Looks like no one’s replied in a while. To start the conversation again, simply ask a new question.

Warning! Using SuperDuper to clone from an HDD to an SSD might seriously da

WARNING! USING SUPERDUPER TO CLONE FROM AN HDD TO AN SSD MIGHT SERIOUSLY DAMAGE THE HEALTH OF YOUR SSD!

This is the new thread which I referred to when replying to:
http://discussions.apple.com/thread.jspa?threadID=2274972&start=0&tstart=0

I used SuperDuper to clone from a VelociRaptor 300GB HDD to an OCZ Agility EX SLC SSD, with disastrous results.

To save me the time of rewriting all the events please refer to the following emails and online submissions:

******************************************************************************** *********************

(Biltan-Wales - 21 Dec 2009 - 11.02 GMT):-

After reading several very favourable product reviews of the above SSD, I have just purchased one from Aria Technology Ltd., to use as a boot drive for my (early 2009) 8-Core 2.93GHz Intel Xeon Nehalem desktop workstation.

Also, prior to purchase of an OCZ SSD, I posted a question on Apple's Discussions' Forum:
http://discussions.apple.com/thread.jspa?threadID=2263023&tstart=0

From the response to this, and from reading several other threads regarding SSDs, I found that several Mac Pro owners are using OCZ SSDs as boot drives, and in some cases employing up to 3 of them.

I received my Agility EX from Aria on 16th. December, and yesterday afternoon I decided to set up my boot drive and 4 drive RAID 0, as described in: http://discussions.apple.com/thread.jspa?threadID=2263023&tstart=0

First of all I used SuperDuper to clone from my VelociRaptor 300GB drive in Bay 1, to my original Apple (WD) 640GB drive in Bay 2.

Then I removed the original Apple drive, and installed it in an ONNTO dataTale TQ-M12H external single enclosure, using a Firewire 800 interface connection. Next I selected this as my boot drive to check it would boot OK, restarted my system, and there was no problem.

So my next step was to install the Agility EX, and another 3 VelociRaptor 300GB drives, in the Mac pro workstation.

First, I reselected VelociRaptor 1 as my boot drive, so that I could use SuperDuper to clone to the Agility EX.

The Agility EX was installed in the lower of the 2 optical bays, and was connected to the pre-wired SATA and power cable, and the VelociRaptors were placed in hard drive bays 2, 3, and 4.

I then started up the Mac Pro, and there were 4 message boxes on the desktop, requesting that the drives should be initialised. So then I used Disk Utility to initialise the 4 drives. The SSD was named "Agility EX Boot", and the others "VelociRaptor 2", VelociRaptor 3, and VelociRaptor 4". The Mac system accepted all 4, and mounted desk top icons for each drive. I cannot remember the exact figure, but the Agility EX was listed as approx. 64GB in Disk Utility after its initialisation. All 4 VelociRaptors are shown as 300.07GB. All drives were formatted as Mac OS Extended (Journaled).

The next stage was to use SuperDuper to clone from VelociRaptor 1 to the Agility EX Boot drive.

Everything was fine until 28.00GB had been copied, and then nothing more would copy. The total to be cloned was just under 30GB, which should not have been a problem with a SSD disk capacity of approx. 64GB, but everything was frozen at that point - exactly 28.00GB!

Eventually, my only option was to stop the process, and quit Super Duper.

Then I restarted the system to try again, but this is where there is a real problem now!

My system does not recognise the Agility EX at all now! Also, it is no longer listed in Disk Utility!

The system does not even acknowledge its existence! It is not even shown on the desktop at start-up, whereas I thought that perhaps there might have been another message box requesting that it should be reinitialised.

I tried disconnecting and reconnecting everything - all drives, interface connections, power cables etc., but to no avail!

This morning I tried this again, but still I cannot get my system to even acknowledge the Agility EX, let alone list it!

So at the moment I am still using VelociRaptor 1 as my boot drive, and, in fact, as my main drive, because I am reluctant to use it with the 3 other VelociRaptors as a 4 drive RAID 0 set up until I get this problem with the Agility EX resolved.

******************************************************************************** *********************

(OCZ - 22 Dec 2009 - 18.29 GMT):-

Cloning from a HDD to an SSD is very problematic. I strongly recommend against doing this. Instead you will want to just install normally onto the SSD. You can clone from SSD to SSD, or from HDD to HDD, but going from one to the other can cause issues.

Try disconnecting the drive from the computer for an hour or so. This will allow all power in the drive to fully discharge. This is a way of resetting the drive that can usually recover the drive. Then plug the drive back in. Does the drive show up again?

