even though it is a CLEARLY MORE INEFFICIENT METHOD to not have some sort of simple 'cut' functionality for files and folders.
Windows' cut/paste is absolutely not more efficient. Besides the fact that the Mac OS in not Windows, and it's up the to user to learn the OS they're in, and not true to force it to do something it isn't programmed to do, there's this:
Here's every physical step in each OS. Whether it's a mouse or keyboard command. Let's just assume we're moving everything from one folder to another. I've opened the source/target folders in the order that would eliminate having to select the source folder to mark the files you're moving since it was opened second, and would therefore already be the highlighted folder. This also assumes the files and folders are on the same drive or partition.
Moving in Windows:
1) Open your target window of files/folders.
2) Open your source window of files/folders.
3) Control+A to select all files.
4) Control+X to cut.
5) Click on the target folder.
6) Control+V to paste.
Moving in OS X:
1) Open your target window of files/folders.
2) Open your source window of files/folders.
3) Command+A to select all files.
4) Click and hold on any folder or file.
5) Drag to the target folder and release the mouse button.
Hmm. Once less step to do the same thing on the Mac. Seems to work pretty well if you ask me.
If you really want to be picky and separate the last step in OS X as two actions; dragging from one folder to the other and then releasing the button, then it's the same number of steps. Either way, your claim that the Windows method is more efficient is false.