versa.

actually, aside from bugs, i think once you understand a couple of core principles with logics notator that can be written into one simple pargraph, logic is probably the most intutive. its just a little...ahh...unfinished.

sibelius is by far more popular over this side of the pond than finale, but i may well end up going for it along with iS as well. simple cost benefit. i don't really need finale all that often and i can get so far in logic already. its absolutely touch and go as to whether it is worth it. besides, who knows where logic may go in the future? word on the street is the next release well be a big one with lots of changes. perhaps it will be a sign of things to come.

so i could buy finale and invest the time to really nail it and in a years time find that logic has caught up so much i end up prefering to keep everything in that. its one of the things that irritates me most in life. you buy something you partially need and end up having it superceded by something more practical in a few months time.

Apr 25, 2007 8:52 AM in response to Rohan Stevenson1

i have about the same level of familiarity with both.
to me, logics own score editor is most similar to
finale. for getting started, double clicking on a
score object will bring up its relevant editor in
finale whereas you have to hunt around less than
intuitive menus in sibelius.


Actually they fixed this in the new Simple Editor: clicking does bring up the relevant menu, making Finale much more easy to use. I would never call it intuitive, but they have thought a great deal through since this is their main app.

its six of one, half dozen of another though, because
i am sure once you are really use to a program it is
hard to imagine any other way of doing something.
look at how PT savy people grumble about logic or
vice versa.

actually, aside from bugs, i think once you
understand a couple of core principles with logics
notator that can be written into one simple pargraph,
logic is probably the most intutive. its just a
little...ahh...unfinished.


Yes, Logic still wins for intuitiveness.

The ONLY reason I taught myself Finale is that Logic has not caught up to Finale. Logic is a like a multi tool for everyone. Finale is one thing. Plus it's the Hollywood industry and academic standard in America.

Once I got into it, it was actually refreshing to have so many features missing in Logic. But there are many times I am incredulously thinking, why can't it simply do so and so like Logic?!?!

Mr. Asher, I am not a Sibelius user, though on the surface it looks better designed. But I have heard that it's like a sexy woman, seductive, but then you see the limitations of your superficial relationship. The Finale forums discuss this in great detail.

http://forum.makemusic.com/default.aspx?f=6

This thread has been closed by the system or the community team. You may vote for any posts you find helpful, or search the Community for additional answers.

Logic Score to Finale import working better now

Welcome to Apple Support Community
A forum where Apple customers help each other with their products. Get started with your Apple Account.