Memory: Single-Rank, Dual-Rank, what?

I was wondering if someone could please clear up some confusion for me. I've been looking into getting a 4x 1 GB FB-Dimm package from vendors such as Ramjet.com, Otherworldcomputing.com, Datamemorysystems.com...etc., and some of these sites list their memory as Dual Rank.

Now, I've read articles and have sent questions to some of these vendors asking if their FB-Dimms are Dual Rank or not and some of the information they have sent me regarding Dual Rank memory seems to be conflicting. and even some review sites such as Anandtech.com that say Dual-Rank memory is preferable and will see performance boosts (Anandtech.com article linked here: http://www.anandtech.com/mac/showdoc.aspx?i=2832).

Here are a couple of replies I got from John Mayer from Ramjet.com after asking whether or not their memory they sell for the Mac Pro is dual rank or not.:

"Brian,
Al of the different FB-DIMMs that we sell for the Mac Pro are single
rank. There are dual rank modules out on the market for a lower
price, but they are not recommended for use in the Mac Pro."

and this one after I copy/pasted him to a passage from the Anandtech article (the portion where Anandtech states Dual Rank if preferable):

"Brian,
I don't know where that text came from but it is incorrect (perhaps
they are confusion dual rank with dual pair). The Mac Pro has 8
slots, and is capable of addressing 8 ranks. Therefore, if you
install 4x dual-rank modules, you will be using up all 8 ranks, and
you will not be able to install any further RAM (i.e. the remaining 4
slots must be left open). This is why Apple specifically recommends
against using dual rank modules.

John"


So which is it? Is the term Dual Rank being used erroneously by some of the vendors and review sites out there or is Dual Rank really what I want contrary to what John from Ramjet.com told me? I'm looking to get the best performance out of my Mac Pro.

Mac Pro 2.66Ghz, Mac OS X (10.4.9)

Posted on May 14, 2007 11:43 AM

Reply
7 replies

May 15, 2007 11:13 AM in response to William Robinson

Looks like Steve from Ramjet has cleared up all the confusion for me in the following email I received from him:

"Sir:

My name is Steve Moberley, and I am a tech here at Ramjet. Unfortunately, I am also the source of the bad information you received about our 1GB FB-DIMMs for your Mac Pro. I was engaged in other activities when John asked me about the ranking issue, and I gave the correct response, only it was for the wrong machine!



I have read the articles you forwarded to John Mayer, and yes, definitely the dual rank is preferable in the Mac Pro.



I sincerely apologize for causing this problem. At Ramjet we pride ourselves on being a definitive source for information about all Macs, and I really dropped the ball on this one. I’ll definitely be more careful in the future.



Our 1GB, 2GB, and 4GB modules are dual rank (a single rank module would be significantly more expensive), and always have been. You can populate your machine with any paired combination of our 512mb, 1GB, 2GB, or 4GB modules without any problems. The 512mb modules are single rank modules.



I can forward you a copy of our manufacturer’s complete technical specifications for the 1GB modules you received, if you would like. It’s a Word document and is six or seven pages long. I am not aware of anywhere within Mac OS where it will state whether the installed modules are single or dual rank.



Apologies again, and thanks for your business!



Steve Moberley

www.ramjet.com

1-800-831-4569"

Thank you all for your feedback!

This thread has been closed by the system or the community team. You may vote for any posts you find helpful, or search the Community for additional answers.

Memory: Single-Rank, Dual-Rank, what?

Welcome to Apple Support Community
A forum where Apple customers help each other with their products. Get started with your Apple Account.