RAID '0' in my G5 Dual 2.7 PowerMac.... Basics help please

hi everyone,

I am upgrading my PowerMac and want to establish a, for sure, two, and possibly four drive RAID '0' structure. My research keeps bumping into the same ding dang wall:

If I upgrade from my original 250 gig drive that occupies slot 1, to two 7,200 rpm 320 gig drives loaded in drive slots 1 and 2, do I need to add a PCI-X hard drive controller card if I want to then set these two drives up on a RAID 0 structure?

Or is the computer's hardware already set up so that, with two hard drive bays occupied, we can choose to establish them in a RAID structure or choose to just have them recognized as two internal but separate hard drives?

Your help's appreciated for sure!

yours in upgrade land,

JimQ,
Whitehorse, Yukon, Canada

PowerMac G5-2.7, Mac OS X (10.5.3), Radeon X800 XT graphics card

Posted on Jun 27, 2008 11:31 AM

Reply
16 replies

Jun 27, 2008 4:28 PM in response to JimQ

Hi-
Or is the computer's hardware already set up so that, with two hard drive bays occupied, we can choose to establish them in a RAID structure or choose to just have them recognized as two internal but separate hard drives?

Yes and Yes.

Two internal drives can be set up as a RAID 0 or RAID 1 using Disk Utility in OS X.
You don't need a controller card for that.
If a 4 drive RAID, yes, you need a controller card.

How to Use Apple-Supplied RAID Software

Jun 28, 2008 12:37 PM in response to japamac

Thanks for this.

I was thinking this was the case. Again, your help's sure appreciated. I'm getting all fired up about doing this upgrade work on my computer. With the Nehalem chip MacPro's delayed into next year as they seem to be, I'm happily giving my wonderful G5 some upgrade attention. Finally get the ram maxed out too. But now, you've triggered my mind to another question about RAID 0 in my computer....

Is there a speed advantage to be gained in a two drive RAID 0 setup in a G5 like mine by connecting it through a PCI card or are things set up optimally as is with two matched drives in the two bays set up on RAID 0?

JimQ

Jun 28, 2008 5:51 PM in response to JimQ

Hi JimQ-

Speed advantages, huh? 😉 OK, let's talk....
There are some speed advantages to using a PCI card over the native controller. See these performance tests.

Drive make also plays a role in overall performance as well. There are drives, the Seagate 7200.10 series, that have real slow performance (write, among other issues) on the native controller. If these drives are to be used, a controller is definitely the way to go. More onboard controller vs PCI controller tests here.

Of course there can be speed advantages by using a PCI controller, especially if one runs a 4 drive RAID. See single, dual and quad drive Performance tests .

If you do end up getting a PCI-X/PCI controller, you will notice that many of the tests use a Firmtek/Seritek card. Not only is the card a strong, Mac compatible performer, it is also boot capable. Not all cards are boot capable, so be aware of this when you go shopping.

As for drive make, problem with the G5 performance tests is that most of the tested drives are out of production. This page compares current drives a boot volumes in a MacPro. Of course, the numbers won't be the same, but the overall performance of the drive will be similar in the G5.
My recommendation (want it or not), for a two drive RAID startup system, would be either the (2)WD 150GB Raptor, or, much more economical and almost as fast, the (2) Western Digital 640GB WD6400AAKS.

Another excellent source of information regarding RAID and Mac hardware, is AMUG.
And, thanks to Barefeats for the tests and explanations, so that I don't have to type so much! 🙂

Jun 29, 2008 10:18 AM in response to japamac

hey Japamac! Now we're having fun! And I've taken the dive and placed an order with the good people at OWC.

I bounced around in my thinking yesterday in this 'upgrading my wonderful G5 2.7ghz (complete with the cutest little radiator in it's water cooling system!) between 'go for it bigtime' or 'wait a minute JQ. Don't get so complex. Just do this simplest thing and get a pair of hard drives plugged into the two established and ready-to-RAID drive bays'. It been a journey and, now, with your inspiring words, I'm back to the 'go for it bigtime' approach.

On a cost basis, it's incredible how much our dollars can buy these days. I hit a total basket yesterday that was just shy of $800. Placing the 'just go simple' order cost half that. I'm going to re-look at my order and juice it up. What i have ordered are two of the Western Digital 640 gig hard drives. I was going to pull the 250 gig drive that's in here now and put in the two WD 640's. Then set them up on RAID 0. Now I'm thinking I should buy two more and this Firmtek card.