If so, delete the partition on the drive, then create a new partition and then install the OS onto it clean rather than clone the OS onto the drive. That should resolve the issues you are having.

******************************************************************************** *********************

(Biltan-Wales - 23 Dec 2009 - 16.19 GMT):-

Thank you for your advice.

I have now disconnected the Agility EX SSD, and removed it from my Mac Pro's lower optical bay.

As Christmas is imminent, and I will not be using my system very much over the next few days, I will leave the drive for 4 to 5 days to allow ample time for all the power to discharge.

Then I will reconnect it, and I will let you know whether or not the drive is recognised by my system.

I was not aware that cloning from a HDD to an SSD could be problematic. Several threads on the Apple Support Discussion Forum have recommended using SuperDuper or Carbon Copy Cloner for this purpose. SuperDuper is the preferred option of most Forum members, whereas Lloyd Chambers (diglloyd.com), author of "macperformanceguide.com", uses Carbon Copy Cloner to clone his HDD boot drives to his Intel and Crucial SSDs.

After the Agility EX had been set up as my system boot drive, my intention was to use SuperDuper to clone from it to my original Apple (WD) HDD, now in an external enclosure with Firewire 800 interface, and then use SuperDuper's Smart Update for regular backups, so that I always had an up to date spare boot drive for the OS and applications.

The current VelociRaptor 1 boot drive would then be erased, and I would then use the Mac OS Disk Utility to create a 4 drive software RAID ) with the other 3 VelociRaptors, and this would be backed up using Time Machine to my existing WD My Book Studio Edition II 2TB External Hard Drive.

Please correct me if I have misunderstood your advice, but are you saying that I should only use another SSD, and not my original Apple (WD) HDD, as my back-up external boot drive? I don't know of any other Mac users who are using SSDs for that purpose, possibly because of the prohibitive cost of doing so.

I am more than happy to follow your advice to reinstall the Mac OS and my applications cleanly onto the Agility EX, and, in fact, I did exactly that with my first VelociRaptor HDD, before I had SuperDuper. However, that would still leave me with the problem of how to set up and maintain an external back-up system boot drive, without incurring the expense of another SSD. Any suggestions please?

Anyway the most important matter is the existing problem, and I am hoping that following your advice will resolve this.

I will contact you again early next week. In the meantime have a very enjoyable Christmas!

******************************************************************************** *********************

(OCZ - 24 Dec 2009 - 00.25 GMT):-

If the image is of an HDD and that image is then cloned onto an SSD that does tend to be problematic. I do not recommend doing this, as an image of the HDD somewhat regularly does fail to copy onto an SSD and still remain functional or fast.

You can store the image file on any sort of drive. Storing the image file is fine, as that is just a digital file, so the storage medium doesn't matter. Its actually applying that image to a drive is where the problems often occur.

You can image from a HDD to a HDD just fine, or an SSD to an SSD just fine, but going from one to the other is problematic enough that I recommend not doing this. Sometimes it works just fine, but other times it can fail catastrophically to the point of even bricking the drive. To error on the side of caution I recommend just going a clean install on the new SSD.

Once you have that clean install done you can then take an image of that SSD and image on to other SSD's, or store the image on a HDD for backup purposes.

******************************************************************************** *********************

(Biltan-Wales - 29 Dec 2009 - 13.16 GMT)

Thank you for your last email.

Further to your previous email, and my reply of 23/12/2009. this morning I reconnected the Agility EX SSD.

However, unfortunately, the drive has not showed up again on my system. There is no icon for it on the desktop, nor is it listed in Disk utility.

When I checked Serial-ATAS in my Mac Pro's System Profiler, all 6 Intel ICH10 AHCI are listed in the Serial-ATA Device Tree, but, whereas all my other drives are sub-listed, there is nothing underneath the ICH10 AHCI for the lower optical bay.

As the drive has had 6 days to discharge and reset, it would appear that it has not recovered.

Where do I go from here?

******************************************************************************** *********************


I am still awaiting a reply from OCZ, but that is not surprising, because of the different time zones and the Christmas?New Year holiday period.

In the meantime does anybody else have any ideas, please?

