Eye strain from LED backlighting in MacBook Pro

There is one relatively serious con of the new LED backlit displays in the new MacBook Pros that seems to not get too much mention in the media. About a month ago I bought a new MacBook Pro to replace my standard white MacBook. One feature of the MacBook Pro that I was unaware of was the introduction of the LED backlit display to replace the CCFL backlight.

Once I started using my new laptop for long periods of time, I noticed severe eye strain and minor symptoms almost similar to motion sickness. After 20 or 30 minutes of use, I felt like I had been looking at the screen all day. Much longer and I would get headaches. If I used the old white MacBook (with its CCFL display), I had no eye troubles at all. Moreover, I could detect a distinct flicker on the MacBook Pro display when I moved my eyes across it - especially over high contract areas of the screen. White text on a black background was virtually impossible for me to read without feeling sick to my stomach because of all the flickering from moving my eyes over the text.

The strangest thing about all of this was that nobody else I showed the screen to could see these flickers I was seeing. I began to question my sanity until I did a little research. Discovering that the MacBook Pro introduced a new LED backlit display started to shed some light (so to speak) on what might be going on. I had long known that I could see LED flicker in things like car taillights and christmas lights that most of my friends could not see. I also knew that I could easily see the "rainbow effect" in DLP televisions that many other people don't see.

My research into LED technology turned up the fact that it is a bit of a technological challenge to dim an LED. Varying the voltage generally doesn't work as they are essentially designed to be either on or off with a fixed brightness. To work around this limitation, designers use a technique called pulse width modulation to mimic the appearance of lower intensity light coming out of the LED. I don't claim to fully understand the concept, but it essentially seems to involve very briefly turning off the LED several times over a given time span. The dimmer the LED needs to appear, the more time it spends in the off state.

Because this all happens so very quickly, the human brain does not interpret the flickers as flickers, rather as simply dimmer light. For most people that is. Some people (myself included) are much more sensitive to these flickers. From what I can tell, the concept is called the "flicker fusion threshold" and is the frequency at which sometime that is actually flickering is interpreted by the human brain as being continuously lit. While the vast majority of people have a threshold that doesn't allow them to see the flicker in dimmed LEDs, some people have a higher threshold that causes them to see the flickering in things like LED car tail lights and, unfortunately, LED backlit displays - leading to this terrible eye strain.

The solution? I now keep my screen turned up to full brightness to eliminate the need for the flicker-inducing pulse width modulation. The screen is very bright, but there are no more flickers and I love my MacBook Pro too much to exchange it for a plain MacBook with CCFL backlighting (which will also supposedly be switching to LED backlighting in 2009 anyway.) The staff at my local Apple store was of course more than helpful and was willing to let me exchange my glossy screen for matte even though I was beyond the 14 day return period. I knew that wasn't the problem though as my old MacBook was a glossy display. I've decided to stick with my full brightness solution. Sitting in a brightly-lit room tends to help alleviate how blinding the full brightness of the screen can be. In a dimly-lit room I guess I just wear sunglasses. Either way, the extreme brightness is worlds better than the sickening flicker I saw with a lower brightness setting

I would caution anybody considering buying a product with an LED backlit display to pay careful attention to make sure you don't have this same sensitivity. Turn the screen brightness down, find a high contract area of the screen, and quickly move your eyes back and forth over the screen. If you can detect the flicker, you may end up with this same problem.

I have no idea what percentage of the population has this sensitivity. I imagine we will hear more about it as more and more displays start using this technology. Hopefully the Apple engineers will come up with a way to eliminate this flicker some of us can see.

Russ Martin

15-inch MacBook Pro, Mac OS X (10.5.4)

Posted on Aug 23, 2008 8:25 AM

Reply
Question marked as Top-ranking reply

Posted on Dec 12, 2017 5:28 PM

User uploaded file

2,489 replies

Dec 18, 2013 2:29 PM in response to mojarvinen

As i said before there are different screens manufacters for the HTC One.


http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2202869


In this image below, this are not my phones, but the image fullfils the purpose:


https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/548546/IMG_0028.JPG


My second screen is similar to the right one, cooler. One thing i notice is the rainbow effect. It's much more prounanced on the second one. I notice on my new screen but never on the old one. You'll see below later what i am talking about...

My screen:


m7_panel_init panel ID = PANEL_ID_M7_SHARP_RENESAS_CMD

m7_panel_init: PWM IC version A2


I dont know if the PWM it's about Pulse-width-modulation, so i just wanted to check. First i tried with shutter speeds of 1/25 and 1/8. Nothing all smooth.


So i tried 1 second, even if it didn't make any sense, and to my utter suprise i found this:

low brightness


http://imageshack.us/a/img43/6748/rt7k.jpg

http://imageshack.us/a/img843/1034/48j8.jpg


this not make any sense... i count 10 lines. This means PWM of 10hz?????


