Mr leroydouglas,
I presume you haven't yet understood how serious this "issue" is. It's a huge problem considering the fact that Time Machine is no longer reliably backing up everything it needs to back up and tells the user it is going to back up (the "Estimated size of full backup"). Perhaps losing 100GB of content of *your* internal drive is not an issue for *you*, but considering there is almost 15 years of work on *my* fusion drive and Time Machine is no longer backing it all up, I see this as a serious bug inside an OS that millions of us are using and have to rely upon.
That sufficiently answers your first question. Your second question puzzles me even more. Of course, Time Machine "missing" 100GB out of 300GB to be backed up, has a serious impact on the initial backup because that one and all consecutive, incremental backups, are simply incomplete and can thus not be relied upon. In other words, Time Machine has just become totally useless.
I must admit that your comment that "it is best to let Time Machine do its thing", made me laugh out loud. I used to work as a support engineer for one of the biggest software companies out there, and I can assure you that letting software programs ("apps" as they are now so cutely called) do their own thing without checking that they are doing that "thing" consistently and reliably, was the mother of all computer disasters and often also of the loss of years of hard work.
I didn't try and "second guess" the "magic behind the curtain". I followed a series of facts and used logic to come to the conclusion that Time Machine is not backing up the whole drive of my iMac, missing one third (!) of the "Estimated size of full backup". There is no such thing as magic in software, but I will admit there are nowadays many curtains (way too many) to hide serious mistakes from being taken care of.
Again, you are mistaken. I do not "think" that Time Machine is missing 100GB, I have actual and factual proof, looking at the total size of all files on my Fusion Drive and the total size on Time Machine's backup drive - telling me there is 100GB less on the backup drive. And no, this is not due to cache files or such, I have checked everything out long before I posted about this huge problem. And actually, yes, I did start with a newly formatted backup drive. And no, I'm not going to start anything anew because I have work to do and debugging software made by Apple is not part of that, I'm afraid.
Your links have absolutely nothing to do with the problem I posted about. And thank you for giving me advice not to rely on Time Machine as the only backup solution. You will understand that I'm not a beginner in computing and that I do make a bootable copy of the internal drive of my computers at regular intervals - however not every hour, nor every day.
In short: I need Time Machine to backup everything it is supposed to back up, and the huge discrepancy of 100 (one hundred!) GB needs a far better explanation than "it's Time Machine doing its magic behind the curtain". I don't need a magician, I need an operating system that works flawlessly, especially when it comes to creating and managing backups.