You can make a difference in the Apple Support Community!

When you sign up with your Apple Account, you can provide valuable feedback to other community members by upvoting helpful replies and User Tips.

Looks like no one’s replied in a while. To start the conversation again, simply ask a new question.

Eye strain from LED backlighting in MacBook Pro

There is one relatively serious con of the new LED backlit displays in the new MacBook Pros that seems to not get too much mention in the media. About a month ago I bought a new MacBook Pro to replace my standard white MacBook. One feature of the MacBook Pro that I was unaware of was the introduction of the LED backlit display to replace the CCFL backlight.

Once I started using my new laptop for long periods of time, I noticed severe eye strain and minor symptoms almost similar to motion sickness. After 20 or 30 minutes of use, I felt like I had been looking at the screen all day. Much longer and I would get headaches. If I used the old white MacBook (with its CCFL display), I had no eye troubles at all. Moreover, I could detect a distinct flicker on the MacBook Pro display when I moved my eyes across it - especially over high contract areas of the screen. White text on a black background was virtually impossible for me to read without feeling sick to my stomach because of all the flickering from moving my eyes over the text.

The strangest thing about all of this was that nobody else I showed the screen to could see these flickers I was seeing. I began to question my sanity until I did a little research. Discovering that the MacBook Pro introduced a new LED backlit display started to shed some light (so to speak) on what might be going on. I had long known that I could see LED flicker in things like car taillights and christmas lights that most of my friends could not see. I also knew that I could easily see the "rainbow effect" in DLP televisions that many other people don't see.

My research into LED technology turned up the fact that it is a bit of a technological challenge to dim an LED. Varying the voltage generally doesn't work as they are essentially designed to be either on or off with a fixed brightness. To work around this limitation, designers use a technique called pulse width modulation to mimic the appearance of lower intensity light coming out of the LED. I don't claim to fully understand the concept, but it essentially seems to involve very briefly turning off the LED several times over a given time span. The dimmer the LED needs to appear, the more time it spends in the off state.

Because this all happens so very quickly, the human brain does not interpret the flickers as flickers, rather as simply dimmer light. For most people that is. Some people (myself included) are much more sensitive to these flickers. From what I can tell, the concept is called the "flicker fusion threshold" and is the frequency at which sometime that is actually flickering is interpreted by the human brain as being continuously lit. While the vast majority of people have a threshold that doesn't allow them to see the flicker in dimmed LEDs, some people have a higher threshold that causes them to see the flickering in things like LED car tail lights and, unfortunately, LED backlit displays - leading to this terrible eye strain.

The solution? I now keep my screen turned up to full brightness to eliminate the need for the flicker-inducing pulse width modulation. The screen is very bright, but there are no more flickers and I love my MacBook Pro too much to exchange it for a plain MacBook with CCFL backlighting (which will also supposedly be switching to LED backlighting in 2009 anyway.) The staff at my local Apple store was of course more than helpful and was willing to let me exchange my glossy screen for matte even though I was beyond the 14 day return period. I knew that wasn't the problem though as my old MacBook was a glossy display. I've decided to stick with my full brightness solution. Sitting in a brightly-lit room tends to help alleviate how blinding the full brightness of the screen can be. In a dimly-lit room I guess I just wear sunglasses. Either way, the extreme brightness is worlds better than the sickening flicker I saw with a lower brightness setting

I would caution anybody considering buying a product with an LED backlit display to pay careful attention to make sure you don't have this same sensitivity. Turn the screen brightness down, find a high contract area of the screen, and quickly move your eyes back and forth over the screen. If you can detect the flicker, you may end up with this same problem.

I have no idea what percentage of the population has this sensitivity. I imagine we will hear more about it as more and more displays start using this technology. Hopefully the Apple engineers will come up with a way to eliminate this flicker some of us can see.

Russ Martin

15-inch MacBook Pro, Mac OS X (10.5.4)

Posted on Aug 23, 2008 8:25 AM

Reply
2,489 replies

Jun 5, 2011 2:23 AM in response to RMartin111

I bought my first 17" MacBook Pro in early 2008, and I've always loved the product. I recently decided to upgrade to the 2011 model, but after five minutes I noticed that I had terrible pain behind my eyes and a splitting headache. I felt like my eyes couldn't focus anywhere on the screen. It was a really weird sensation. I figured I just needed to get used to the new product, and at the time I didn't even consider something like different backlighting.


