I had an associate ask me why I use the intermediate step of putting
patch names into a spreadsheet and I thought that other people would
like to know why I suggest this.
When copying out of the PDF file I used from Yamaha (on some banks)
it was impossible to get all 128 names of one bank to highlight at one time.
I had success with the first bank but as you can see the PDF had 3 columns
on each page with 2 columns making up one 128 patch bank. This meant
that the 2nd bank started on one page and ended up on another. Since you
have to paste all 128 names at one time you cant do one half and then the
other, you have to do all 128 at the same time. The problem comes in this
PDF when you start on a third column and try to continue highlighting into
the next page.
As you can see there are two words of non relevant text that
get highlighted with the patch names. These two words are
inserted into the list throwing off the remaining 64 names and
make that bank only half accurate.
Using a spread sheet and making the columns 128 cells long allows
you to cut and paste as many parts of the bank as you need to and use
as many pieces to put the whole bank together, then, when you are
finished getting the whole bank put together you can just highlight the
whole bank from the spreadsheet and copy and paste it in
one fell swoop into Logics patch list.
Not the most elegant way to do this but practical since I just did not want
to type 500+ names individually into Logic.
Since I had only this one PDF to go by, I thought I should add the note
that if your synth manufacturer does not use this format and you can copy
all 128 names of each bank at one time (without any non relevant text
getting in the way) then you can bypass the spreadsheet because then
it would be unnecessary.
Dual Processor 1.8 G5,2GB Ram Barely limping along on an old outdated OS Mac OS X (10.4.8) Logic Pro 7.2.3 RME Fireface800 Peak Pro5.2