The speed jump differences I've seen in reviews between a two drive and a four drive RAID 0 setup are substantial. My primary work involves two programs. My business, Treeline Woodworks Ltd., is a cabinet making and millwork shop. We mostly do commercial jobs. Not a lot of residential. Office furniture. Reception desks. Boardroom furniture. Workstations. Home offices. That kind of stuff. We're five people; four on the shop floor and one, me, working in the office full-time. Most everything we make here, I design. I do my design and drawing work in an excellent 3D cad program called Vectorworks, http://www.nemetschek.net/ ,ma. When needed, I export my cad files into an awesome rendering program called Artlantis Studio, http://www.artlantis.com . In there, I mostly create photo-realistic presentation images for my clients. I also occasionally do l panoramas, rotatable VR objects and animations of the project. Both programs are power hungry. My files are typically in the 80 to 100 megabyte size. Computational power is what these programs want. The faster bits and bytes and can be moved around, the better. I know I will love it when a new Nehalem MacPro replaces this G5 but, in the meantime, this computer is awesome.

I put that paragraph of info in to give you an idea of the foundation I stand on in my computer work. With my Macs, over the past eighteen years or so, I always buy the most powerful model Apple's got at the time. I've been very happy with this G5. Now, back to upgrade land....


So, you've inspired me to make some additions to order with OWC. Your guidance here is bang on. And, lo and behold, darned if I don't have another question....

Now, I'm doing a four drive RAID 0. I'll buy two more WD 640's and the Firmtek card. Is it better to have all four drives inside the computer cabinet? The ability to 'hot swap' is not going to be an issue for me for a pile more years. Four 640gig drives will give me 2.5 terabytes total storage! That's tons! (sure do love the growth into big capacity that's happened over little more than the past year.) So, 'hot swap' ability will not be a need.

All that said, is it better to have all four as internal drives? Or is it, speed-wise, basically equal if two drives are in the internal bays and two are in an external case? Connecting all, of course, with eSata ports...

Geez, that's the only question I have! I guess we're getting close to having this 'JQ Upgrades His G5 PowerMac' process complete and ready to turn into functioning reality!

Look forward to hearing from you and, always, thanks tons for your help. It's really appreciated!

JimQ

Oops, one more question: Should I replace my Radeon X800 XT with the X1900 Mac G5 Edition or some other video card that's significantly faster?

Jun 29, 2008 10:56 AM in response to JimQ

Sometimes you want to have just one huge volume, your stripped RAID. And sometimes it is fine to boot from a single fast drive and have all the work and media (and even the home account) be on a separate drive or stripped RAID.

Drives will move easily to Mac Pro, but not video card or SATA controller (you have PCI-X, not PCIe).

Some drives are "RAID enabled" and WD and Samsung have theirs, while Seagate/Maxtor doesn't differentiate. A lot of people RAID with standard drives and don't seem to run into any problem.

If you need capacity to expand, 1TB drives are also getting affordable. If you want performance, and feel you need 4 drives just to ease disk I/O as much as possible, that, too. Because 90-105MB/sec PER DRIVE is possible (outer tracks).

Don't know what is in your shopping cart, that $800 "slush fund" upgrade, but SeriTek 5PM is a nicely built %525 case for 4-5 drives using Port Multiplier controller or direct connect.

I use just half a drive, the rest is formatted as 'free space' before I even create the RAID to maximize performance, though with some there really is little drop-off. ie, take the 600GB capacity, and stripe half of each and still have 300GB system volume, with 50% free. The free space can be used to store static files if need be.

And put all the scratch and editing and data on an external case, with 1TB drives for backups, right? and grow the external non-system drives as needed. And that way you aren't locked into the controller having to support booting.

It is also easier to backup and restore/maintain a separate system volume separate from data. The system won't change a whole lot day to day, but data does.

Your 1TB drives can go into eSATA enclosure, and you can add drives as needed to fill it up.

So while 5-drive case is more up-front, you will appreciate its uses down the road. Rather than using $199 dual drive case(s). Might give you more choices in SATA controllers.

http://www.barefeats.com/hard102.html
http://www.amug.org/amug-web/html/amug/reviews/articles/firmtek/5pm/

Jun 30, 2008 6:32 AM in response to JimQ

Hi JimQ-

Glad you're excited, but we have more planning to do.

So, with a 4 drive RAID, you're looking at some serious performance. Also heat. Better to use an external housing. Both the heat and the power needs can have negative effect when all is installed internally. The port multiplier housing that The hatter recommends is a sweetheart. That (or similar), with 4 drives, each direct connected to a PCI controller (4 eSATA port) would give you a great RAID setup.