I tried to adjust to the new screen over a period of almost two weeks, but every night I just went to bed with a stronger headache, and I rarely experience headaches. Feeling as though I must be going crazy, I decided to do a simple Internet search to see if anyone else was having a similar problem. I was relieved to find that I'm not alone. I actually returned the new MacBook Pro, and the Apple employees were very nice about the transaction.


I decided to just have a few things fixed on my 2008 model of MacBook Pro, and it's once again going strong. However, I realize that I can't use this machine forever. I'm worried that when the time comes that I must purchase a new computer, I'll have to use an external LCD monitor or switch back to PC. I would really like to be able to continue using Macs. It's a shame that something like the display is keeping us from using the new, beautiful MacBooks. I'm not sure what the solution is as I recognize that it is difficult for such a large corporation to please everyone. I hope that there will eventually be a viable solution for those of us who have such a sensitivity to this type of backlighting.

Jun 5, 2011 7:05 AM in response to RMartin111

I point people to this article recently published:


http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/2011/05/23/glossy-vs-matte-screens-why-the-pc-indus trys-out-of-touch/



Then I point to Apple's upcoming OS X Lion, notice how there is more space around icons, buttons and such to better accommodate a touchscreen OS.


http://www.apple.com/macosx/lion/


Obviously future Mac's are going to have a touchscreen of some sort, and thus that nulls the possibility of a anti-glare film on the surface of the glass/LCD panel to scatter reflective light.


The top MacBook Pro lines may continue to have anti-glare screen option as they are used for professional work in multiple environments (editing on the scene for instance), but at the sacrifice of not being able to use the touchscreen UI, which I don't think they will really mind, as their software requires fine control that only a pointer can provide.


The entire computer industry thinks that touchscreen computers are the next big evolutionary step, even Microsoft's Windows 8 (see it on Youtube) is a touchbased operating system



However there is hope for glossy screen sufferers, there is special glass and acrylic that is altered on the atomic surface level as the substance is produced, thus reducing surface reflections to less than 1%.


This material is more expensive, the process is patented and since China (where Apple's products are made) wants any company doing business in it's country to give up it's intellectual property, doesn't sound like this material is going to come to Apple products in any short amount of time unless Apple shifts it's manufacturing operations back to a intellectual property enforcing country. Apple is in China not only to make it's products, but also to sell them. Which the Chinese goverment requires companies that want to do buisness in their country set up manufactoring operatings there.


So forces are against glossy screen sufferers, people need to try make due with alternatives.

Jun 5, 2011 6:02 PM in response to ds store

ds store: I don't understand why you think touch screens have to be glossy — they manifestly don't. Nearly every touch-screen point-of-sale cash register I've ever seen had a non-glare surface. Nor is applying an antiglare film to a glossy touch screen a no-no, as witness the countless iPhones (including mine) and other touch-screen cell phones in use today with aftermarket non-glare screen protectors on them. So I'm mystified by your post.


And as someone else has posted before me, this thread is about LED backlighting, not glossy screens. Glossy screens may or may not dominate the display industry in years to come as they seem to be dominating it right now, but there is certainly every reason to believe LED backlighting will do so.

Jun 14, 2011 8:16 PM in response to RMartin111

I've been talking with a friend who wants to switch to Mac, but she told me about these font issues (which I had never heard of before, and I do not own a Mac with an LED-backlit display). A little research led me to this discussion thread.


One thing I discovered about font smoothing in OS X since 10.6 was released was that Apple had changed the multiple font smoothing options in 10.5 down to just two: basically on or off. You used to get the following:


  • Automatic - Best for Main Display
  • Standard - Best for CRT
  • Light
  • Medium - Best for Flat Panel
  • Strong


This hint over at Macworld allows you to use the Terminal to choose a different setting, using the older "levels" of font smoothing:


http://hints.macworld.com/article.php?story=20090828224632809


While poking around to help my friend, I noticed my font smoothing checkbox (in the Appearance prefs) was a straight line as opposed to a checkbox. I clicked it and it changed to a checkbox. My font display also got noticeably worse.


