Want to highlight a helpful answer? Upvote!

Did someone help you, or did an answer or User Tip resolve your issue? Upvote by selecting the upvote arrow. Your feedback helps others! Learn more about when to upvote >

Looks like no one’s replied in a while. To start the conversation again, simply ask a new question.

Sluggish Animations?

Has anyone else noticed that when you switch between spaces, the animation is very choppy compared to 10.5? This is one of a few system animations that seems to suffer from sluggishness. I'm on a 15" unibody, 4gigs, with the 9600GT enabled, so it's not like I'm running a low end system...

Unibody 15" Macbook Pro 2.4, iBook with faulty logic board ;), 16gb iPhone 3G, Mac OS X (10.6)

Posted on Aug 28, 2009 3:18 PM

Reply
172 replies

Sep 2, 2009 6:49 AM in response to sacredgeometry

Oh I definitly agree there are equally as important bugs to fix! Most probably even bigger ones! And I do hope Apple takes those bugs more seriously than this problem. What I was trying to say, though, is that I hope Apple will not classify as an un-important 'bug' and eventually leaving it till 10.6.5 or something. Like I said, this takes away a huge part of the whole Mac experience for me.

Message was edited by: W-out - (typo's)

Sep 3, 2009 4:49 AM in response to tonykunda

It looks like this problem mostly persist on late 2008 unibody macbook pro's, and some other devices with the 9400M chipset/graphics card. Although I can't image the 9400M being the problem, as when I go into 'High Performance' mode and thus activate the 9600M GT, the problem still persists. Even though it's a tad bit faster while using the 9600M GT, it's still choppy.
Also, my brother's Macbook (polycarbonate white one) which also has a 9400M chipset/graphics card, runs as smooth as a hot knife through butter.

Maybe it's some combination of hardware? Has anyone that's experiencing this slowness upgraded their RAM by any chance? As I did, I put 2x Crucial DDR3 SO-DIMM 1066MHz 2GB in my Macbook Pro (more stats below). I had no problems using the ram though, my macbook pro sleeps and awakes just fine. What about all of you? Maybe we can figure this out.

Sep 3, 2009 5:10 AM in response to sacredgeometry

Hm, ok that's interesting.
Well, the only thing I see we all have in common here is that every mac with this problem uses the 9400M Chipset (which is also used when activating the 9600M GT)
But as I mentioned before, my brothers polycarbonate Macbook with the 9400M chipset runs just fine... (edit: Yes, with Snow Leopard)

Sep 3, 2009 5:11 AM in response to W-out

yeah that is odd it doesnt seem to make any difference which chip im running on its still nothing like as smooth as 10.5.8 and theres no graphical difference really, i mean surely if they rewrote it in cocoa it might even be faster :S i guess its just a conflict somwhere....i would have though they would have at least done more tesing on their current line of laptops :S i have heard this issue on mac pros as well so its not isolated to the nvidia chips

Sep 3, 2009 5:21 AM in response to sacredgeometry

Hi,

In the phoronix report I posted the link to in a previous posting,

<http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=article&item=macosx 106benchmarks&num=1>

they used mac minis. An older one with an intel graphics chipset, and a newer one with an NVIDIA GeForce 9400M. Both seem to show the same regression in opengl performance going from 10.5.8 to 10.6.0.

They don't explicitly mention the same sort of issue we are discussing here, but its not much of a stretch to assume they could be related.

In another report they compare OSX 10.6 to various ubuntu releases.

<http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=article&item=ubuntu karmicleopard&num=1>

frankly, some of the comparisons Apple should be ashammed of, they are that bad...

( Phonorix aren't the be all and end all of course, but I think they comparisons are good enough to mean something )

Sep 3, 2009 5:46 AM in response to sacredgeometry

It's worst for me on the animations that have actually been re-done like Exposé, and spaces. Actually, was 'Spaces' re-done in snow leopard? Not sure, but Stacks are still reasonably smooth for me, not super smooth, but it never was super smooth in 10.5.8 either.
Normal stuff like simply dragging a window around and scrolling is still super smooth for me.
The link, mentioned earlier to some benchmark article, says Apple is aware of this (or a similar) issue? Are they really? Should we report this somewhere or will Apple notice this thread themselves? It would just be nice to know if it's worth discussing this any further if Apple's already put this on their list of 'problems' or not.

*edit: Didn't see the posts above as I was actually typing this post, made some small edits to correct it.

Sep 3, 2009 5:47 AM in response to W-out

The comment about Apple "being aware" was in one of the comparison links I posted. That is all it is, just a comment and we have to it at face value.

You are correct, we don't really know what Apple thinks of this, or even if they are aware. As is the way with Apple they are a black hole when it comes to support issues sometimes... Things go in, nothing comes out.

I agree, if there was some official way to send feedback, that might help, if we all did... I've only ever used the automatic crash report thing, which doesn't really help here.

Sep 3, 2009 5:52 AM in response to ChrisJones051073

well yeah apple are a bit secretive one what will or not be in future updates so until they are released we are left guessing if they know or not haha but either way its only some mild anoyances and performance issues that need to be ironed out and this could be an amazing os......please god dont turn into a me/vists :S ....i doubt it i mean leopard was the same, tiger was the same ...and so on and so forth it will get fixed and by 10.6.8 it will be silky smooth haha and by that time sabertooth tiger will be out :S what ever they call it 😀

Sluggish Animations?

Welcome to Apple Support Community
A forum where Apple customers help each other with their products. Get started with your Apple ID.