RMartin111

Q: Eye strain from LED backlighting in MacBook Pro

There is one relatively serious con of the new LED backlit displays in the new MacBook Pros that seems to not get too much mention in the media. About a month ago I bought a new MacBook Pro to replace my standard white MacBook. One feature of the MacBook Pro that I was unaware of was the introduction of the LED backlit display to replace the CCFL backlight.

Once I started using my new laptop for long periods of time, I noticed severe eye strain and minor symptoms almost similar to motion sickness. After 20 or 30 minutes of use, I felt like I had been looking at the screen all day. Much longer and I would get headaches. If I used the old white MacBook (with its CCFL display), I had no eye troubles at all. Moreover, I could detect a distinct flicker on the MacBook Pro display when I moved my eyes across it - especially over high contract areas of the screen. White text on a black background was virtually impossible for me to read without feeling sick to my stomach because of all the flickering from moving my eyes over the text.

The strangest thing about all of this was that nobody else I showed the screen to could see these flickers I was seeing. I began to question my sanity until I did a little research. Discovering that the MacBook Pro introduced a new LED backlit display started to shed some light (so to speak) on what might be going on. I had long known that I could see LED flicker in things like car taillights and christmas lights that most of my friends could not see. I also knew that I could easily see the "rainbow effect" in DLP televisions that many other people don't see.

My research into LED technology turned up the fact that it is a bit of a technological challenge to dim an LED. Varying the voltage generally doesn't work as they are essentially designed to be either on or off with a fixed brightness. To work around this limitation, designers use a technique called pulse width modulation to mimic the appearance of lower intensity light coming out of the LED. I don't claim to fully understand the concept, but it essentially seems to involve very briefly turning off the LED several times over a given time span. The dimmer the LED needs to appear, the more time it spends in the off state.

Because this all happens so very quickly, the human brain does not interpret the flickers as flickers, rather as simply dimmer light. For most people that is. Some people (myself included) are much more sensitive to these flickers. From what I can tell, the concept is called the "flicker fusion threshold" and is the frequency at which sometime that is actually flickering is interpreted by the human brain as being continuously lit. While the vast majority of people have a threshold that doesn't allow them to see the flicker in dimmed LEDs, some people have a higher threshold that causes them to see the flickering in things like LED car tail lights and, unfortunately, LED backlit displays - leading to this terrible eye strain.

The solution? I now keep my screen turned up to full brightness to eliminate the need for the flicker-inducing pulse width modulation. The screen is very bright, but there are no more flickers and I love my MacBook Pro too much to exchange it for a plain MacBook with CCFL backlighting (which will also supposedly be switching to LED backlighting in 2009 anyway.) The staff at my local Apple store was of course more than helpful and was willing to let me exchange my glossy screen for matte even though I was beyond the 14 day return period. I knew that wasn't the problem though as my old MacBook was a glossy display. I've decided to stick with my full brightness solution. Sitting in a brightly-lit room tends to help alleviate how blinding the full brightness of the screen can be. In a dimly-lit room I guess I just wear sunglasses. Either way, the extreme brightness is worlds better than the sickening flicker I saw with a lower brightness setting

I would caution anybody considering buying a product with an LED backlit display to pay careful attention to make sure you don't have this same sensitivity. Turn the screen brightness down, find a high contract area of the screen, and quickly move your eyes back and forth over the screen. If you can detect the flicker, you may end up with this same problem.

I have no idea what percentage of the population has this sensitivity. I imagine we will hear more about it as more and more displays start using this technology. Hopefully the Apple engineers will come up with a way to eliminate this flicker some of us can see.

Russ Martin

15-inch MacBook Pro, Mac OS X (10.5.4)

Posted on Aug 23, 2008 8:25 AM

Close

Q: Eye strain from LED backlighting in MacBook Pro

  • All replies
  • Helpful answers

first Previous Page 23 of 160 last Next
  • by LovesDogs0415,

    LovesDogs0415 LovesDogs0415 Apr 20, 2012 7:47 AM in response to @MuDaeBoJongShin
    Level 1 (4 points)
    Apr 20, 2012 7:47 AM in response to @MuDaeBoJongShin

    OMGOODNESS, thank you SO much.  So the backlighting comes from LED!!!  That makes sense, but because the specs said LCD screen I was confused.  I didn't think those two things could co-exist: LCD and LED. 

     

    Well, it goes back tomorrow with sadness. I will miss the ability to record memos without a headset, the ability to take photos and use iCloud, but I have to be able to see and use a device without a headache and other symptoms of eyestrain. I am glad that a few vendors have the 3rd generation, which I think is okay.

     

    I wish Apple could find a way to accomodate those of us who are sensitive to this type of display.  I love the simplicity and function of Apple products, and will enjoy them as long as I can. 

     

    I am curious:  how are other display backlit, if not with LED?