This is really weird... Shouldn't i notice on naked eye?


Then i tried full brightness:


http://imageshack.us/a/img209/5106/5epd.jpg


In this photo i had a higher ISO so, it's more smooth:


http://imageshack.us/a/img10/9291/p6pm.jpg


you can see near the top some colours... just a curiosity...


This PWM is really strange... around 10Hz. altough i dont understand if the light fully stops or not.


What puzzle's me it's the led's on the bottom of the phone also appear to have this frequency, so maybe it's just me, who's just doing something wrong.



Now in this 2 pictures:



http://imageshack.us/a/img854/6109/bhmi.jpg

http://imageshack.us/a/img801/2758/b5x3.jpg


you could see the polorised effect, but with colors. Live it's much more visible then on photo. If put the glasses and watch my monitor 27'' LED i just see white or black as i move my head... but on the phone it's full of rainbow colours...

Dec 18, 2013 2:49 PM in response to kvoth

I'm very glad that you've gotten significant relief of your symptoms by switching to grayscale. It didn't work for me, but whatever works for you is good for you. On the other hand, do you want to be restricted to grayscale for all of your computing? If that were the case, I would start to look for alternatives to Apple. Also, I disagree with your statement that "grayscale can get rid of dithering". Dithering is simply a way to simulate colors (whatever their hue) that the hardware cannot produce directly by alternating colors that it can. Grayscale shrinks the 24-bit RGB color space (not counting the alpha channel) to an 8-bit space, which gives 256 grayscale levels. If you want 10-bit grayscale (1024 levels), for some colors you would need to dither between two grayscale levels, potentially leading to the same "snow" pattern that causes eyestrain, depending on the details of how the dithering is done. Now, what is possible is that grayscale in conjunction with high contrast might work (again, depending on how high contrast is implemented), but high contrast even without grayscale might work too.


On a completely different note, I purchased the Prevencia coating for my glasses, and I haven't found it to have made any difference at all. Perhaps it's keeping my eyes safer than they would be without it, but I don't notice less eyestrain. OTOH I always use f.lux so there probably isn't much extra blue light coming from my monitor anyway.

Dec 18, 2013 3:22 PM in response to tfouto

tfouto wrote:


What is helping you tremendously? the glasses and greyscale? How do you make it greyscale?


The glasses help me in everyday tasks, such as when I go into a store or gym that has bad overhead lighting. They don't "fix" things outright, but they make them easier. But even with the glasses on, troubling LED screens continue to cause issues, though not as bad as without them.


The grayscale on my 2013 macbook pro retina display completely fixes the strain on my eyes. Without grayscale, I get severe symptoms. With it on, I have no issues. When I use my older external monitor, the Dell U2410, I can have color on without severe symptoms.


To turn on grayscale on OSX go to System Preferences -> Accessibility -> Use Grayscale.



mvanier wrote:

do you want to be restricted to grayscale for all of your computing?


I'm just trying to help others out. Grayscale computing > no computing.



If that were the case, I would start to look for alternatives to Apple



LEDs are not unique to Apple.



Also, I disagree with your statement that "grayscale can get rid of dithering". Dithering is simply a way to simulate colors (whatever their hue) that the hardware cannot produce directly by alternating colors that it can. Grayscale shrinks the 24-bit RGB color space (not counting the alpha channel) to an 8-bit space, which gives 256 grayscale levels. If you want 10-bit grayscale (1024 levels), for some colors you would need to dither between two grayscale levels, potentially leading to the same "snow" pattern that causes eyestrain, depending on the details of how the dithering is done.



As you say, if you limit the grayscale to a space that your monitor supports natively in the hardware then you are eliminating dithering.


On a completely different note, I purchased the Prevencia coating for my glasses, and I haven't found it to have made any difference at all. Perhaps it's keeping my eyes safer than they would be without it, but I don't notice less eyestrain. OTOH I always use f.lux so there probably isn't much extra blue light coming from my monitor anyway.


f.lux changes the hue of color. It will not eliminiate ultraviolet light nor reduce flicker. I think we should end the conversation on f.lux, it is not a solution.

Dec 18, 2013 4:08 PM in response to Jessiah1

Jessiah, fluorescent lights don't bother me at all. The very old mechanical-ballast ones that flicker at 60 Hz do bother me but the only place I've seen them in the past few years is our local DMV (dept of motor vehicles), which is just one of many reasons to avoid that place :-) Even LEDs don't bother me that much; I have an iPhone 4S which initially bothered me but I got used to it. LED light bulbs do bother me, though some of them are because of flicker (Cree) and others because of color (Philips).


My real problem is flicker, which I am acutely sensitive to.

