WDS performance

I have 1 time capsule 1TB and two extreme base stations all running in a 3 station WDS. Seems to work generally.

The Apple store say WDS slows down the network. Can anybody quantify that ?

My first time machine backup would not complete via wireless and I was forced to connect to time capsule by Ethernet to get time machine to work at all. Is that because the WDS is slow. All stations have good signal to each other.

Various Macs, one intel and two ppc, Mac OS X (10.5.2)

Posted on Mar 26, 2008 12:44 PM

Reply
24 replies

Mar 30, 2008 2:30 AM in response to dchao99

Not true. In a multiple wireless base station network with an Ethernet backbone the base stations are configured to different channels to reduce/eliminate RF interference.

I thought we were talking about WDS, which all WDS cell operate in the same channel and roaming is possible.


You were talking about WDS, but Duane appears to enjoy changing the subject when he is unable to explain something.

Mar 30, 2008 3:53 AM in response to dchao99

dchao99 wrote:
Anyway, I also thought the new "extending a network" mode is built on top of the WDS protocol. IMO, network layer are exactly the same. The difference is only at the application layer. Instead of user setting up main/relay/remote WDS manually, the new mode let the base station broadcast the WDS service via Bonjour, so the MAC address can be linked up automatically. I might be wrong, but I don't think Apple would reinvent the wheel, they are not really a networking company like Lucent/Agere.


I think the Extend a wireless network is a simplified explanation for the user, but it is WDS/wireless bridging for the 802.11n network.

I think it may be Apple's attempt to avoid confusing networking jargon for the home user. If you go to the AU help database and key text search with WDS you get:

*Wireless Distribution System (WDS)*
+Extending the range of your wireless network+

Click on the link below and you come to:

*Extending the range of your wireless network*

within this page is the following note and link:

NOTE: If you’re extending the range of an 802.11n wireless network, click the link below for simplified instructions.

+Extending the range of an 802.11n network+

which takes you to:

*Extending the range of an 802.11n network*
AirPort Utility makes it simple to extend the range of an 802.11n network if you are connecting another 802.11n base station or a Time Capsule. Connecting two 802.11n devices greatly simplifies the WDS setup process.

To extend the range of an 802.11n network:
1. Open AirPort Utility and select the base station or the Time Capsule that will connect to the Internet... and so on through to...
7. Enter the network and device password if necessary.

But, although they have simplified the terminology, I think it is still clearly described as WDS in the support literature acompanying Airport Utility. However, simplifying the terminology does seems to have confused some.

Message was edited by: Ewen

Mar 30, 2008 11:47 AM in response to dchao99

I should have quoted more of your post. You stated...

Which means, if any base station is talking, no other traffic is allowed on the entire network. This has nothing to do with WDS.


Therefore I posted information on why this was not true when not using WDS.

I agree that using the star WDS configuration that you suggested does free up the wireless network quicker than when using a relay WDS configuration.

I agree that WDS and "extend a wireless network" are similar in the fact that they accomplish the same goal. Just like travelling by train or airplane are similar. Although the same goal is accomplished the mechanics off how it is accomplished is not the same.

The fact remains that AirPort Utility allows you to select one of 3 options.
  1. Create a wireless network. Choose this option if you are creating a new AirPort Extreme network.
  2. Participate in a WDS network. Choose this option if you are creating a new WDS network, or connecting this AirPort Extreme Base Station to a WDS network that is already set up.
  3. Extend a wireless network. Choose this option if you plan to connect another AirPort Extreme 802.11n Base Station to the network you are setting up.


If WDS and "extend a wireless network" were EXACTLY the same there would not be separate options.

Apple's "Designing AirPort Networks using AirPort Utility" document takes pages 42-46 to describe how to configure a WDS connection.

The same document takes only pages 46-48 to describe how to configure using the "Extend a wireless network".

Obviously they are not completely the same.

Mar 30, 2008 12:32 PM in response to Duane

If WDS and "extend a wireless network" were EXACTLY the same there would not be separate options.


They do seem to be different options. The WDS mode seems to take into account legacy 802.11b/g, while extend a wireless network is aimed for 802.11n networking.

It is not so well described in the Apple literature, i.e. strictly speaking both options are WDS, but yet clearly they are aimed at different types of airport network.

Mar 30, 2008 4:46 PM in response to Ewen

"I'd have to write that WDS might be a bit of a Time Machine killer in terms of performance. I tried it , but abandoned it as an option as data rates were much lower, defeating the point imo of having a home 802.11n network. This is why my TC is set in extend wireless network mode , allowing the AEBS to be 5GHz N mode."

Sorry, I didn't know how to do the quote thing:

So does "Extend this Wireless Network" provide better transmit rates than "WDS"? I'm thinking of getting an Express N to extend my TC N network.

Apr 27, 2008 5:36 AM in response to Ewen

Thanks for these responses, judging by them all we can expect anything from 50% to 90% slower. I have 3 Airports in a single WDS and frankly it is not robust. Time Machine traffic seems too heavy for WDS. I am guessing that WDS implements a network bridge because all 3 boxes use the same subnet. Routing would be far more efficient. I have tried various channels in case I am getting local interference.

I think I must look at other topologies (or products) because, I can live with low bandwidth but I cant live with the Airports suddenly dropping themselves off the network (yellow light), the only way to fix it to re-power. The reliability is poor. (They are all on latest firmware etc). On occasions when the Airports mess up the DHCP goes down and all 3 need to be rebooted before the wireless clients will pick up an address.

I think Apple should stress test these devices with Time Machine traffic under WDS and provide some guidance on topology and to better manage client expectation.

This thread has been closed by the system or the community team. You may vote for any posts you find helpful, or search the Community for additional answers.

WDS performance

Welcome to Apple Support Community
A forum where Apple customers help each other with their products. Get started with your Apple Account.