Apogee Rosetta vs. Metric Halo 2882

I have owned the MH 2882 for 4 years and use it without a mic pre. I'm considering an upgrade and have thought about buying the Apogee Rosetta 200 (i find i don't ever use more than 2 inputs so not considering the 800 - unless someone tells me there's a sonic difference between the two). Any advice? Or Should i be considering the Ensemble or is that a lateral move?

Dual 2.7 Ghz PowerPC G5, Mac OS X (10.4.2)

Posted on Nov 9, 2008 7:34 AM

Reply
3 replies

Nov 17, 2008 2:51 PM in response to Craig Deleon

IMHO, and even without ever heard the MH stuff, I´d say you´ll notice an improvement in sound quality providing you already have great mics and preamps, and also good monitoring. But if your plan is to use the Rosetta as interface via Symphony or FW.... well: It works perfectly, but it`s a closed system. There´s no way you can add some other converters to the mix as you can do with the MH, because they don`t offer digital connections (yes they do, but then you can`t use the Apogee converters... so what`s the point?), and it doesn`t work with Aggregate Device neither. Because I had to sold the symphony system (loosing a nice bunch of $$$) and kept the Rosetta800 via ADAT to my RME FF800. Of course the Symphony system is somehow better, but I use lots of I/O and need something I can afford for non critical stuff, esp. when mixing... I record almost everything thru the Rosetta.
just my 2 cents

This thread has been closed by the system or the community team. You may vote for any posts you find helpful, or search the Community for additional answers.

Apogee Rosetta vs. Metric Halo 2882

Welcome to Apple Support Community
A forum where Apple customers help each other with their products. Get started with your Apple Account.