So, what is this port multiplication about, you say? Well, this is a hardware based process of allowing all drives in the external cabinet to be connected as "one" using one data cable. This is great to allow for additional eSATA ports to be used elsewhere, but there is a performance hit. Using the direct connection of each drive allows for the maximum performance achievable.

Logistically, as suggested, using a single drive for OS and Applications, and then using the RAID to do the work would probably be a good way to go.

So, now that we have a boot drive, and a 4 drive RAID, we have to protect all that data that we are processing. Remember, in a RAID 0, when one drive goes down, all is lost. So, we need a backup scheme for the 4 drive RAID 0 set.
As sweet as a 4 drive RAID 0 sounds, the reality is you have to duplicate the hardware capacity to duplicate the data. We could just connect a couple of external firewire interfaced housings, and do the backups manually. But, we wouldn't want to forget to backup.
A more automatic approach might be more beneficial....RAID. This means run a second RAID set. This could get spendy....

There is another way.... combining RAID types accross multiple sets, or nested RAID.

Using a RAID 1 set to mirror the RAID 0 set (RAID 1+0) would provide "automatic" redundancy of data. In this way, if one drive in the RAID 0 set went down, the drives in the RAID 1 set would have the data stored. Better, if the hardware supports it, and requiring hardware RAID (thought to be better than software RAID anyways), would be a RAID 5+0 (RAID 50). This gives increased safety of data should a disk or two fail.

What this all means, bottom line, in a 4 640GB drive nested RAID set will give you 1.2TB of data capacity accross the set, yet data integrity is maintained in case of drive failure.

Yeah, gets confusing, but it's your business, and your livelyhood, so we can't make these decisions lightly. The four guys in the shop would be real p **d off if you lost all their work due to some hardware failure....
A bit of reading might be good. Nested RAID Levels and the parent page, RAID may help educate you a bit regarding the subject.

OK- so back to it...
So, let's say that we have our boot drive, and our 4 drive RAID 10 in an external enclosure.
Do we want to keep all the data on the RAID set? Once processed, and the plan is finalized, I think best to have a place for that file to reside, or archive, if you will.
Well, we have that second internal bay, yet, and a big ol' 1TB drive would hold quite a bit of data.
Maybe this would be just the spot for our archive drive....

Now, I've possibly completely muddied the once seemingly clear waters of this topic. But, playing Devil's advocate is sometimes better than allowing one to blissfully spend hard earned dollars.

Then again, keeping to the K.I.S.S rule, just run a single boot drive, a 2 1TB drive RAID 0, and backup to a 1TB internal might be all a guy really needs.....To do that, I'd install a 150GB 10K Raptor as the boot, two 1TB Hitachi drives in an OWC housing, connected to a FirmTek/Seritek controller card, backed to another 1TB Hitachi inside the tower.

Hey, except for the 1TB drives (mine are WD 640GB drives) sounds like my setup.......
Oh, and my Vectorworks still runs on OS 9....outdated, maybe, but a great tool!

BTW, I like The hatters suggestion a lot. Especially the way it has room to grow.....

And, lastly, keep the X800XT. Only the X850 is faster (a bit), and the X1900 is PCIe (for dual core G5's), not AGP.

Jun 30, 2008 7:21 AM in response to japamac

Not all G5s can use the 150GB Raptor, and Barefeats and users are now looking at 7.2K drives as boot drive. Only the last PCI Express quad-core G5 has been known to use Raptor natively w/o controller.

PM scales quite well, and while there is "only" 300MB/sec per channel, that means 3 drives are still okay. And when you build larger RAIDs (with multiple cases) the hit is even less. AMUG seems to have the best real tutorials on storage controllers and RAID to get started.

Mirrors are for where real-time capture and you can't afford to loss a session but only after you have a backup strategy.

I'd like to see WD start shipping their RE3 and Black series for RAID. Sonnet and WD do not endorse SE-series for RAID, though I confes to being the type to do exactly what you should not, to see with my own eyes, so I have 4 x 500GB Caviar SEs runnning off Sonnet E4P 😉

Jun 30, 2008 7:42 AM in response to The hatter

I was hoping you'd have some comments..... Thanks! 🙂
Mirrors are for where real-time capture and you can't afford to loss a session but only after you have a backup strategy.