     

    Thanks, again.

  • by MisterMojo,

    MisterMojo MisterMojo Apr 20, 2012 9:13 AM in response to LovesDogs0415
    Level 1 (0 points)
    Apr 20, 2012 9:13 AM in response to LovesDogs0415

    CCFL backlighting is the alternative; it was used in all LCDs before LED backlighting was introduced.

     

    Some external displays are still available with CCFL. NEC has thirty displays starting at $300 MSRP.  I have the NEC WUXi2 24" that was recently discontinued. I use it with a 13" early 2011 MBP.  It is a terrific display that is built like a tank (it weighs as much as my 24" iMac...) and NEC displays have a four year warranty. All NEC displays have a matte anti-glare panel.

     

    NEC displays are often available at discount prices from B&H Photo and other online retailers.

  • by LovesDogs0415,

    LovesDogs0415 LovesDogs0415 Apr 20, 2012 10:12 AM in response to MisterMojo
    Level 1 (4 points)
    Apr 20, 2012 10:12 AM in response to MisterMojo

    Perfect!   I want to give you 10 points for THIS SOLVED MY QUESTION.  How do I do that?  I have bookmarked your response AND saved it in my Evernotes file. 

  • by Rosekirk,

    Rosekirk Rosekirk Apr 23, 2012 8:25 AM in response to MisterMojo
    Level 1 (0 points)
    Apr 23, 2012 8:25 AM in response to MisterMojo

    I also wanted to say thank you to MisterMojo for the link to the site with CCFL displays.

     

    I bought a 27'' 2011 iMac and within a week was experiencing the same symptoms as the original poster... headache, eyestrain and a weird feeling like my eyes were bulging out of their sockets, motion sickness and throwing up. 

     

    I do graphic design work where correct color is very important so programs like Shades or wearing computer glasses isn't an option for me but hooking up an external CCFL backlit moniter and taping black construction paper over the iMac screen completely solved the problem.  I'm not at all happy that I had to invest another $1000 into a moniter when I'd already sprung for the 27" iMac but at least now I can get back to work.

  • by eww,

    eww eww Apr 23, 2012 6:14 PM in response to LovesDogs0415
    Level 9 (52,994 points)
    Apr 23, 2012 6:14 PM in response to LovesDogs0415

    LovesDogs: Only RMartin, the person who posted the question that started this thread a long time ago, is able to award points to people who have responded to it. But everyone likes a thank-you, and I'm sure your appreciation will make someone feel good.

  • by stanillee,

    stanillee stanillee Apr 30, 2012 4:30 AM in response to Pixel Eater
    Level 1 (0 points)
    Apr 30, 2012 4:30 AM in response to Pixel Eater

    Pixel Eater,

    I'm becoming a very desperate man - I cannot use most LED backlit devices including the latest IPad3.

    You say that most apple products are now PWM free.

    Are any of the laptops PWM free? If so could you name some.

    I'm really desperate.

    Many thanks in advance.

  • by Pixel Eater,

    Pixel Eater Pixel Eater Apr 30, 2012 4:47 AM in response to stanillee
    Level 1 (0 points)
    Apr 30, 2012 4:47 AM in response to stanillee

    As far as I'm aware nearly the entire range is PWM free, except for the Air. The iPad 3 almost certainly is, and the iPhone 4S is for sure, and likely its predecessors. Unfortunately that is not all there is to it. I know that I'm sensitive to something else about Apple's approach to LEDs, it's not a bad one, but intense nonetheless. I mean I can tell they've really have mulled these details, but there's just something about the Cinema Display that melts my face. Meanwhile HP makes a 27 inch monitor, also LED, also flickerless that I find much gentler. How the light source can differ so greatly I may never understand. The first issue with the iPad 3 is what it took to get sufficient amounts of light through the increased resolution - twice the LEDs than before. If Apple really is prepared to release retina laptops, they should have the same complication. I mean the real test is being in front of one. For now I've built my little HP Mini netbook. Pixel Qi, backlight disabled and it's certainly Kindle-esque, minus the dreadful limitations. It's not perfect though... but might hold me over till Apple releases the iNk in 2020. Still if the iPad 3 is an issue the rumor, I believe patent drawing based, has it next gen MacBooks could use the same kind of dual lightbar technology.

  • by stanillee,

    stanillee stanillee Apr 30, 2012 3:44 PM in response to Pixel Eater
    Level 1 (0 points)
    Apr 30, 2012 3:44 PM in response to Pixel Eater

    Thanks Pixel Eater. Really appreciated.

     

    Were the early unibody macbook pros PWM free? - my wife has one it gives me headaches and nausea too.

    If they have always been PWM free then there must be something else causing my problems.

     

    Also are there any other manufacturers of laptops that are PWM free and easier on the eye that you know of.