Dec 18, 2013 4:13 PM in response to kvoth

Kvoth, LEDs are not unique to Apple, and I never said they were. In fact, the whole conversation about LEDs seems to me to be completely misguided, as they are not the primary problem for most of us as far as I can tell (including you), although as you say they may make a bad situation worse. I'm actively looking into Linux as an alternative because I can control the graphics drivers on Linux in a way that is impossible with Apple or Windows (yay for open source!). You may not need this or want to go this way. I'm glad you've found an approach which works for you, and it's fine to let others know in the event that it works for them too, but there are a lot of us here, each with their own particular issues. BTW I've tried my Macbook with two different CCFL-backlit external monitors, and the flicker and eyestrain was still there, even with grayscale.

Dec 18, 2013 8:33 PM in response to mvanier

Mvanier, it is interesting that your sensitive to the lower frequencies, very similar in fact to the range which is known to cause epileptic seizures. Kvoth and myself are sensitive to a wider range of frequencies reaching into the supposed to be invisible to the eye level. Fluorescent lighting is an issue for both of us and that is where the Provencia anti-glare coating is very effective while with LED it may only help by adding just a few minutes of tolerance.


I believe it would be very difficult to say the exact percentage of people here who have the exact same sensitivity to the exact same triggers. Without the anti-glare coating fluorescent lighting makes me just as sick as LED lighting so my level of sensitivity is much greater than yours, LED lighting of any kind triggers migraines almost instantly.Sometimes they go away if I remove myself from exposure quickly but I can feel it starting instantly so I have 0 tolerance to LED. My symptoms are more than eye strain, nausea, fatigue, balance issues, brain dysfunction and many more symptoms.


My symptoms can last for days and I have met several other people who have almost exactly the same level of pain as myself, I would say that your not even close, so why is that? Why do you have some reaction but can tolerate some LED usage and no reaction to fluorescent lighting?


One thing is certain for me (myself being a good measure since I am the extreme), flicker and spectrum are an issue. There are some very blue and bright white fluorescent lamps which are almost as bad as LED lamps for me, but if spectrum were the only issue than why do yellow LED's bother me and fire places? There is plenty of scientific info out there showing increased flicker from blue spectrum lighting, is it that the bight white and blue spectrums flicker more for some reason? I am no scientist but from what I have read this makes sense and Kvoth is getting somewhere with the "Square" light info.


It may be that modern image rendering and dithering are adding to the issue but the LED lighting is the source of the intensity for sure and science will show that, I am sure of it. I have read hundreds of pages about this, I will leave you with this paper link on different lighting tests, check out the results from all the different light sources tested and see the potential for flicker in "Solid state lighting" compared even to fluorescent and also the most pleasant light source, incandescent:


http://www.e3tnw.org/Documents/2011%20IES%20flicker%20paper%20poplawski-miller-F INAL.pdf


I hope this deeper detail about myself and this article help bring some new topics to light:)

Dec 18, 2013 8:48 PM in response to Jessiah1

Jessiah, I'm sorry you have such severe issues. It certainly puts my more modest issues into perspective.


I have had a severe negative reaction to a yellow LED light bulb (Cree) but that was not because of the color, which was quite pleasant; it was because the light flickered at 120 Hz and the flicker was very deep (all on to all off). This gave me tremendous eyestrain in a few minutes, presumably because my irises were expanding and contracting very rapidly in response to the flicker. I gather that most people can't see this and have no issues with this bulb. I also had a (less severe) issue with a Philips LED bulb which didn't flicker but had a very harsh bluish light, so I'm at least somewhat sensitive to blue light too.


My interest in dithering arose from noticing that connecting a new Macbook to an old CCFL-backlit monitor which did not cause any issues at all when connected to an older Macbook resulted in severe eyestrain. Given that I'd eliminated the influence of LED backlights (there was none with the CCFL-backlit monitor) and PWM (there was only the softer PWM that CCFL backlights exhibit, which doesn't bother me), something else had to be responsible. That doesn't rule out the possibility that some people (presumably including you) have severe issues coming from other causes. We're all trying to understand all causes of eyestrain here, and so in addition to LED blue light sensitivity and PWM, we have to include dithering (or something that seems to be related to dithering) as one of the common causes.

Dec 18, 2013 10:10 PM in response to mvanier

Yet again I see that people are using the displays that cause problems and try to mitigate it with glasses, grayscaling or something else.


I just still would like to point out - try to eliminate all flickering/dithering displays for a couple of weeks, buy a display that is confirmed not to cause problems to a person sensitive to flicker. Then you might notice that no glasses or grayscaling or similar is needed.



When I use a flickering display, my eyes are also so sore that all kinds of lights seem to bother me (like lights in the gym) But that it not actually the gym lights, it's just the fact that I have my eyes open, which causes irritation when my eyes are sore from the flicker.