That's the point that I am hoping is taken, that of the need for backup. I know I didn't touch on the extra externals for the backup, leaving it as an assumed necessity.
I'd like to see WD start shipping their RE3 and Black series for RAID. Sonnet and WD do not endorse SE-series for RAID, though I confes to being the type to do exactly what you should not, to see with my own eyes, so I have 4 x 500GB Caviar SEs runnning off Sonnet E4P

I have the Raptor and three WD6400AAKS running through the SeriTek 1VE2+2. I really like the performance, and haven't seen any negative...... except slower wake from sleep. Saw the specs on the WD drive, and thought, that's gotta' be fast in a RAID, and, they are!
I guess we'll see how enthusiastic I am if/when they die! 😉

Jun 30, 2008 7:58 AM in response to JimQ

Hi JimQ-

Just a couple of things to have you look at regarding drives.

One, is a user report page discussing a particular WD drive (not the 640GB), with a mention of the Raptor, as indicated by The hatter. (wish Barefeats included that note on the boot02 page...)
WD4000KD/Onboard G5 SATA Problems

The second item, is the Accelerate Your Mac! Mac Drive Upgrades/Compatibility Database which is good for some reports on what some find to work, or not. Enter a particular drive maker/model, G5 and Search.

Jul 1, 2008 1:48 PM in response to japamac

hey Japa,

Took the day off yesterday. Back here peacefully today as it's Canada Day today. Stat holidays are always excellent days to work in the office!

I'm feeling rather out of breath after reading your letter! And with the Hatter's letter bouncing in my mind now too, it's all just a wee bit of a lot. I had a feeling, in looking into creating a better, faster and higher capacity hard drive system, that I was at the base of a large mountain. Interestingly, it remains today as it did two days ago and now with way more excellent information and educated guidance, either I climb to the top of this mountain and get into the awesome valley on the other side OR I go part way up for now, get things to a point that is improved to my G5's current status quo but is not at the final solution. Yet. Go simple. Spend less. OR go all the way. Spend more. Get way more.

I'll have to think about it. And follow up on the links and directions you two have so kindly given me. I need to go through enough of a RAID self-education process so as to be comfortably in command of just what the options all mean. I have to do this in order to make the right choices. Big in the 'if I go all the way' option is, in that it would cost quite a bit in total, cross-compatibility so that the bulk of my RAID system can move forward into my Nehalem Pro when that day comes. I guess there's a certain level of 'impossible to totally know' in this due to there being no way of totally knowing just what Apple's scheming for us for the next Mac Pro beyond just the chips. Time will tell but, for sure, if I spend bigger bucks now on my RAID system, I'll want to be able to move it into my next computer.

Tons to figure out. I am, now, in a bit of a 'chicken or egg', 'cart or horse' situation as I did, on the same day as I came here and asked for help, place an order with OWC. That order was based on my simpler understanding of RAID and, in the order, I'd made the 'go simple for now' choice. What I have whisking it's way to me from them as I type are two WD 640 gig Caviar drives, a lovely Sonnet 'three Firewire 800 + two USB 2.0' port PCI Express card, and four 1 gig rams to get my G5 from it's current 5 gigs of ram up to it's max 8 gigs. (have four 1 gig rams plus two 512mbs right now. Replacing the 512's with 1's).

So, in terms of possible RAID setups, I can/could take the two WD 640 drives and load them simply into the G5's available two hard drive bays, letting the RAID be handled by the machine's board. Just doing that is going to be a huge improvement from my current, now very humble, single 250 gig drive, so I can see where I might most comfortably end up there. On the other hand though, I'm just steps away from having an excellent, fully utilizable, and safe, (through mirroring) RAID system. Again, the big thing here that I have to get comfortable with is the forward capable aspect.

One questions bouncing in me now. It's to do with Apple's new 'Time Capsule' automatic backup system....

I have the 500 gig model. And love it. The new OS capability of doing automatic backups for us is awesome. I've used the 'Time Machine' aspect of it numerous times just in the four months I've had it. Question is:

Where does, or can, the Time Capsule system work in regards to RAID? Can not it function as the 'fail safe' backup for a RAID 0 structure? Or are they simply not able to be part of a RAID setup?

Be great to have your help on this one as, for me at this point, I can't begin to answer the question. My rational brain tells me it should function exactly as it does now be it backing up a computer's single hard drive or backing up a four or five drive RAID....