     

    Thanks again.

  • by surfingonsinewaves,

    surfingonsinewaves surfingonsinewaves May 6, 2012 4:12 AM in response to stanillee
    Level 1 (0 points)
    May 6, 2012 4:12 AM in response to stanillee

    I'm a bit confused about all this. I definitely have eyestrain from using several apple products, mainly 2011 MacBook pro 13.

     

    Need a new computer and can't decide whether to get a high end mini with a ccfl monitor of some kind, or maybe wait for the new iMac with anti glare? Half the people I read say mac displays help them and half say the opposite in terms of the backlighting but most people agree glare is a big strain issue.

     

    Any help appreciated, and also if going Leon the ccfl route, I can't find a decent nec here in the uk for less than 600 pounds, quite steep!

     

    Thx

  • by Slunce,

    Slunce Slunce May 24, 2012 5:54 AM in response to RMartin111
    Level 1 (0 points)
    May 24, 2012 5:54 AM in response to RMartin111

    I have replied to this post before as I had to return brand new 2010 17'' MacbookPro due to feeling dizzy and having kind of blurred vision because of the screen.

     

    This is update to this thread as I've gone to test drive the new iPad with retina display and after 10 minutes I started to get the - now very well known - feeling of having dizzy vision.

     

    So I left and saved my money I was ready to spend.

     

    Anyway - this makes me worried as I bet this is going to be the same with the new macbooks.

     

    Suprisingly enough I had a chance to use Dell laptop, also with LED, and although not as pleasant as CCFL I did not feel it was that hard on my eyes. It definitelly was not as bright as MBP which was great. I can't stand MBP brightness and honestly do not understand who does (I run my 2007 CCFL MBP, I am still using due to the fact I can't buy a new one, on 30%-40% of brightness with absolute satisfaction).

     

    I plan to buy MBP once it comes out and I also plan to ship it straight back if it causes me any discomfort.

     

    Edit: I can look at my iPhone 4 screen all day long and have no issues, apart from being less able to fall asleep if I use it for considerable amount of time right before going to sleep - not sure if anybody found that but I would have though this might be the same with any monitor/TV/etc. However I noticed I've got the same issue if I watch a LED TV in the evening.

  • by Pixel Eater,

    Pixel Eater Pixel Eater May 24, 2012 6:11 AM in response to Slunce
    Level 1 (0 points)
    May 24, 2012 6:11 AM in response to Slunce

    Diziness is a hallmark of my syptoms too. I can't imagine what could differ between non-PWM LEDs where some have this effect on my while others don't. I do think having a matte screen actually helps, but something else is the matter here.

  • by eww,

    eww eww May 24, 2012 6:36 AM in response to Slunce
    Level 9 (52,994 points)
    May 24, 2012 6:36 AM in response to Slunce

    Slunce: You do know you can turn the brightness down, don't you?

  • by Slunce,

    Slunce Slunce May 24, 2012 6:52 AM in response to eww
    Level 1 (0 points)
    May 24, 2012 6:52 AM in response to eww

    I certainly do.

     

    However if you turn that down to comfortable level two things happen:

     

    1) color fidelity is gone

    2) it seems to amplify the dizzyness issue

    3) whatever you do, the white keeps being poisonous blinding white even on lower leves.

     

    So not that it can be turned down to sort anything out.

     

    I don't really think you can get as low as with CCFL either.

     

    I think they make it so bright it looks good in their shops under lots and lots of artificial light however that's nowhere near to environment in which most people use these machines. I do not find it overwhelming in apple stores - however as soon as I bring it home I know something is wrong. The displays are boosted to be atractive, not comfortable.

  • by Slunce,

    Slunce Slunce May 24, 2012 7:00 AM in response to Pixel Eater
    Level 1 (0 points)
    May 24, 2012 7:00 AM in response to Pixel Eater

    Matte screen does not help. The MBP I returned had matte screen.

     

    Let me also note that I look at a computer screen for cca 10 hours a day with absolutely no issues whatsoever - not even tiredness. But give me a MBP with LED for an hour and I will have to go for a walk. Can't bear it.

  • by eww,

    eww eww May 24, 2012 8:15 AM in response to Slunce
    Level 9 (52,994 points)
    May 24, 2012 8:15 AM in response to Slunce

    I'm sorry to hear that reducing the brightness isn't the answer for you. But you do have to remember that it's only a very tiny percentage of users who have any trouble with current and recent MBP screens. Apple isn't pulling a fast one on all its customers with its store setups. The overwhelming majority of buyers (many, many millions of them by now, compared to the 100 or 200 different sufferers who have posted here) are delighted with their screens — most of them even more so at home, where they can control the lighting, than in the store where they can't. So it's too bad that the screens don't work for you. I hope you can find something else that does.

first Previous Page 23 of 160 last Next