Just try the displays that I listed, you'll most likely come back reporting that the whole eye issue has resolved.


Yes, it took me too years to realize this and most people cannot just go and purchase $700 display to test. But as I understand, in many countries like US, stuff can be bought and then returned without any specific reason.


I'm now fully on top of what causes irritation and how to resolve it. It has been actually quite amazing last 6 months, as I've had zero irritation and red eyes, until last weekend, when I used the flickering iPad.


I've noticed that nowadays there are a lot of moisturizing eye drop commercials on TV. Also I've noticed that many people seem to have bloodshot eyes, more ofthen than say, 5 years ago.

My take on this is that people are using flickering LED displays that cause irrititatioin, but blame it on tirednes or the flu, or the wind or what ever, not realizing that it is actually the new LED TV or LED computer display or LED phone that is causing it. (LED is not bad as such, but the on/off cycle that is instant, makes the problem worse than CCFL)


My previous Samsung display was CCFL with PWM of 160 hz. That did cause irritation, but only if I was doing something like gaming 3 hours a night for 5 days in a row - then I just had to stop using a computer for a while.

It is all along been the flicker.

Dec 19, 2013 12:31 AM in response to mojarvinen

Does anyone understand this issue of 10hz PWM?


I take a shot at 1 second, even if it didn't make any sense, and to my utter suprise i found this:

low brightness


http://imageshack.us/a/img43/6748/rt7k.jpg

http://imageshack.us/a/img843/1034/48j8.jpg


this not make any sense... i count 10 lines. This means PWM of 10hz?????


This is really weird... Shouldn't i notice on naked eye?


Then i tried full brightness:


http://imageshack.us/a/img209/5106/5epd.jpg


Am i doing something wrong? I think i must so.

Dec 19, 2013 1:06 AM in response to mvanier

Hi mvanier,

I could verify with the frame grabber that when using the proprietary nvidia drivers under Linux, you can control the GPU dithering (nvidia-settings).

However the eye strain is not gone when disabling it and my best theory now is that the dithering on the monitor side cannot be controlled, and in the end having or not having eye strain is a question of luck and it depends on dithering pattern and colour calibration on both GPU and monitor side.

By best guess right now is to use a Linux notebook with an nvidia GPU and disable the GPU dithering, although is also probably not ensured that the notebook panel is not doing some dithering on its own which cannot be controlled...

I'm also not aware of any stand-alone monitor which is not using dithering. Even if the panel is 8bit capable it is still using dithering to increase to 10bit (for precise color calibration).

Dec 19, 2013 7:07 AM in response to mvanier

Mvanier, please continue discussing dithering I was in no way being critical of your inputs on that subject. My main point is that there are a range of symptoms here starting with what sounds like normal dry eye fatigue, moving to a more moderate eye strain issue and ending with something severe like my migraines and disorientation. I believe we have nothing close to a controlled scientific experiment here and everyone is saying "This works for me so it should work for you" just a little too much.


It appears we do have some great research going on here with monitors, my post was more questioning why some of us cannot tolerate any form of LED light and have immediately severe symptoms and some of us are simply talking about an irritation of the eyes or moderate eyestrain.


If only you and I were in close proximity to each other, we could test your monitor settings on someone severe like myself and we could answer some of those questions. The most interesting thing that could come out of this forum would be a controlled experiment with 3-5 of us ranging in symptoms, we could find common ground and possibly common solutions that could at least mitigate symptoms for most if not all people here. I do not have the expertise or the money to start testing different technology....


Being that you seem to have different sensitivities than myself I have a couple of ideas and questions for you:


1: Are you sensitive at night to LED tail lights on cars?


2:When you say you get severe eyestrain from a device, does this include any other symptoms like headaches or is it just eye pain?


3: The older 60hz fluorescent lighting you spoke of that bothers you, could you please try the Provencia coating under these lights and let me know if it helps? I am very curious about this!


One closing thought I will leave you with: When my sensitivity started 3 years ago it was milder and I only seemed to have an issue with overhead fluorescent lighting. It was not until I was exposed to some very harsh very blue overhead LED lighting for a period of 2 weeks about 1 year ago this past September that I developed a hyper sensitivity to all LED lighting. This poses an interesting question, is it possible those lights did some kind of permanent damage to my already sensitive brain/eyes during those 2 weeks of migraine **** while I tried to keep my job? Also, will those like yourself get more sensitive as they get more exposure over time? I certainly do not wish my level of sensitivity on anyone, it is terrible however, are some people here headed down my road?


Jessiah

This thread has been closed by the system or the community team. You may vote for any posts you find helpful, or search the Community for additional answers.

Eye strain from LED backlighting in MacBook Pro

Welcome to Apple Support Community
A forum where Apple customers help each other with their products. Get started with your Apple Account.