It’s amazing, KingCrossover, how many, here, are ignoring the fact that the core of the issue is not about appearances, but functionality.
Sure. In both cases (and many others) the attachments are displayed (rendered) inline with text and other features (what so many here refer to an «embedded»). (This is the Internet standard for HTML type rich-text [text/html], that’s been around since the ‘90s.)
However, in all email clients, except one (and its derivatives), you, the user, can perform all bulk attachment operations (such as bulk-saves), regardless how the email client chooses to display (render) the received email.
As I wrote:
«I challenge anyone to find another email client (that isn’t a derivative of Microsoft Outlook) with this flawed handling of your received emails.»