Either I used this hint in the past and forgot, or 10.6 kept my setting from 10.5. Either way, I ran the tip, using the "2" setting (Medium), and presto, font display was back to what I had been using.


I'm curious if this tip will have any effect on the issues the backlit-LED users are experiencing. My friend had already returned the iMac so we can't test on her end.

Aug 6, 2011 10:27 AM in response to @MuDaeBoJongShin

I purchased one of the new 13 inch Thunderbolt Macbook Airs two weeks ago. Like so many others, similar issues with eye strain, headache and nausia. Your post with the suggestions for modifying display settings are exactly what the doctor ordered. Thanks so much for posting them.


The only one were I was surprised at your suggestion and went in the other direction is gamma. Higher gamma seems to increase contract and reduced contrast with a lower gamma seems to me the better direction to go in. I put it at 1.8.


Of course, having Lion on my brand new MBA, I'm not sure my options are identical to those in Snow Leopard. Under calibration, there's an Expert Mode option, which guides you through a a process of determining your displays luminance response curve, in addition to the other settings you mention. I went through that but I don't really know whether it had a material impact on the final outcome.


So, like you, it seems MUCH better now. Mind you, my eyes are still irritated from yesterday. So I guess I won't know for a bit whether I'm really done mucking with settings.


Thanks again.

Aug 14, 2011 1:58 PM in response to Dave Nikkel

Dave, are you referring to these settings?


1. Changed the colour temperature to exactly 5000K via the calibration in Displays.

2. Increased gamma to maximum, also via the calibration. (I doubt whether this was actually helpful but I don't want to change anything now it's alright.)

3. Ensured font smoothing is set to default (see 'Deleting the font smoothing override' at http://macperformanceguide.com/Trials-FontSmoothing.html ).

4. Enabled "Use LCD font smoothing" in Appearance (which is the default).

5. Disable any third-party colour temperature software, such as Flux, and reboot.


I spent 1.5 hours working on an MBA 11" a few days ago and I developed a headache within the first 15 minutes. I had trouble focusing on the display, espeically when i first began using it.


It's interesting that my 15" MBP also has an LED display (http://www.everymac.com/systems/apple/macbook_pro/stats/macbook-pro-core-2-duo-2 .4-15-early-2008-penryn-specs.html), but it was one of the first models and it also has a matte display. I suspect that Apple switched to an inferior display in later models.

Aug 16, 2011 11:53 PM in response to Dave Nikkel

I haven't changed the settings on the 15"MBP; it hasn't bothered me as-is but I don't use it much. My wife has never complained about it and she also did not care for the 11"MBA display. I have a new 13" MBP arriving Thursday; I'll see how it goes. I'm going to try some Power Support anti-glare film to cut reflections. I use the same stuff on an iPad and it does the trick.


I'll use the MBP a lot the first week and if I have a problem I'll send it back to Amazon.

Aug 17, 2011 7:05 AM in response to Steve03011983

Steve03011983 wrote:


Perhaps I'm just a bit of a PC snob, but I've always had this problem with Macs. The back-lit on the Air is particularly bad. But I've had this problem with the old tower Macs in the late nineties.


In the late 90s there were no LED-backlit displays at all. All displays then were CRTs or fluorescent-backlit LCDs.

Aug 17, 2011 3:03 PM in response to cbcsvd

cbcsvd: If the glass in front of the MBP's display were held in place by magnets as it is in the iMac, that would be a reasonable thing to try. But it isn't: it's held in place by a continuous strip of very sticky adhesive all around the perimeter. It's not nearly as easy to remove without breaking it (or to replace without getting a lot of junk stuck in the adhesive, if you decide your MBP looks lousy with the edges of its LCD and other internal hardware exposed) as the iMac's glass is. So this isn't an option that can be highly recommended to MBP owners.

Eye strain from LED backlighting in MacBook Pro

Welcome to Apple Support Community
A forum where Apple customers help each other with their products. Get started with your Apple Account.