What Is Equivalent Of DOS and Apple use?

Sorry if this strange question should be in another forum but I couldn't figure out where best to ask it.

I am needing to define DOS:

(1) Is there any comparable function in OS X? Is it similar to working in Terminal?

(2) Did the early Apple's run DOS. If so was it the MicroSoft one, or a different variation?

Thanks,
Tony

eMac G4 + iBook 12 inch G3 (10.3.9 on both) + iPod 5th Generation 60 GB, Mac OS X (10.3.9), PowerPC G4 1 GHz 1 GB SDRAM + (iBook) PowerPC G3 500 MHz 384 MHz SDRAM

Posted on Jun 6, 2007 10:08 PM

Reply
16 replies

Jun 7, 2007 8:26 AM in response to artistjoh

DOS (for IBM PCs) and Apple DOS are 2 different things.

Microsoft wrote/bought MS-DOS. They didn't buy it from Apple, they bought it from Seattle Computer Products (it was called QDOS at the time). Apple wrote Apple DOS.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apple_DOS
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DOS

Apple DOS hasn't been used since the Apple ][

Underlying OS X is BSD Unix. You can liken BSD Unix to a tank, and MS-DOS to a pinto.

Jun 6, 2007 10:18 PM in response to artistjoh

DOS= disk operating system

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MS-DOS

Apple uses Unix as of OS X.

Prior to OS X, apple used a different, non-dos operating system. Dos I believe is unique to microsoft.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unix


You access unix via the terminal. There is some sort of DOS shell on windoze. There is a very superficial resemblance, sort of like the resemblance of human English to the gruntings of paleolithic cave-men. Only Noam Chomsky can detect the similarities in linguistic structures.

Jun 7, 2007 1:01 AM in response to artistjoh

Here's the skinny on Apple & MS:

Back when the Apple II existed (many years ago), Microsoft wrote the Integer BASIC language that preceded Applesoft BASIC. Apple's in those days did use a Disk Operating System, but it was written by Apple. That DOS made it to version 3.3 before Apple replaced it with ProDOS.

Microsoft did write some early Mac software, most notably Microsoft Word (which was originally a Mac program, believe it or not). However, Apple and MS parted ways shortly after that and MS created DOS (or more accurately, bought it) and licensed it to IBM for the IBM PC as PC-DOS. Later on, the "PC" was dropped and it just became MS-DOS when the PC clones came along.

Does that clear it up a bit?

Jun 7, 2007 3:30 AM in response to KonKrypton

Kon,
This is most interesting. If I understand you correctly, DOS was written by Apple without MicroSoft help, it was used on Apple ][ and that at some time MicroSoft purchased it from Apple and Apple developed another version called ProDOS.

Did ProDOS ever make it as far as the first Macintosh computers?

And did MicroSoft rewrite the DOS they purchased to upgrade it for IBM?

I find this quite fascinating. The histories of DOS I find on the net all start with DOS being created specifically for IBM by MicroSoft.

Jun 7, 2007 11:26 AM in response to artistjoh

Jeff is correct - while MS-DOS was purchased (mostly, I'm sure they did some polish on it) it wasn't bought from Apple. In fact the Apple DOS was not invented until the Disk II drive was released. Prior to the Disk II, Apple II's read programs from (wait for it) a CASSETTE tape drive! Just a plain old cassette drive.

When the Disk II was released Apple realized there was no native support for it, so the Disk Operating System (literally, a system for operating the disk drive) was released along with it.

And yes, CP/M was already in existence (I actually worked for a company that used Apple II's with Z80 processor cards installed so they could run CP/M) and almost all of MS-DOS's commands are, quite literally, the same, including the backward slash in path names.

ProDOS was never used on Macs, the Mac OS (System 1) was created for the Mac. However, ProDOS was the basis for GSOS, the Mac-style OS that the Apple II GS ran.

I was lucky enough to be there when the Apple II, IIGS and Mac were first sold and experienced most of this stuff first hand. 🙂

Jun 7, 2007 1:23 PM in response to KonKrypton

Thank you guys for explaining this all so well, I appreciate it.

Kon, I am not so sure I envy you those early Apples, as someone who is native to OS X whenever I am forced to use OS 9 I find it pretty much a nightmare at every stage, and then it goes and freezes all the time. I don't know how you guys survived it all. In fact you will hate me for saying this, but OS 9 is similar to me (as an "outsider" to the OS) to Windows I have a PC with Windows 2000 on it and I hate using it for the similar difficulties it gives me as the OS 9 does.

I am sure that as someone experienced with early Apples you would see it very differently.

Thank you for your generous help.

Tony

Jun 8, 2007 1:52 AM in response to artistjoh

Well, if you're running OS 9 apps in "classic" mode, it's not quite the same as running OS 9. As the "bridge" OS between the old Mac OS and OS X, OS 9 had a few problems. Most notably, it had the ability to support multiple users, but some programs still assumed you were the lone user of the machine.

No, it doesn't bother me that you prefer OS X! I'd think you were nuts if you didn't! Most of what wound up as OS X was the NeXT OS. I'm really glad we're on a unix-based OS now, it makes life so much easier.

But I can't help but be nostalgic about the "good ol' days" and my early Apple computers. At the time, they were the bomb!

Here's a laugh for you - my first modem as a 300 baud (compare that to 56k baud). You could literally read the text coming across the screen as it came in from the modem!

Jun 8, 2007 10:12 AM in response to artistjoh

The reason that OS9 can freeze is that programs can overwrite memory that is not "theirs", it runs in a non-protected memory management mode.

Apple had a project, Copeland, I believe, (or was it BH Astronomer 8^)?) that tried to kludge memory management onto MacOS [7, IIRC]. It never saw the light of day. Steve Jobs came back to Apple and made the tough, but correct IMHO, decision to scrap MacOS and port NextOS into darwin and OSX.

Jun 8, 2007 3:24 PM in response to Ken Nellis

Thanks, Ken, I didn't know that. Although, I too worked on larger computers and I know that they had both floppy and hard disk drives long before personal computers existed.

I worked with a Sperry/Univac that had an 8" floppy drive! It was mounted vertically in the console (like a toaster). The whole machine (console, disk packs, and tape drive) was about 15 feet long and had 4 mb of memory. This was circa 1986, and the machine wasn't new then.

This thread has been closed by the system or the community team. You may vote for any posts you find helpful, or search the Community for additional answers.

What Is Equivalent Of DOS and Apple use?

Welcome to Apple Support Community
A forum where Apple customers help each other with their products. Get started with your Apple Account.