Not getting 5120 x 2160...need help

Hi, I have the LG 34WK95U-W (5Kx2K) display and running it on a 2019 Mac Pro. I can get 3440 x 1440 using the Thunderbolt 3 cable, but why am I not getting 5120 x 2160. Is this not compatible with Mac?


LG says it is. I can't get a straight answer.


Thanks!

Posted on Apr 24, 2022 5:05 PM

Reply
Question marked as Top-ranking reply

Posted on Apr 25, 2022 9:57 AM

Imagine wrote:
...
Ok, so I was able to switch the DisplayPort 1.4 to 1.2, and I'm able to switch it to 5120 x 2160, ...
...

Display Stream compression means the display has to have enough really fast compute-power to do the de-compression. If the display does not have enough, it may limit top resolutions under DisplayPort 1.4. Then, counter-intuitively, DisplayPort 1.2 can give higher resolutions.

10 replies
Question marked as Top-ranking reply

Apr 25, 2022 9:57 AM in response to Imagine

Imagine wrote:
...
Ok, so I was able to switch the DisplayPort 1.4 to 1.2, and I'm able to switch it to 5120 x 2160, ...
...

Display Stream compression means the display has to have enough really fast compute-power to do the de-compression. If the display does not have enough, it may limit top resolutions under DisplayPort 1.4. Then, counter-intuitively, DisplayPort 1.2 can give higher resolutions.

Apr 25, 2022 10:31 AM in response to Imagine

When you select "Scaled" resolutions, your display will run at its MAXIMUM possible native resolution. The display should be excellent, and the text [and ONLY the text] has been scaled up to be readable, with lovely edges without stair-stepping along the diagonals of letters.


The issue is that when you go to look at what resolution it says, It LIES to you. You can no longer use the numbers it is telling you for comparison with other display or other settings.


To get accurate information, IGNORE what is says In Display preferences and use:


 menu >about this Mac > (system report) > Graphics & Displays ...


You will see two different resolutions. The one labeled Resolution is the actual resolution your displays set to without any fiddling around. The one labeled User Interface Looks Like is what resolution you would have to be running to get comparable- looking letters. In other word, not comparable to anything.

Apr 25, 2022 7:15 AM in response to Imagine

Sometimes you need to have a "talk" with the display (using On-Screen display settings) about its settings, which it then reports to the Mac as its capabilities, limiting the resolutions possible.


DisplayPort 1.2 Vs DisplayPort 1.4 (both embedded in ThunderBolt) may be the issue. The latter allows for Display Stream Compression, (DSC) which raises the effective data rate.

Apr 25, 2022 10:02 AM in response to Imagine

Imagine wrote:
...
... except everything is tiny. Is there anyway around that?
...


Yes, that is what SCALED resolutions in the Mac are used for. The display is set for highest resolution, and graphics are displayed at that resolution. Text (and only TEXT) will be doubled in size (or 1.2x or 1.5x, or 1.8x you get the idea). this improves readability, BUT: the reported resolutions under Scaled are all "looks like" resolutions, and are not comparable to ACTUAL resolutions.

Apr 25, 2022 9:44 AM in response to Imagine

Ok, so I was able to switch the DisplayPort 1.4 to 1.2, and I'm able to switch it to 5120 x 2160, except everything is tiny. Is there anyway around that?


Also, when it's set to DisplayPort 1.4, the main setting is 3440 x 1440. When I set it to DisplayPort 1.2, 3440 x 1440 is no longer available. The next resolution is 3360 x 1418. Is 3440 x 1440 better for this size monitor? Thanks!

This thread has been closed by the system or the community team. You may vote for any posts you find helpful, or search the Community for additional answers.

Not getting 5120 x 2160...need help

Welcome to Apple Support Community
A forum where Apple customers help each other with their products. Get started with your Apple Account.