Why would Apple allow something like this? Why not? Several of the available User Agent profiles take care of sensitive servers (e.g., online banking) without creating problems with other sites. The aim here, not hard to grasp, is to find the one that works optimally in cases where the default "Automatically Chosen" doesn't. Glad you hear you haven't run into ANY (sic) web sites in the past two years that refused to respond to Safari, but obviously this isn't the point. You've clearly misunderstood; the aim wasn't to "change anything about the operation of Safari," and my question made no mention of a problem "fooling the [problematic] web site." It was looking for a workaround to having to do that manually each time. Obviously users can change the User Agent to "get" finicky servers to recognize Safari for, say, an online banking transactions, but when the user conducts transactions with such a site often, it's a pain to have to manually "tell" Safari each time to imitate a server-acceptable browser. That was the reason for the question. If you don't have a solution or something constructive to contribute, hold onto your reply and your rhetorical questions to keep these forums friendly. Your not having run into a problem doesn't mean it isn't a problem for someone else.