Increasing bit rate of iTunes songs ripped from CDs?

Hi - I'm struggling with a problem "upgrading" my iTunes library. It consists of about 25GB of music, maybe 15GB of which was ripped years ago from my huge CD collection, and the remaining 10GB from iTunes purchases over the past 20 years. What I want to do is get rid of my CDs for space reasons, but before I do, I want to capture the highest bit rate I can in iTunes to get the best sound quality, without going to extremes.


I notice if I look at songs from older CDs that I ripped many years ago, take Springsteen's Born to Run as an example (CD dates from mid-'80s), the songs in my Library are all 128 bit rate. No doubt they would sound better in 256. I suppose I ripped it in 128 AAC many years ago without really knowing what I was doing, or to save space back when PC and iPod memory wasn't what it is today.


So should I delete this album from my Library and re-rip it at 256 bit, is that the only way to improve the sound quality? I know I can also rip lossless, but I'm not sure I'll be able to tell the difference, and I don't know if lossless songs can co-exist in my Library with 256 or 128 bit songs? Also, I assume re-ripping those 1000+ CDs in lossless would increase the PC storage needs from 25GB to over 500GB? Which again, I'm not sure I can tell the difference enough to warrant the space needs.


So looking for advice - is it worthwhile to re-rip them in 256-bit and forget about lossless, and will there be enough gain in fidelity to make it worth the hassle? I like iTunes as a music library, but I don't like having too much compression affecting the sound quality. Thanks!

Windows, Windows 6

Posted on Jun 18, 2020 3:09 AM

Reply

Similar questions

11 replies

Jun 19, 2020 2:25 AM in response to CMB62

First of all, don't over-worry about what can go wrong. I added it in order to help you, not hinder or put you off. Apologies if it has - change your mind about this as soon as you can.


I've upgraded some of my albums to a higher bit rate, often changing them to mp3 at the same time. So to answer one of your questions, yes, an iTunes Library has no issues at all with mixed formats, nor do iPods. I have mp3, aac, wav (experimental use only), Apple Lossless (which is why I know they don't play on some Android players) in my Library and on my iPod. I also have some flac files, but iTunes cannot even import those, so I had to create new versions first, by using another programme.


My usual practice is to import over the existing copy. This not only protects a song's place in Playlists, but as mentioned, play counts and star ratings, both of which I make use of for Smart Playlists*. Because I made the mistake of renaming some albums, whenever I re-import one of those I have to check album titles in order to prevent creating a second copy under the original title. That's why I know what can go wrong, but also, how easy it is to sort it out. There's another benefit to copying over the top. If you re-import over the top of the existing copy, you don't have to delete the old copy. But if you delete and re-rip, that's an extra task. What a faff, why bother with that?


Try it.


As a test, just try with one album, to see how you get on. The very worst that could happen is you manage to lose both the old and the new copy (although it's difficult to see how). If that happens, simply import the CD from scratch. If less than the worst goes wrong, I've given you tips on how to fix it. To quote (ironically) a bold statement from a film (which The Simpson's nicked): "nothing can possibly go wrong". Once you see that it works, try another one.


Back to your point about file sizes: a one hour album in Apple Lossless is 60MB, so about the same as the mp3 or aac version, not the size of the CD version. But as stated, I recommend not using Apple Lossless, no matter how much you think you'll stay with Apple forever. For example, can the Brennan play Apple Lossless? (I don't know, although I am aware of their players.)


You made the point about the capacity of your nano having limited capacity. That's an easy one to solve. (Well, it involves setting up, but there's minimal maintenance once you do.)


Let's assume that you don't want to hear all the same songs every day, but instead, you would like a variety. Perhaps, songs you like a lot are available on your iPod every day, while your less favourite songs are removed form the iPod after you've heard them, and not put back onto the iPod for a while. This is achieved by Syncing with your iTunes Library. So after each Sync with iTunes, your iPod would have a sightly different selection of music on it; favourites and some music you haven't heard for a while.


Such an amazing feat is achieved by using Smart Playlists (did you notice the asterisk up above?)


* A Smart Playlist can be created which removes songs after they've been played and only puts them back after a period you choose has elapsed. The same Playlist can keep favourite songs in it all the time. You then use that Playlist to synchronise with your iPod, and it removes and adds songs as dictated by that Smart Playlist. Fret not though - you can still play the music on your iPod in any way that you currently use. For example, that favourite album can be played from beginning to end just like playing the CD. Nothing else will play. You can (if you so wish) select a particular genre and play every song (currently on your iPod) of that genre, without hearing any other genre. Or of course, you can simply set the nano to play songs in shuffle mode, choosing from every song currently on the iPod. After a further Sync, that iPod has a different selection on it, so every shuffle would be different.


Oh! and each of your iPod can be synchronised independently of the others. Your running iPod can have completely different content to your sit back and relax iPod.

Jun 18, 2020 12:54 PM in response to CMB62

CMB62 wrote:

So should I delete this album from my Library and re-rip it at 256 bit,

Arggh! Don't even think about deleting your existing versions.

No - don't delete things!

