Eye strain from LED backlighting in MacBook Pro

There is one relatively serious con of the new LED backlit displays in the new MacBook Pros that seems to not get too much mention in the media. About a month ago I bought a new MacBook Pro to replace my standard white MacBook. One feature of the MacBook Pro that I was unaware of was the introduction of the LED backlit display to replace the CCFL backlight.

Once I started using my new laptop for long periods of time, I noticed severe eye strain and minor symptoms almost similar to motion sickness. After 20 or 30 minutes of use, I felt like I had been looking at the screen all day. Much longer and I would get headaches. If I used the old white MacBook (with its CCFL display), I had no eye troubles at all. Moreover, I could detect a distinct flicker on the MacBook Pro display when I moved my eyes across it - especially over high contract areas of the screen. White text on a black background was virtually impossible for me to read without feeling sick to my stomach because of all the flickering from moving my eyes over the text.

The strangest thing about all of this was that nobody else I showed the screen to could see these flickers I was seeing. I began to question my sanity until I did a little research. Discovering that the MacBook Pro introduced a new LED backlit display started to shed some light (so to speak) on what might be going on. I had long known that I could see LED flicker in things like car taillights and christmas lights that most of my friends could not see. I also knew that I could easily see the "rainbow effect" in DLP televisions that many other people don't see.

My research into LED technology turned up the fact that it is a bit of a technological challenge to dim an LED. Varying the voltage generally doesn't work as they are essentially designed to be either on or off with a fixed brightness. To work around this limitation, designers use a technique called pulse width modulation to mimic the appearance of lower intensity light coming out of the LED. I don't claim to fully understand the concept, but it essentially seems to involve very briefly turning off the LED several times over a given time span. The dimmer the LED needs to appear, the more time it spends in the off state.

Because this all happens so very quickly, the human brain does not interpret the flickers as flickers, rather as simply dimmer light. For most people that is. Some people (myself included) are much more sensitive to these flickers. From what I can tell, the concept is called the "flicker fusion threshold" and is the frequency at which sometime that is actually flickering is interpreted by the human brain as being continuously lit. While the vast majority of people have a threshold that doesn't allow them to see the flicker in dimmed LEDs, some people have a higher threshold that causes them to see the flickering in things like LED car tail lights and, unfortunately, LED backlit displays - leading to this terrible eye strain.

The solution? I now keep my screen turned up to full brightness to eliminate the need for the flicker-inducing pulse width modulation. The screen is very bright, but there are no more flickers and I love my MacBook Pro too much to exchange it for a plain MacBook with CCFL backlighting (which will also supposedly be switching to LED backlighting in 2009 anyway.) The staff at my local Apple store was of course more than helpful and was willing to let me exchange my glossy screen for matte even though I was beyond the 14 day return period. I knew that wasn't the problem though as my old MacBook was a glossy display. I've decided to stick with my full brightness solution. Sitting in a brightly-lit room tends to help alleviate how blinding the full brightness of the screen can be. In a dimly-lit room I guess I just wear sunglasses. Either way, the extreme brightness is worlds better than the sickening flicker I saw with a lower brightness setting

I would caution anybody considering buying a product with an LED backlit display to pay careful attention to make sure you don't have this same sensitivity. Turn the screen brightness down, find a high contract area of the screen, and quickly move your eyes back and forth over the screen. If you can detect the flicker, you may end up with this same problem.

I have no idea what percentage of the population has this sensitivity. I imagine we will hear more about it as more and more displays start using this technology. Hopefully the Apple engineers will come up with a way to eliminate this flicker some of us can see.

