JerryWasatch wrote:
.. My prime concern is captured video quality which is probably "identical" between the two programs. ..
the quality IS identically.
FC doesn't add any value due to its method to 'split' the data-stream into separate 'tracks' of audio and video on import. the number of bits&bytes concerning the video is identically. it is just an internal difference in engineering how the two apps handle that stream ..-
a last word about 'quality':
usually, I don't participate any more in quality-debates - for me, in 99% cases it's academically 😉
your source, you told us, is Hi8.. so, due to techniqués avail that time, the recordings are far far away from the tech max, the codec DV allows. it starts with thee optics, the CCD, the internal electronics, the compresssion-techniqués, .. nor do I doubt, the recordings were done under 100% perfection in lighting, tripod etc.pp.
example: I once were allowed to record with my miniDV a few minutes in a professional TV-set - breathtaking! and far far away from Daddy's recording last Xmas under low-light candle-light conditions .. 😉
what I want to say: I understand concerns about 'quality', but the 'usual suspects' (=iM, FC, Premiere..) don't lower any quality, which isn't on the tapes anyhow..
sorry for venting.. 😉