iPod Classic screen-more durable?

The reviews I'm reading seem to contradict each other. Some say that the new Classic screens are made of the same kind of glass (durability-wise) as the iPhone, and some are saying they're just as scratch-prone as the 5th gens were. Anyone know for sure? Obviously I am NOT going to test this, after dropping $335 bucks on this thing. (Thank goodness for the iPod recycling program! 10% discount ftw!)

Sure would be nice not to have to get a case for this new 160GB Classic. I love iSkin, but a) they don't have a skin specifically for the new Classics yet, and b) I want my new silvery iPod to be shown in all its glory!

Message was edited by: Daniel Skatter

1.8 gHz P4, 160 GB iPod Classic (Silver), Windows XP, Dalmatian iMac, hoping to get to a Real Mac again soon!

Posted on Sep 22, 2007 2:24 PM

Reply
8 replies

Sep 22, 2007 3:53 PM in response to Daniel Skatter

Dude, why ask? Just get a screen protector when they become available. You won't even know it's there with one of those clear plastic ones that only cover the screen like the Invisible Shield ones. Just imagine that it's as scratch prone as possible because scratching it would be catastrophic (if you ever want to watch a video on it).

And as for the iPod recycling program, you only received $15 off for it? That's not too good. I sold my iPod Mini a couple days ago and got $60 for it. Of course I included a world on extras, but it was a Mini. Granted, you may not have even gotten $60 for it depending on what kind of shape it was in, but I'm sure you could've at least gotten $40 for it (worst case scenario). Not flaming, just opining.

Sep 22, 2007 4:07 PM in response to Seanski

Well, first...it was a dead pink iPod Mini with a detached click wheel, and that price I gave was after tax. Actual discount was $35. So really, it was a good deal, considering the Mini was utterly and completely dead and in a very bad shape.

Second...eh. I could get a film overlay for the Classic's screen...but I'd rather not have to put anything on it. Which is why I ask about other people's experiences with the new Classic screen. Though I do notice that the brighter screen does rather drown out any smudges on the screen so far... shrug

Sep 22, 2007 5:18 PM in response to Daniel Skatter

I see. Not bad, the deal you got then. Not bad at all. And if you'd rather not put anything on your iPod, then you'd rather only keep it until the next generation, I'm assuming? It will surely, with normal use, take some lumps. I'd say the screen isn't made to be as durable as the iPod touch or iPhone simply understanding the way Apple thinks. First, the screen on the iPone is made to withstand a lot of traffic, what with it being a touch screen and all. Second, the screen is the big deal with the iPhone, it's bigger, and is made to display. The iPod Classic is more or less made to play your music. Therefore, Apple could cut costs by simply only using an adequate screen. It won't have the traffic of the iPhone because, theoretically, there's no need to actually ever touch it, right? Also, the screen is smaller and the video and photo capabilities is, for the most part, just a novelty. Anyways, I'd be very careful with the carefree liberties you intend on taking with your new device. I can understand the intention to not put anything on it, and I can understand that in a couple months, you probably wouldn't even care about the scratches it has anyways. Eh, it's all relative, actually. I'd say there's no way you'll keep this thing for the duration of its life (say 3 years) without scratching the screen if you don't protect it with a film. My opinion.

Oct 25, 2007 11:28 PM in response to GLNHP


http://www.nokiaphoneblog.com/2006/07/invisibleshieldscreenprotect.html
+The InvisibleSHIELD and the Overlay Plus are both high-quality screen protectors. So which one is better for you?+

+Well, to start with, both are made of different materials. The invisibleSHIELD is definitely the more "rubbery" of the two which makes it slightly more easier to scratch - the Overlay Plus uses some kind of extra glossy material that makes anything slide off. However, my attempts to scratch up both the invisibleSHIELD and the Overlay Plus with my keys and my fingernails ended in vain. I have to give it to both companies - these protectors are pretty scratch resistant.+

+However, on a practical note, the invisibleSHIELD wins hands down. The invisibleSHIELD has bar-none the easiest installation of any screen protector I've tried AND it comes with a lifetime warranty. Add the fact that it's cheaper than the competitors and it's over.+ >>>

Oct 26, 2007 2:02 AM in response to Daniel Skatter

The screen does seem to be more durable than previous generations, my previous was a 30GB Photo. That thing would scratch it fit touched it with a finger. My 160GB Classic seems to be able to handle things better. I am able to wipe the screen with a eyeglass cleaning cloth when it needs it. Most of the time, I keep it in a case though but I take it out of the case when I am at home. I don't care about scratches on the back so much.

This thread has been closed by the system or the community team. You may vote for any posts you find helpful, or search the Community for additional answers.

iPod Classic screen-more durable?

Welcome to Apple Support Community
A forum where Apple customers help each other with their products. Get started with your Apple Account.