8-Core 2.93Ghz Nehalem Mac Pro, Mac OS X (10.6.2), 16GB/VR300/HD4870/SE II 2TB/NEC3090WQXi/Epson V750/Epson 3880

Posted on Dec 29, 2009 7:14 AM

Reply
63 replies

Feb 1, 2010 6:19 AM in response to Biltan-Wales

Hi Bill,

I think OCZ has a lot of pots on the stove. I also thought I heard that they themselves were trying to develop a Sandforce based model.
I just sent an email to OWC to ask about their overseas shipping because I could only find this link. But that link does bode well, pretty much 99.9%, that they ship to the UK.
http://eshop.macsales.com/Search/displayFAQDetails.cfm?ID=522

If I were to get another SSD today I would get that one, and for a few reasons. One most obviously the speed. Maybe two, but definitely three would get one the fastest i/o speeds the 09's are capable of, around 750mb/sec. And that's blazing. And if one were to get only one, that's definitely the one I would choose for speed.

Second, it looks like they've made great strides in making SSD's last longer. This one looks like it may well last a lifetimes worth of use. I knew going into getting mine they wouldn't, and this is the first I've seen that looks like it may.

Third, I can't overstate how good this company is. They are really well known here by Mac owners (they are one of the few places almost dedicated entirely to Macs). Their products and prices are excellent. Their customer and technical support are as well. And despite how successful and profitable this company has become, it is not hard to get in touch with the owner, Larry himself, should you have a concern. And he's a really nice guy.

The company is a rare bird these days, bucking the trends of the prevailing business world and proving that a company can just follow the good old rules of excellent quality, excellent prices and excellent customer support and still, and because of that, make a successful business and a good profit.
Yes, I've spent thousands there and have never had a glitch... amazing to me.

But, this in particular is a new product, based on new tech, and hasn't been out there long enough to have been tested or gotten much feedback on. Still... I'd get it as is if I could.

And the $20 mounts are pretty cool, I paid almost 50 each for 4 for my MP.

Well, something to keep in mind anyway. You're not done with your OCZ travails yet. I still can't imagine what the heck is going on with them and the Agility, but I have to say I admire your patience.
Funny (not really), I wonder if the problems you had are related to why they can't be found?

Bill, something to consider and it may not be possible and I'm certainly not making a demand of you to try... But... consider contacting the Moderators and getting SuperDuper removed from your Subject line. It doesn't look like it's been involved in any of this, it's a product that many of us here recommend on an almost daily basis and except for you, i don't know of anyone else who has talked about it doing anything bad. In fact quite the opposite. It's almost universally praised here and new users coming along shouldn't see that subject line and have doubts about it. Your call.

Good luck there,
Steve

Feb 1, 2010 8:46 AM in response to Biltan-Wales

Here is a blog article describing how I moved my data (and separated OS/User data) using SuperDupper!...

http://blog.ramsesmoya.com/files/Howadd_configure_SSD_2_Mac_Pro_w_SnowLeopard.php

That worked quite well for me and the scripts made is simple to divide the data... Not sure why OCZ said that it would not work for you... I think they were just confused... 😀

RM

Feb 1, 2010 9:32 AM in response to Ramses Moya

I have three of their drives. In dealing with OCZ all I can say is they are definitely on the "Mac-Ignorant" side. The tech that replied to him though was just plain ignorant.

I think Biltan probably did just fine with Superduper. It will turn out that using SD was just coincidental to a faulty drive. If I were new to cloning and SSD's at the same time also, I probably would have made the same connections in my mind that Biltan did.
Shame though with everything so far,... that drive was one of the best SSDs out there. And now the delay in getting this addressed, all OCZ's fault, has ruined what should have been a great experience.

I love my Vertex(es?). Read/Write is fantastic. Today I'd go for the one I linked to above though.

Feb 2, 2010 10:02 AM in response to Samsara

Hi Guys,

Just a very quick update.

My replacement SSD has been shipped, by Fedex, from the USA today, and I have the tracking number to keep tabs on it. ETA according to their site is the 8th. February.

Guess what?

I am not getting another Agility EX!

Instead, they have sent me a top of the range Vertex EX!

The UK Sales Manager sorted out the replacement for me, and advised me in an email very early this morning:

******************************************************************************** *********************
Apologies for the delay, but the Agility EX has recently been discontinued.

We have therefore shipped you a OCZSSD2-1VTXEX60G as an alternative, which is a superior SSD.

The spec can be found at:
http://www.ocztechnology.com/products/solidstate_drives/ocz_vertex_ex_series_sata_ii_25-ssd

It has been shipped from the USA, so should be with you by the end of the week.

