"Some creatures actually work together and cooperate with each other."
But that's exactly what I said. Working together and cooperating is the same as working collectively.
It's pretty easy to say you would rather die yourself than harm another, but it's a rare circumstance when one's own survival is sublimated to a philosophical ideal. Bear in mind that millions of Germans protected themselves rather than take action because their individual survival was at stake.
We did no make Iran what it is today. Iranians did. We did not make Iraq what it is today nor India nor Pakistan, etc. The people made choices. When they didn't like the Shah they kicked him out. When they didn't like Sadam Hussain they looked to us to kick him out. Regardless of what dictatorship exists the people do not rise up against their own tyranny because of their individual fear of death. Hence, it's easier to let terrorists do their work in the West than risk their own lives to save ours. If people really were as you would like them to be (and I have no problem with the ideal) there could not have been a 9/11.
Bush became president because he was elected by the majority. People chose him regardless of the opposition, and they did it twice in a row. If he truly was the lesser of two evils, then imagine how awful it would have been if the country elected the democratic candidate? If the democratic candidate was better than Bush, then why wasn't he elected? It's easy to blame Bush for all the bad things unliked about his 8 years in office, but presidents can't do much on their own. Congress and the judiciary are supposed to provide limits on presidential power. Bush could not wage a war in Iraq had Congress not given it's nod of approval. And Congress doesn't act without consideration of reelection meaning they reflect what the voting public wants. When the voter doesn't like what he/she gets they express their opinion at the polls.
Obame won over a weak republican candidate who waged a weak campaign. A better candidate may have put the republicans in the White House for another four years. Obama may reflect the will of the people, but most likely he, too, was simply the lesser of two evils. The voters didn't like Bush, so they elected Obama. Fortunately for Obama he was actually running against Bush in absentia.
Yes, it's a Darwinistc view of the world because evolution defines our world. Can't blame it all on Darwin because thousands of years ago Darwin hadn't been born. We did all that on our own without Darwin or his text on evolution. And, yes, it is an animalistic view because we are all animals.
Love thy neighbor as you love thyself is a proverb from Western religions. Religion - the so called harbinger of love and altruism - has wrought more death and destruction in the name of God than any government. And everyone thinks God is on their side to make right whatever they do - but only if they are successful.
OK, we're now tailing into forbidden areas for the Discussions. I'd hate to see this all suddenly disappear when the moderators make their choices.
