Getting EAC wav files into iTunes without conversion

I did an exhaustive listening test between all the iTunes compression and Apple Lossless. None have the magic of EAC WAV files. Since these files will go into an iPod and played through a stereo I want to get the EAC quality with the convience of iTunes syncing and album flow graphics.

Is there anyway to get WAVs files with ID tags (or is there a utility that will tag them) to iTunes and have them retain the album/song info?

G5, Mac OS X (10.4.8)

Posted on Sep 14, 2007 10:57 AM

Reply
9 replies

Sep 14, 2007 12:43 PM in response to phrarod

WAV files don't support tagging, and despite your critical listening tests (I hope you're not plugging headphones into your sound card for this), WAV files produced with EAC don't sound any better than other WAV files or lossless files for that matter, unless you're not able to get clean rips of CDs with other software given the optical drive and software you're using.

It sounds like you're using a PC and a Mac for all of this, so are you using iTunes for the ABX (or other) tests, or are you using something like foobar2000 with a reverse engineered ALAC decoder? I guess the main point is that if you take the time to decode your ALAC files and compare them to your WAV files, they should be identical. The iTunes ALAC decoder is bug-free, but iTunes doesn't directly incorporate an ABX function, so perhaps the reliability of the testing you've done should be examined a bit more before you disregard Apple Lossless or other lossless compressors.

Sep 14, 2007 12:54 PM in response to NoName

I'm solely on a Mac platform but have a PC to check client websites we create. I use the PC to create the WAV files via EAC. All other files created on the MAC via iTunes although I even tried using toast when burning in case that could be a difference maker. It wasn't.

I've worked in the entertainment industry for a good part of my career and still have many contacts. The listening was conducted with a recording engineer from one of the labels. We did Mac output to the stereo as well as burned CDs with different compressions as well as WAV and Apple lossless, AIFF. Those we played through the same CD system on a high end, high resolution audio system.

Aside from platform differences the process and external burner and line conditioning were used throughout. I did the test blind with the engineer so there would be no bias. 10 out of 10 times the WAV file from EAC was superior. It had that bit of magic especially in air, upper high end and micro dynamics all the other lacked.

Message was edited by: phrarod

Sep 14, 2007 11:18 PM in response to phrarod

Alright, I get the picture a bit more clearly now, I think. In the sake of completeness is your listening evaluation, I might suggest sticking with your clean WAV files you're generating from EAC, and then converting those same files to Apple Lossless on the PC using dBpoweramp Music Converter with the m4a, mp4, m4b & aac codec installed. Using this codec will require that you additionally have the free Nero Digital Audio+ codec installed.

If you then use iTunes to play back the WAVs and Apple Lossless files, just make sure to visit Edit > Preferences > Playback and ensure that no effects are applied on playback (in iTunes for Mac, Sound Enhancer is enabled by default, whereas in iTunes for Windows, it's not). Also, disable Sound Check if it's enabled.

In order to make this listening test fair, I think it important to use the source WAV files to generate your other files for comparative listening rather than using the Mac to create new test files. For years, there have been claims from many users that audio extracted from audio CDs on Macs sounds quieter than audio extracted from audio CDs under Windows, and this even when Sound Check is not enabled on the Mac. I can't fairly comment on this, since I rip my audio CDs to lossless files exclusively on my PC and then move the files to my Mac for other purposes.

Sep 14, 2007 11:26 PM in response to NoName

Thanks for all the great info. I should've said I used the same wav file generated from EAC to provide the basis for all the iTunes compression tests so I/we would have a baseline.

I have heard the same about Mac's having quieter power supplies. One thing I learned from people who master and from those high end JVC discs that were out a few years ago is how important line conditioning is. I have the PC and a separate burner/reader each on their own power supplies. The PC is also isolated from the floor so it doesn't pick up any vibrations from there.

To make it a fair test when I brought the wav files over to the Mac I put the conditioners and suspension system on the Mac. I did try a wav direct into the mac but it didn't sound as good as the rip from EAC even though I used the same burner.

Who knows maybe my Mac has a noisy power supply?

Sep 25, 2007 11:06 PM in response to phrarod

Phrarod,

You're dealing with management types, they have a lot of insight into the abyss but can't answer your question or solve the problem. I have the exact same question and fully agree with your assessment of WAV file superiority over others on playback through a high end audio system. I never thought a WAV file would beat a $10K CD player, but it's happening and EAC is the enabler...remove the mechanics.

In any case, I don't care about conversion to other formats, arguments about hearing, or the definition of high end audio. I've chosen my format but also love the portability and convenience of iPods/iTunes when I'm not in front of the he-man rig hence want to access an extensive WAV library via iTunes.

Have you found a solution for WAV file music organization in iTunes keeping files in the original EAC full WAV rip? Please don't give up the quest and lead me elsewhwere if needed. Thanks for the great explanations, you have unbelievable patience. Robotele

Sep 27, 2007 8:26 AM in response to RoboTele

Thanks Robo. I originally posted on the EAC site where I was ridiculed and dismissed because "lossless is lossless" you can't hear any difference in the formats, blah, blah, blah.

I really want cover flow which is why I would especially like name/song/album in the wave files. The only choice at the moment is an unacceptable one which is to bring them into iTunes and type in all the information.

Right now I'm looking for a AIFF plug in or something of the like for EAC and see if that makes any difference.

This thread has been closed by the system or the community team. You may vote for any posts you find helpful, or search the Community for additional answers.

Getting EAC wav files into iTunes without conversion

Welcome to Apple Support Community
A forum where Apple customers help each other with their products. Get started with your Apple Account.