Hope this resolves the situation to your satisfaction.
******************************************************************************** *********************

I also received a reply late yesterday evening from the OCZ Support guy I emailed:

******************************************************************************** *********************
There are no major problems, but we are not going to make anymore of the drives. We have discontinued the Agility EX series.
******************************************************************************** *********************

The Agility Ex has only been available for a few months, and, personally, I wonder whether there was a problem with the Intel chips, because one of the many reviews, which I read prior to purchasing the Agility EX, had this to say:

******************************************************************************** *********************
Now we get to the interesting twist. Unlike every other Indilinx based SSD we have looked at, this drive does not use Samsung NAND chips. To be precise the Agility EX 60GB uses Intel 29F32G08FANC1 Single Layer Cell NAND chips. While Intel is not exactly as free with their specifications as Samsung is, what we do know is these chips are 50NM 32gigaBIT (4GB) chips. We also know that OCZ uses mixed batches in the same drive as ours had 090415 for the back 8 chips and 090815 for the front eight chips. This is not the first time OCZ has used Intel NAND chips as their MLC Agility model is also purported to use Intel but it is interesting that OCZ felt the need to outsource to Intel considering their supposedly strong relationship with Samsung.
******************************************************************************** ********************

Thanks to Samsara and Ramses Moya for your posts since I last visited this thread.

I will reply another day, because I've gotta go now!

Feb 3, 2010 12:57 AM in response to Samsara

Hi Guys,

In answer to my question to the OCZ Support guy, asking "Was the problem related to the Intel 29F32G08FANC1 Single Layer Cell NAND chips?", I have received the following reply from him:

******************************************************************************** ***********************
We no longer get the Nand that is on the drive, not that there is anything wrong, we just don't have a competitive source for it.
******************************************************************************** ***********************

This sounds like a reasonable explanation to me, because the Agility EX was extremely competitively priced compared to other Single Level (Layer) Cell SSDs.

The Vertex EX Single Level Cell SSD, which OCZ are sending me as a replacement, is a **** of a lot more expensive.

Despite scouring the internet for reports of problems regarding the Agility EX, I have unearthed very little apart from some relating to Windows 7.

I found this review, which I had not come across before, very interesting:
http://it-review.net/article/hardware/hdd/OCZAgility_SSD_performancereview&2

Now I must find out from the OCZ support guy whether or not my Vertex EX will have been shipped with the latest firmware.

The guy who wrote the above review last October recommended v1.41 for OS10 and Linux users, but I see that v1.5 became available on 20th. January.

Feb 3, 2010 1:01 AM in response to Biltan-Wales

******************************************************************************** ***********************
The Vertex EX Single Level Cell SSD, which OCZ are sending me as a replacement, is a ** of a lot more expensive.
******************************************************************************** ***********************

I cannot believe that they censored this ** four letter word!

It was only the opposite to "Heaven"!

You know! That place down below, where all Windows users are destined to go!

Ha! Ha!

Feb 3, 2010 4:42 AM in response to Biltan-Wales

Hi Bill,

Unlike my 1st gen Intels, I haven't been able to update the firmware on my OCZ's. I thought it was my fault for doing something wrong but in one article I read it's simply not something one can do on their 09 MPs. The iso disk one downloads then burns to a disk to begin the update process simply won't boot on our Macs. And if we can't boot from it, we can't update it.
I'd think there was a good chance though that they are sending you an updated disk. Even if it's a 1.4 disk is better than 1.3 which is where I am.
You'll find out what revision it is when you click on the drive in System Profiler. It's nice that they are doing what they are, it would be even nicer if they gave you the 120gb over the 60gb, but that's probably asking for a bit too much. Still, you had the 80gb Agility... maybe that gives you a little bargaining power...

Anyway, good going for hanging in there and it's good OCZ is doing this, it's only fair. Let us know how everything works out. Good to see some good news for a change.
🙂

Edit: I've seen H**k edited out. No biggy.

Message was edited by: Samsara

Feb 3, 2010 7:13 AM in response to Samsara

Hi Steve,

Yes, it would have been even nicer if they had given me the 120Gb over the 60GB.

However, my Agility EX was only 60GB (not 80GB), and so that would have been expecting too much.

I am happy with a 60GB Vertex EX, which is a lot more expensive than the 60GB Agility EX was.

It had better be a new one though!

Not a reconditioned one!

Your comments about firmware updates and 09 MPs are interesting.

I hope that the Vertex EX is v1.41, which has Garbage Collection, whereas v1.4 has TRIM support.

It will be interesting to see what the OCZ Support guy has to say in response to the following email, which I sent earlier today:

******************************************************************************** ***********************
Many thanks for clarifying the situation regarding the Agility EX and the Intel Nand.

Do you know what firmware version the replacement Vertex EX will have been shipped with?