Look forward to hearing from you and thanks again, tons and mucho, for your, and everyone's, help. Its striking me that there's a big need for a complete and extensive 'Mac OS and Mac OS Based Computers RAID Structures' manual!

thanks,

JimQ,
Whitehorse

ps- I thought my X800 XT was the one to hang on to!

Jul 1, 2008 2:23 PM in response to japamac

I'll cross my fingers and hope I'm okay on this one. I tell ya, diving off into reading this long page of upgrade info (and woes) my mind very quickly maxed out. The 'too much information' syndrome attacking aggressively! (I'll be okay! 🙂 )

I've been exploring at WD and OWC and have run into another 'world of hard drives' question. This one's more of a quandary that rolls out into a question:

Question: With Serial ATA clearly being the best way to connect drives, why are there so few external drive boxes with SATA ports? There are tons of Firewire 400 and USB 2.0's available. And there are some Firewire 800's available. But SATA's are rare and, when I do find them, they're most often a 'Quad Interface' box. Surely, we are paying more for this than we would for a 'SATA only' interface...?

Thoughts?

Jim

Jul 1, 2008 2:29 PM in response to JimQ

If you want to look at my post on setting up an external RAID setup:
http://discussions.apple.com/thread.jspa?messageID=7479466#7479466

The way I see it, from where you are, is this:

If you want to clone your system onto your two WD 640GB drives, you need to either clone it now to a FW/USB drive, then pull your 250GB drive and install the new drives and format as RAID;

Or, get an SATA enclosure with FW ports such as OWC Quad-interface (I use one and works nicely). And then boot off that.

4 drive RAID can wait until you need the speed, or have data to hold that much.

You don't need to RAID until you feel ready, AND have your backups implemented first. When you are comfortable with backup/restores, and in using SuperDuper etc along with, say, TimeMachine so you know how to do it. (One reason I use RAIDs is for fast backups and constantly moving file data and systems around.)

I've used RAIDs for my TM backup volume, doesn't make it much faster, but TM can backup a RAID or be TM volume - I partitioned off a chunk of stripped RAID space and used a dual-drive 750GB volume.

The only problem would be if your boot drive that you use to do the restore-from-TimeMachine wasn't able to 'see' your RAID (say the SATA RAID controller needed 3rd party software driver).

Not a problem with your internal drives. Though I wish Apple would sell a 10.5.4 DVD @ reduced price so I don't need to use 10.5.0 retail version which I think does have its "limitations" - heck, I think 10.5.3/.4 is finally what Leopard is finally looking like its out of testing and all and everything working more as it should...

... EXCEPT today I find myself "testing" why my system froze up....

I was using SuperDuper to backup to a sparse disk image. The image was on a RAID controlled by Sonnet E4P Tempo SATA controller. I made a backup in 10.5.3 yesterday and works fine. Tried to update a different image today and SD is locking up my system.

So off to run Disk Warrior; run TechTool Pro 4.6.1; and doing backups and such now in 10.5.3 before I feel ready to try one more time to find out the big question...

DID 10.5.4 BREAK SONNET TEMPO? SUPERDUPER? Did I stumble on something?

I saw where Leopard Cache Cleaner was updated for 10.5.4, the author is really always ready and on top of changes and updates.

So what changed? if anything? (I don't think my system locking up or whatever was chance and I really detest hitting the power button to get out of such a jam.

There is always the chance that an OS X update WILL break something like a 3rd party controller (there were changes and "issues" with ATTO and others with 10.5.2, suppose to be fixed in 10.5.3/.4) that come into play. Maybe even that very very rare 1/1,000,000 bug that SoftRAID reported on.

Don't go skiing outside marked areas! I once landed on a rock that was hidden under snow crust, thanks to not being covered by 40+" that would normally have fallen.

Jul 2, 2008 6:52 PM in response to JimQ

With Serial ATA clearly being the best way to connect drives, why are there so few external drive boxes with SATA ports? There are tons of Firewire 400 and USB 2.0's available. And there are some Firewire 800's available. But SATA's are rare and, when I do find them, they're most often a 'Quad Interface' box. Surely, we are paying more for this than we would for a 'SATA only' interface...?

You did see this eSATA housing? One or two drives, RAID or individual drive access, and inexpensive. I have one, and am very pleased with it.
G-Tech also has some options.

This thread has been closed by the system or the community team. You may vote for any posts you find helpful, or search the Community for additional answers.

RAID '0' in my G5 Dual 2.7 PowerMac.... Basics help please

Welcome to Apple Support Community
A forum where Apple customers help each other with their products. Get started with your Apple Account.