Russ Martin

15-inch MacBook Pro, Mac OS X (10.5.4)

Posted on Aug 23, 2008 8:25 AM

Reply
Question marked as Top-ranking reply

Posted on Dec 12, 2017 5:28 PM

User uploaded file

2,489 replies

Jan 3, 2014 5:04 PM in response to tfouto

Polarized spectacles have the effect of minimizing glare, whether from snow, ocean or computer screen. Regular polaroid sunglasses and prescription polaroid multifocal (or fixed-focal length) spectacles are polarized horizontally: for multifocals, this is the only option. Computer screens on the other hand, are polarized either horizontally, vertically, or at 45deg. If your polaroid glasses and the computer screen you're using are polarized in the same direction, i.e. horizontally, then you will see the image with the glare removed. If your screen is polarized vertically, you will see nothing unless you awkwardly rotate your head a little. If the screen is polarized at 45deg - a weird IBM feature - you will see an image darkened by 50%. My current iMac 2008 screen is polarized vertically, so I had to have fixed-focus vertically polarized glasses made up for a reading distance of about half a metre. It worked well, but did not entirely eliminate episodes of painless migraine (visual disturbances lasting about 20 minutes). Final verdict: worth the expense. My current iPad 2011 screen is polarized horizontally when viewed in landscape, and so is visible with my prescription multifocals, which I use also for driving, reading outdoors etc. Rotate the screen to portrait, and the image disappears. OK, so back to the old iMac. The disadvantage of reading a screen comfortably with fixed focus glasses is that you can't just glance down at paper documents, then back to the screen. The new iMac Retina screens are polarized horizontally, and so are visible with my multifocal polaroids. Now I have access to the best possible conditions for minimizing glare and being able to read at all distances without changing glasses all the time. Excellent, you'd think; but the Retina's bad press from eye-strain sufferers makes me wonder about updating my iMac, in case there is some other factor at play - e.g. pixel density, or even the horizontal polarization itself! After all, this too is a new feature.


Hope this helps. By the way, the science of polarization of light doesn't matter much in this practical context. Polaroid lenses are just filters that screen out the glare caused by scattering of light. The only light let through has an electric field that oscillates only in one plane, instead of radially in all planes. Gaussfactor.

Jan 4, 2014 3:48 AM in response to Gaussfactor

Polarized lenses reduce reflection, not glare. Reflections of sunlight from horizontal non metallic surfaces (snow, water, automobile dashboard) are naturally polarized on reflection. Quite the opposite of being scattered. Polarized sunglasses are polarized in the opposite direction to cut out reflections from surfaces whilst allowing direct light through normally. Some tint is usually added for general light attenuation.

The reason "polaroid shades" are becoming unpopular is that some phones and tablets are polarized one way, some the other, so some phones (or display screens) can be seen normally wearing them, some are almost black and have to be used landscape. The direction is entirely at the whim of the manufacturer.

There is no question of older screens being intentionally made less or more friendly as a result of a change in polarization direction. It's just manufacturing convenience.

Jan 7, 2014 10:59 AM in response to dmendel

Still looking for feedback on the u2410.


I am also looking for opinions on the BenQ flicker-free VA panel monitors. They sound appealing with no PMW, no dithering, low brightness and high contrast. I am just wondering if anyone who had problems with Apple displays tried these out. I specifically interested in the 24" monitors -- I am not comfortable with the higher resolution/smaller text of 27" screens.

Jan 7, 2014 1:59 PM in response to dmendel

dmendel,


I've mentioned several times that I own and use a Dell U2410 monitor, and it's absolutely awesome! Very very comfortable to look at for extended periods of time and beautiful colors. It's a shame Dell doesn't sell it any more. The replacement model (the U2413), also looks good for an LED-backlit monitor. It uses current-controlled dimming down to 20% brightness, and below that uses PWM (but at the very high frequency of 8 Khz, which very few people are likely to be able to perceive). It also uses the new GBr-LEDs instead of traditional "white" LEDs; the GBr-LEDs supposedly have a much better color balance which should translate into more comfort. I would be very interested in hearing from anyone who has seen/bought this monitor.

Jan 7, 2014 7:17 PM in response to mvanier

mvanier wrote:


dmendel,


I've mentioned several times that I own and use a Dell U2410 monitor, and it's absolutely awesome! Very very comfortable to look at for extended periods of time and beautiful colors. It's a shame Dell doesn't sell it any more. The replacement model (the U2413), also looks good for an LED-backlit monitor. It uses current-controlled dimming down to 20% brightness, and below that uses PWM (but at the very high frequency of 8 Khz, which very few people are likely to be able to perceive). It also uses the new GBr-LEDs instead of traditional "white" LEDs; the GBr-LEDs supposedly have a much better color balance which should translate into more comfort. I would be very interested in hearing from anyone who has seen/bought this monitor.


