Newsroom Update

Apple and Google deliver support for unwanted tracking alerts in iOS and Android. Learn more >

Looks like no one’s replied in a while. To start the conversation again, simply ask a new question.

Here is why the activations are delayed.....ATT nor APPL to blame.

i work for att. i got an iphone last night as well and mine activated instantly...but i live in oklahoma, fewer people, fewer activations, fewer problems. okay whenever a new cellular phone is activated it is programmed through a computer and then sent to a piece of hardware called a "switch." think of a switch as a turnstall at a fair or a revolving door at a hotel. only one actication can go through the switch at a time, any other activations behind it are waiting in line like people at a ticket counter. activations aren't the only things that have to go through the switch. anytime you call in to your cell provider and make an account change such as adding/removing a feature, changing a rate plan, activating a new sim, anything like that, it goes through a switch.

sometimes, there are natural switch delays. it doesn't happen daily because in a matter of odds, thousands of people won't be making account changes simultaniously everyday. however, sometimes this happens and it creates a delay in the switch. when this happens, we alert our customers of the delay and advise them to wait a few hours, power cycle and try again. switch delays aren't a daily occourence, but not rare. now, lets talk about the iphones and switch delays.

the iphone is undoubtedly THE biggest thing to ever happen to a cellular industry. last night, hundreds of thousands of people purchased iphones at the EXACT same time, rushed home and tried to activate their phones asap. what happened was a massive bombarding of activations to switches that generally don't handle anything near last night's load. since the phones were sold at 6:00, everyone got home at about 7:00 and most likely overloaded the switches to the point of near exhaustion! it would be like 30,000 or so people throwing basketballs at one hoop and hoping to make it in! theoretically, larger metropolitan areas would have more problems due to more switch activity. granted our switches in new york city are heavy duty, but there are no switches in existance designed to handle that kind of load because with the exception of this weekend, there would never be that much activity!

is it apples fault? no, i think that their activation through itunes is ingenious. it keeps people from having to call into att and it was FAR less painless than in-store account set up! is it att's fault? no. they can't be blamed for overloaded switches due to iphones WILD success. our switches are adequate, it's just that this weekend was a rare-bird exception that would have dang-near blown out any switch. it was like christmas day X 100! i think that i got mine activated so soon because we got from the store to my house in about 20 minutes and completed the activation before the swarm began to get into full swing. so those of you who are still waiting, just hang in there! just think of your activation as being in line for a rollercoaster. you are 3/4 closer to the front than you were last night! having had over 24 hours to mess with this phone, i can assure you that it is well worth the wait. it's the most marvelous piece of technology i've ever had the pleasure of using.

i'm sorry to all of those who aren't active yet, but hang in there! your hour will come. i bet those switches are like hot stove-tops right now begging for a chance to breathe. it's like pouring liquid thorugh a funnel, pouring faster will just cause an overflow, gravitiy has to take it's course! it's not att's fault, it's just the hundreds of thousands of activations fighting for the chance to make that first call! hang in there.



24 imac Mac OS X (10.4.10)

Posted on Jul 1, 2007 1:34 AM

Reply
155 replies

Jul 2, 2007 12:37 PM in response to Ronda Wilson

at 40 years old and being in the tech industry as a newtork admin, working on high I/O servers daily, I can honestly say there is no one else to blame BUT AT&T.
Sure, it will pass. But even AT&T themselves had a meeting about how many users they were going to irritate before things calmed down.
They knew it would happen. As did Apple.
Mine, no prob with, activated immediately and happily using it all weekend. To those that this didnt occour for, i feel your pain, and absolutely you should get your activatin fee waived and complain as loudly as you can.
Gee, I wonder if my old boss at AT&T would hire me back now??? 🙂

Jul 2, 2007 12:44 PM in response to anitas anger

Anitas,
I'm sorry but I have to disagree with your explanation. I agree that it would be foolish for a company to massively upgrade their hardware infrastructure for a one time event. The only problem is - This wasn't a hardware issue! The switches that handle the over-the-air activations we working fine (at least in my area Northern NJ). Plenty of people were able to buy an iPhone on Saturday and activate it immediately as a new account with a brand new number. Additionally, existing AT&T customers old SIM cards were deactivated and the new SIMs started working within minutes of the initial iTunes activation request. Also, if existing customers viewed their account information page on the AT&T website the data plans and visual voicemail codes were being added to their accounts.

The delays seemed to be caused by one of two problems: either 1) the customer was porting a number from another carrier, which just takes time since the old carrier must first release the number.

or

2) The customer was keeping an existing AT&T number and when the activation request was sent from iTunes to AT&T something wasn't exactly perfect and the automated system (if one even existed for these customers) failed to activate the phone.

There are reps available when you call the iPhone activation number that can activate the phone immediately if all of the account information is ok simply by clicking a button. So why were people being told they had to wait? Simple, AT&T simply didn't train enough of their staff to handle the amount of "problem" activations. When they started to get flooded with calls on Friday night they brought in additional staff to help handle the call load. If you are lucky enough to call and get one of the "trained" reps, they will simply review your account, make any corrections and click Activate. Otherwise you get the "You just have to wait until the email arrives" response.

So who is to blame? well that depends on which category you are in... If you were porting a number from another carrier and they were being slow about releasing the number then you really can't blame Apple or AT&T, except to say that AT&T should have informed people upfront that this may take some time, or atleast send an email letting the customer know that the number hadn't been released. If you were an existing customer and just waiting on a human to review your activation and click ok then the blame falls squarely on the shoulders of AT&T. It would not have cost them millions in hardware for a one time event, instead it would have only cost them to properly train more of their support staff (who ended up answering the phones anyway without actually being able to help).

