This is laughable. People have compared it to other cell phone cameras, you say the angle is off, people compare to other cheap camera options, you say the lenses are different. You've literally been given all the proof you need in different forms followed by half-baked excuses; you say that people are "incapable of understanding the technology" when you've clearly proven you have no idea how it works in the process. Professional photographers have posted saying it's defective, but nope, not good enough for you either; they must be inept too. Ridiculous... My Pixel 2 has none of these issues, so there goes your theory on how cell phone cameras work.
What is the problem though, which you clearly don't understand, is the type of sapphire used on the iPhone lenses, which has been proven inferior by multiple credible sources. Your fanboy-ism is showing. We all have iPhones, so chill out with that. It's eye-roll worthy. I was actually chatting with Apple support yesterday, and the couple of different departments acknowledged that it seems defective, and that they'd refund or replace the device...we also discussed the two keyboard warriors on here, since I shared a link to this thread, and how "theres always a few of them" followed by a chuckle. So, their acknowledgement is wrong also, I suppose.
Yes, stop trying, because the point is, even if you don't want to call it "defective" it is inferior, regarding the lenses so it seems, which is a shame because the capability is there and impressive otherwise. If you're happy with it, fine, but to more discerning eyes, for a product being bolstered for its premium visual capabilities, it's disconcerting that the quality of the lenses seems to be degrading with each iteration, if that is indeed the cause. Point blank.