Yes, I have read your endorsement. Was hoping to get other opinions as well. It looks like I can buy a refurbished U2410, so no return. I like the CCFL backlight, but was just worried about dithering. The Benq is appealing for LED backlight, but I would like to know real world performance from someone who is sensitive to Apple displays. I am really not interested in accurate color reproduction all that. I am a heavy computer user, but mostly just word processing, powerpoint, web browsing. No gaming. I am far more concerned about my comfort than about intense vivid graphics, etc.

Jan 7, 2014 9:03 PM in response to dmendel

If you've read my posts then you know that I'm extremely sensitive to what we've been calling dithering, and the U2410 doesn't bother me at all when used with my older hardware/drivers. I am of the opinion that dithering is much more due to the graphics driver/card than the monitor, though apparently the monitor needs to be able to do dithering or support dithering coming from the graphics card, as the U2410 certainly can (as can most or all monitors available today). I too am much more concerned about comfort than about vivid graphics or color reproduction, which is why I use f.lux among other things.

Jan 8, 2014 1:57 AM in response to dmendel

hi dmendel,


with regrets I can tell you that I got myself a Dell U2410F with great hopes (after reading carefully this email thread) and it didn't help me at all. I got the monitor in eBay for about USD250 and the specs -pleny of input connectors- and comments here where looking very appealing -i.e. it doesn't do dithering, 8-bit color, etc.


I've tried the following with the unit:


- Connect my macmini via HDMI port ---> no luck, still same sympthoms, eye strain, diziness, pain... My conclussion was that the inteln HD4000 graphics card was somehow sending a signal to any monitor that will produce the unconfortable eye effect.


- so, I take my very old desktop PC (the one I'm using for work as last resort, 2007 pentium 4 with NVIDIA GeForce FX 5200 and my monitor LG Flatron L1750S) and just hope that by plugging it to the Dell via VGA I'll have at least a big and decent display. To my disappointing, when connecting my known good PC to the Dell U2410, the problems appear!!! Go and explain this... It is not the graphic card, it is not the drivers (windows XP btw) and a combination that works well with an old monitor turns out to don't with the Dell. My conclussion, whatever the GPU card signals to the monitor gets interpreted somehow by its hardware & software (calle it dithering or something else) to the dislike of our eyes.


all in all, I'm back to desperation. There goes 250$ and what is worse the hope and ilusion that this time it will work. Perhaps I didn't have the right settings? I've tried all possible combinations of brigthness, contrast, gamma, color types... with no luck. I must say that aside the non-working-as-expected fiasco, the image quality wasn't that impresive.


Sorry for delivering bad news and by all means keep trying mate! It might be the case that it works for you.


best regards to all,


luis

Jan 8, 2014 6:06 AM in response to luisx

I think it makes sense to be something in the graphics card, seems like some kind of incorrect synchronization with the monitor? I am not an engineer, but to what else can i say about the experience i describe below.


In my work place i have two monitors: Asus VW193D and Dell P1911. My old Dell desktop was running Win 7, and i had no problem with either monitor for many hours of work. VGA Connection.


Changed the tower with a new HP desktop PC running Win 7, i get terrible headache and eye strain after an hour of work. Specifically with the Dell monitor i get eye strain in just 5 mins. Both displays are CCFL and i use a VGA connection. I wonder if there have been any major changes in the graphics card technology.


Currently I am working only with the Asus display, and only with frequest breaks, which is not convenient especially during periods of job pressure.

This thread has been closed by the system or the community team. You may vote for any posts you find helpful, or search the Community for additional answers.

Eye strain from LED backlighting in MacBook Pro

Welcome to Apple Support Community
A forum where Apple customers help each other with their products. Get started with your Apple Account.