And again, no, definitely not.


I trust I've made myself clear. ( I will return to this point later.)


  • A copy of a song at 256Kbps will (or at least, should) sound better than the same song at 128Kbps. That's why digitally purchased versions are usually a minimum of 256Kbps now. Bear in mind though, that a recording from the 1920s (yes, I have some!) may, or may not, sound any better, due to the quality original 1920s source. It will be down to you to decide whether you can detect, hear or even just simply appreciate the difference. It will depend upon:
    • your own hearing, which may get worse as you age
    • the headphones or speakers that you use
    • the individual recording (album). Each recording studio and each producer used their own techniques, which will make a difference
  • Also, consider whether you might one day improve on the headphones or speakers that you use


Also, I assume re-ripping those 1000+ CDs in lossless would increase the PC storage needs from 25GB to over 500GB?

I'm not convinced that's correct. As a test, I created two Smart Playlists of songs as a comparison:

    • with a Bit Rate of 128Kbps, 4745 songs took up 36.57GB. (That'll play for 14 days, 8 hours and 53 minutes)
    • with a Bit Rate of 256Kbps, 4609 songs took up 40.93GB. (This one will play for 14 days, 16 hours and 19 minutes)

So, approximately the same number of songs and roughly the same playing time, but double the amount of storage, not twenty times as large.


So, you should create two copies of each of a few songs, one at 128Kbps and the other at 256Kbps and then compare them. If you appreciate the difference, taking into consideration any future equipment upgrades you might go in for, you might decide to use 256Kbps instead.


Now, it's later, so back to my "point". (You've got to inject a bit of humour, especially in this day and age.)


To upgrade your existing 128Kbps music, simply import the CD again, over the top of the old one, but using 256Kbps or even VBR (Variable Bit Rate). Yes, that's right, just import the CD again without deleting the old copy. Providing the album information is the same (i.e. the album title, song titles and artist name), iTunes will recognise this and ask if you wish to replace the existing copy with the new copy:

    • the advantage of this method is that your Play Counts, star ratings and inclusion in Playlists will be maintained. If you delete the old copy and then import from the CD again, all that will be lost
    • the possible problem is, if you have edited song titles, album titles etc, or the Gracentote database finds updated information for that album, iTunes may treat the re-import as a new album, leaving you with two copies - the old and the new. But fret not, this too can be resolved. It just depends on how much work you are prepared to put in. I'll return to this even later


Which format should you use for the upgrade of your music?

I'm pleased you asked that.

    • MP3 encoder is a good option, since any mp3 player will be able to play it. Notice the clue there? In iTunes, click on Edit/Preferences/General>Import Settings>Import Using:


    • AAC encoder. Apple's propriety format. Most modern audio players (aka mp3 players) can now play AAC files (they will have a file extension of .m4a)


  • I would avoid the AIFF and Apple Lossless encoders, because not all non-Apple players can play them. (Consider your future options). An well-known make of Android phone cannot play Apple Lossless files.
  • do not use .wav because wav files are very large. Basically, it's the same format as on your CD. You might hear a difference, but the increase in storage will be ten times the size of the 128Kbps version and wav files cannot store artwork inside the file. This means that when you transfer the music, the artwork may get lost. I have an album in both 128Kbps AAC format and in wav format. The album plays for 41 minutes and 4 seconds:
    • 128Kbps AAC: 41MB
    • wav: 415.2MB


I'm worn out.


Jun 18, 2020 1:36 PM in response to the fiend

Okay, it's even later now. See, even later comes, eventually.


If you re-import a CD at higher Bit Rate, over the top of an existing 128Kbps version, iTunes will ask you if you wish to replace the existing version because it recognises that the album information is exactly the same, so it must be the same album.


However, this can go wrong for the following reasons:

  • the online database that iTunes uses to identify the album has picked up a revised version of the album. Someone has updated errors in spelling etc. In this case, iTunes will think it's a different album and will therefore create new files, based on the new information, rather than replace the old ones.
  • iTunes finds a new "pressing" of the same album, but which has slightly different information, which causes iTunes to treat it as a different album. The result is the same as above
  • you have edited the album information, which means that iTunes again thinks the new version is a different album. I've edited albums to remove guest artists or correct spelling errors
  • just because... (some inexplicable reason)



If you manage to import a separate copy, do this (I'm assuming that each copy of the album is in its own album-named folder):

  • make sure you know where both the old and the new copies are - and which is which.
  • rename the album folder of the old copy with (for example) a trailing X in the folder name. So Greatest Hits becomes Greatest Hitsx
  • get iTunes to try to play each song. It will fail and put an exclamation mark next to each song as you try it. You can see the exclamation marks easily in the Songs view:


  • for each song, navigate to the new version and select it
  • once you are satisfied that you've got it right, and you therefore don't need the old version any longer, you can safely delete it
  • job done


One last point.


Hard drives (and SSD drives) fail. Back up your music library onto an external drive, preferably one outside your computer.