Bill

Jul 2, 2007 12:49 PM in response to markdr

The report is that AT & T/Apple outsourced the activation process (maybe just so they could blame it on the outsourced firm).

The reports are that sales were anticipated of 200,000 phones over the weekend; in actuality they sold 500,000.
Honestly, I don't see how it could have gone any smoother than it did, all things considered.
I, too, have sympathy for those who were the exception and not the norm.

Jul 2, 2007 1:27 PM in response to wmandra

The report is that AT & T outsourced the activation process (maybe just so they could blame activation problems on the outsourced firm, Synchronoss).

The reports are that sales were anticipated of 200,000 phones over the weekend; in actuality they sold 500,000.

The percentage of problems is low, but that's no consolation if you're one of the unlucky ones.

Honestly, I don't see how it could have gone any smoother than it did, all things considered. I can't think of another event with which to compare it.

Jul 2, 2007 1:46 PM in response to Gary Lewis

Gary, I really don't know what happened but obviously, you know and I know it can't possibly be the switches. Anitas brought up some good points and she clearly knows how a call is routed but, she went out on a limb saying it got bottlenecked at the switch. That didn't happen.

My wait for the iPhone is going to be a number of years I'm afraid, if at all. (I just jumped in on the post because I wanted to share the information.) If I were ever going to spend that kind of money on a phone they better be offering some serious bandwidth with all features unlocked. But my biggest diversion is I like choice, not being rat holed into one carrier....

But I gotta hand it to them, it's a nice piece of hardware.

Jul 2, 2007 1:56 PM in response to theamazin

I have been waiting for 48+ hours and its still not activated. Initially AT&T had issues with activation, but they resolved everything in 10 hours and eversince I am waiting for Apple to activate the phone in their system. I have called Apple customer care and have been put on hold for almost 2 hours and yet in the end I was told they are experiencing atleast 3 days waiting period. When I requested them to give it to me in writing the agent refused to process my call any further. I am really disappointed with Apple and their response. They knew how many systems they were selling on the first day and should have had the IT system to support all those new activations. There is absolutely no excuse for such a badly executed product launch by both AT&T and Apple.



iPhone 8 GB

Jul 2, 2007 2:03 PM in response to Ronda Wilson

I agree AT&T cannot increase its capacity for one event, but Apple and AT&T could have limited the release of phones and come up with a more systematic activation process where every person was given a realistic activation time of one week and not 3 minutes to 6 hours maximum. Who ever came with the maximum 6 hours activation time should have looked into all the logistics aspects. And yes, I am talking after the number was ported, so you cant blame other service providers for not releasing the number and causing delays.

Jul 2, 2007 3:02 PM in response to medice18b

I left this thought in another thread but I it applies to this one too ...
According to the latest figures out there approximately 525,000 iPhones were sold over the weekend, and 2% of the buyers had trouble with the activation which on the one hand sounds like very little, but on the other that means that 10,500 of you had trouble which I am sure is way more than Apple intended.
I still want one no question about it ... a friend of mine got one and was one of the 98% and he is in love with the thing.
This is after all, version 1.0 of something different for both companies, so implementing the activation at a 100% success rate was probably never a realistic dream, and I don't doubt that a lot of the suggestions pouring forth will be in future upgrades to the iPhone's software.
So try to hang in there ... I hope you get hooked up very soon.

Jul 2, 2007 3:15 PM in response to anitas anger

Yeah, that is a nice explanation of what happened BUT

ATT knew this was coming.. they could have built in some temporary bandwidth.. it is only THE most high profile event ever in their history. Anyone with any experience in the telecom/internet world knows that you must be able to anticipate your user number and try to ramp up for that.. Maybe they did and it wasn't enough? Still no excuse..

This is like having a concert with a huge band and having no security presence to help control it.. they knew it was coming and did nothing about it. And you have the nerve to say it wasn't ATT's fault? Yeah.

Jul 2, 2007 6:09 PM in response to Lovin' Life

I have to wait until they have some serious muscle with regard to the following:

1. An app that will truly handle corporate e-mail, calendaring, and tasks... such as Lotus Notes or Exchange in a push fashion.
2. A multiprotocol chat client that also supports Sametime (like Adium).
3. A M$ Office equivalent (at least Word and Excel) app that can not only read, but create docs.

... just to name a few.

I have all this on Blackberry right now. So, going to iPhone would be somewhat of a step backwards in terms of functionality. The iPhone cool factor just doesn't outweigh the lack of functionality for me at this particular time. But, I suspect it will be forthcoming. I already know of one company that will be supporting iPhone and Lotus Notes & Exchange. I'm sure there will be others on the other items, as well.

I'm just having to curb my "gadget ****" right now... which is not easy for me.

Jul 2, 2007 7:56 PM in response to anitas anger

I have a question for you...since you work for AT&T, and if you're willing to answer...

I too have an iPhone but I can't get a signal where I live. I get a signal down the street (about 2/10 of a mile) but not at my house. I live on a hill which I've learned is a problem for AT&T GSM. I purchased a repeater antenna, installed it, but the signal didn't change. I actually don't get any signal bars at home when it is communicating to AT&T but most of the time it just says, "no service." I called AT&T customer service. The phone service rep reported the problem and said to call back in 24-48 hours if it isn't any better... She had nothing else to offer.

Is there something else? Is there an alternative number or person or department at AT&T to call to get help. I think we need another tower in our neighborhood as nobody gets an AT&T signal.

Please let me know...I'd hate to take back my phone due to a bad cell signal.

Dual 2 GHz PowerPC G5, PowerBook, Cinema HD Display Mac OS X (10.4.6) 4.5 GB DDR SDRAM

Here is why the activations are delayed.....ATT nor APPL to blame.

Welcome to Apple Support Community
A forum where Apple customers help each other with their products. Get started with your Apple ID.