The review below recommended v1.41 for Mac users, but it was written last October, and I see that v1.5 became available on 20th. January:
http://it-review.net/article/hardware/hdd/OCZAgility_SSD_performancereview&2

Which firmware version would you recommend for an 8 Core 2.93Ghz Nehalem Mac Pro running OS10.6.2?

I do not use, and never will be using, Windows 7, or indeed any Windows OS or Microsoft/third party Windows software at all.

Many thanks.
******************************************************************************** ***********************

Feb 3, 2010 7:36 AM in response to Biltan-Wales

The 1.41 had a more aggressive GC than the 1.40 - but they both have them (the GC I think was added on 1.4 but it was a mild collection). Garbage Collection and the block clearing (for which the TRIM support is for) are two things that we should have at the same time. (the address two separate issues) I think the GC was tuned down a bit on subsequent firmwares as they had turned it into a bit aggressive and the dive spent too much time doing the collection... Or at least that is what I remember reading...

Check the OCZ site - I think they are on 1.50 now... Not sure what improvements they have done but it would be interesting to check it out...

On my Intel - the firmware update from last Nov increased the performance - about 25% faster. No new features (still have TRIM and GC) but the performance increase was nice.

As always, you should wait a bit and see what other people experience with the firmware before jumping in 😀

Feb 3, 2010 8:38 AM in response to Biltan-Wales

"WARNING! USING SUPERDUPER TO CLONE FROM AN HDD TO AN SSD MIGHT SERIOUSLY DAMAGE THE HEALTH OF YOUR SSD!"

That's a rather alarmist global message based on the experience of one person with one specific SSHD.

I have an Air with a ssd. I use SuperDuper. As part of my yearly maintenance (defrag) I have SuperDuper erase the drive and copy the clone back in, then run Disk Warrior to correct the disk creation date. I've only done it once so far but the Air runs just fine.

I'd suggest you look at your own specific install before posting warnings like this.

Message was edited by: HR

Feb 4, 2010 2:58 AM in response to Ramses Moya

Thanks for the clarification of the differences between 1.40 and 1.41.

******************************************************************************** ***********************
On my Intel - the firmware update from last Nov increased the performance - about 25% faster. No new features (still have TRIM and GC) but the performance increase was nice.
******************************************************************************** ***********************

I was intrigued by the above statement, because Samsara had posted these comments earlier:

******************************************************************************** ***********************
Unlike my 1st gen Intels, I haven't been able to update the firmware on my OCZ's. I thought it was my fault for doing something wrong but in one article I read it's simply not something one can do on their 09 MPs. The iso disk one downloads then burns to a disk to begin the update process simply won't boot on our Macs. And if we can't boot from it, we can't update it.
******************************************************************************** ***********************

How do you manage to carry out the firmware updates, please?

Feb 4, 2010 3:16 AM in response to HR

The keyword in my message was "MIGHT", and it was not based just upon the experience of one person with one specific SSD.

If you had read my opening to this thread thread properly, you would have seen that it was based upon this advice from one of the foremost manufacturers of SSDs:

******************************************************************************** ***********************
(OCZ - 22 Dec 2009 - 18.29 GMT):-

Cloning from a HDD to an SSD is very problematic. I strongly recommend against doing this. Instead you will want to just install normally onto the SSD. You can clone from SSD to SSD, or from HDD to HDD, but going from one to the other can cause issues.
******************************************************************************** ***********************

If you have an issue with that advice, then I suggest that you take the matter up with OCZ on their Forum.

Talk about "the pot calling the kettle black":

******************************************************************************** ***********************
I've only done it once so far but the Air runs just fine.
******************************************************************************** ***********************

I'd suggest that you base your reply upon more than just one experience!

Feb 4, 2010 3:40 AM in response to Ramses Moya

Hi Ramses Moya,

I have finally had time to thoroughly view your blog article:
http://blog.ramsesmoya.com/files/Howadd_configure_SSD_2_Mac_Pro_w_SnowLeopard.php

It was very interesting, especially as I will be setting up a 4 drive RAID 0, using VelociRaptor 300GBs, as soon as I have set up the (currently en-route) Vertex EX SSD as my system boot drive.

However, I will not tempt providence, and I will do a clean install of the OS and applications onto the SSD on this occasion.

Should there be any problems, I don't think that OCZ would be very keen to replace the Vertex EX if I had cloned from an HDD to a SSD, after they had previously advised me against doing this.

So, regardless of whether or not there is any substance to their warning, I will play safe on this occasion.

Warning! Using SuperDuper to clone from an HDD to an SSD might seriously da

Welcome to Apple Support Community
A forum where Apple customers help each other with their products. Get started with your Apple ID.