Jun 19, 2020 2:27 AM in response to CMB62

CMB62 wrote:

And after all that, I guess just one more thing - it seems you are recommending the best approach is just to re-rip the CDs over the top of the existing ones, and the songs should find their way into the correct playlists, and then I can delete the old version of the CD.

If you copy over the top, you won't have to delete the old copy because the re-rip will have done all that for you. iTunes will simply use the new copy and won't even realise that it's not the copy it used before. Therefore, all Playlists will be intact.


Try just one album and see how it works.

Jun 19, 2020 4:29 AM in response to CMB62

Should iTunes not recognize that the CD you're importing is one that you've already imported at some point in the past then you won't get the benefit of the new copy replacing the old, with ratings, playlist membership etc. being preserved. In that case see my DeDuper script which can be set up to keep the largest copy/highest bitrate from a set of duplicates, and will merge ratings, play counts, playlist membership and such to the copy that is kept when the duplicates are eliminated.


tt2

Jun 19, 2020 7:36 AM in response to turingtest2

turingtest2 wrote:

Should iTunes not recognize that the CD you're importing is one that you've already imported at some point in the past then you won't get the benefit of the new copy replacing the old, with ratings, playlist membership etc. being preserved. In that case see my DeDuper script which can be set up to keep the largest copy/highest bitrate from a set of duplicates, and will merge ratings, play counts, playlist membership and such to the copy that is kept when the duplicates are eliminated.

tt2

Thanks for that - shouldn’t be much of an issue for me, as I don’t really use ratings or any of that stuff.


What I have done on occasion is clean up and collate songs from several different albums into a single album I call “Best of” or whatever. Sometimes that creates duplicates or other problems on my devices, but I’ve generally figured out how to edit the “file” section of the song so they all appear as part of a single greatest-hits album of my own making. But most of my albums go into iTunes exactly as how the artist delivered it.

Jun 18, 2020 7:03 PM in response to the fiend

Thank you for the very extensive comments and advice. A few thoughts/questions:


  1. I note your point about not deleting older CD copies and re-ripping them, but is that mainly because of what it will do to Playlists? Otherwise, it seems the alternative you recommend will also be a fair amount of work because of all the things that can go wrong, as you mention. Like having to re-label the new rips with an "x" and then delete the old ones. This will be fairly time-consuming for 1000 CDs. What if I just re-rip it and immediately delete the old version?
  2. My question about storage space was comparing 128 bit to lossless, which I thought was close to CD size files. Perhaps that's not correct. It's logical that 256-bit would roughly double the storage needs of 128-bit. But an uncompressed CD holds about 700MB of data, as I recall, so 1000 CDs would require 700GB of storage if ripped directly from the CD with no compression. I agree that makes no sense.
  3. I take your point about backing up this with an external hard drive, which I already do. I actually considered buying a device that will hold up to 1 TB of songs (called a Brennan B-2 from the UK) and acts as a music server you can plug into your amp or stream wirelessly to your home speakers, and plays your CDs entirely uncompressed if you wish. The problem is that it apparently takes 5-10 minutes per CD to rip the contents, and that seems like a very time-consuming task. I'm not looking for audiophile quality, but I do think I can distinguish between 128 and 256 quality.
  4. Point noted about storing as mp3, but I only use iTunes and iPods, so I'm already pretty locked in to those products. But I note that Apple has already discontinued the Nano, which I really liked (only holds part of my collection), so maybe I should consider mp3. Can mp3 and AAC albums co-exist in the same iTunes library with no issues?
  5. Converting all of my 128 songs into 256 will further reduce what I can fit on my 16GB Nano (I bought a couple of them before they disappeared, because they are great for running, etc., and I don't want music on my phone). But I could use my full-strength iPod to connect to my amp and use it as a server for my home speakers around the house with a better sound quality.

Jun 18, 2020 7:08 PM in response to CMB62

And after all that, I guess just one more thing - it seems you are recommending the best approach is just to re-rip the CDs over the top of the existing ones, and the songs should find their way into the correct playlists, and then I can delete the old version of the CD. While I note that things can occasionally go wrong with this technique, do you think it is the best way to do what I'm trying to do? Thanks.

Jun 19, 2020 7:29 AM in response to the fiend

Perfect, thanks very much. It appears re-ripping some or all CDs at 256-bit will be the best way to go.


I haven’t played around with Smart Playlists much - my solution to the Nano capacity constraints was to create subset playlists within my overall playlists. So I have one folder called Reggae with maybe 5GB, but also one called Reggae2 that is cut down to 2GB of “greatest hits”, and that’s the one that gets copied onto the Nano. Nothing auto-syncs in this system; I drag the full Reggae folder onto my large-capacity iPod, and the cut-down version goes onto the Nano. Seems to work well enough, but if I want to add any new albums to the Nano, of course then I have to remove something.


Thanks again for the advice - you did all the legwork and experimentation for me!


This thread has been closed by the system or the community team. You may vote for any posts you find helpful, or search the Community for additional answers.

Increasing bit rate of iTunes songs ripped from CDs?

Welcome to Apple Support Community
A forum where Apple customers help each other with their products. Get started with your Apple Account.