Relinking files seems to be needlessly manual. Am I missing something?

I use an external HDD, and from time to time, I open FCP, and see the all-too-familiar solid screen of broken links. I know that if I forgot to plug in my external HDD before opening FCP, I can usually just plug in the HDD, and within a couple of seconds, all will sort itself out.


However... if I change the name of a folder, or something more... 'data structure' oriented... the wall of broken links appears, and this time I have to "do something".


All I do is click on the Library as the top-most level of the "data tree" (my term... sorry)... and I go to File > Relink Files > Original Media... and all I do is select the drive where I assume the files are... and click Locate All. And... it always finds the files.


I've never used ** Vinci Resolve, Adobe Premiere, or Avid Media Composer. But... do all "Professional Level NLE Systems" have a similar clunky... pseudo-manual process like this for when like paths have an pretty common occurrence such as renaming a file?



Posted on Apr 13, 2023 5:03 AM

Reply
Question marked as Top-ranking reply

Posted on Apr 13, 2023 6:45 AM

In some ways FCP media management is more sophisticated than any other NLE -- provided your media and library are on APFS or Mac OS Extended Journaled (HFS+) volumes. Do not use ExFAT or any other volume type.


If your media and library are on APFS or HFS+ volumes, you can shut down FCP, rename every media file, then move every media file to a different folder on that volume, then launch FCP and it will find all the files without relinking.


When using external media, the only thing inside the library are "symlink" pointers to the media files. If your media and library are on APFS or HFS+ volumes, you can shut down FCP, go inside the library and use Finder to *delete* all symlinks. Upon launching FCP it will transparently rebuild all symlinks and all files will be on line. These are just extreme examples of how well FCP media management works. To my knowledge, no other NLE can do this.


The above is possible because FCP resolves addresses to files by pathname and by inode. Inode is a Unix-type auxiliary lookup system, but it only works within a given volume. If you move files to another volume, then relink is necessary.


For that reason (and for general management purposes) it's best if all media files have a unique name. You don't want cases where multiple Sony video files have the name c0001.mp4. That will work provided you never move a file to a different volume and don't relink them. However it is problematic if the files are moved to another volume.


Before importing files to FCP, one simple way to provide unique filenames is simply to use Finder's rename "format" function. It can take the existing filename and add an incrementing numeric suffix. Having unique filenames avoids ambiguity in post production, plus it enables FCP to relink those files even if they are moved to another drive. There are also some XML scenarios where unique filenames can help.


If all your disk volumes are not APFS or HFS+, your highest priority should be changing that. You will have to carefully back up all that material to another drive before reformatting the current drive. Using ExFAT drives is OK if used strictly as a "data shuttle", in fact many camera cards are ExFAT. However ExFAT should not be used for FCP data or libraries. It does have transactional protection for metadata, and it does not support inode address resolution.


Any system using a media database (Adobe Lightroom, Resolve, Premiere, formerly iTunes, etc) has problems if you rename or move a file. The goal with any such system is organize and query the material by metadata, not by filename. E.g, on FCP use keywords and ratings. If renaming files is necessary, do that BEFORE importing, not afterward.


FCP actually handles media better than most -- provided your volumes are APFS or HFS+. If your filenames are unique, FCP can relink those even if moved to another volume and put in different folders.


If your media filenames are unique and placed only on APFS or HFS+ volumes, you are unlikely to have a problem with missing media or relink. There are some exceptions to this such as externally-generated proxies or externally-transcoded media, but that's not what we're discussing here.

Similar questions

3 replies
Question marked as Top-ranking reply

Apr 13, 2023 6:45 AM in response to Dolmetscher

In some ways FCP media management is more sophisticated than any other NLE -- provided your media and library are on APFS or Mac OS Extended Journaled (HFS+) volumes. Do not use ExFAT or any other volume type.


If your media and library are on APFS or HFS+ volumes, you can shut down FCP, rename every media file, then move every media file to a different folder on that volume, then launch FCP and it will find all the files without relinking.


When using external media, the only thing inside the library are "symlink" pointers to the media files. If your media and library are on APFS or HFS+ volumes, you can shut down FCP, go inside the library and use Finder to *delete* all symlinks. Upon launching FCP it will transparently rebuild all symlinks and all files will be on line. These are just extreme examples of how well FCP media management works. To my knowledge, no other NLE can do this.


The above is possible because FCP resolves addresses to files by pathname and by inode. Inode is a Unix-type auxiliary lookup system, but it only works within a given volume. If you move files to another volume, then relink is necessary.


For that reason (and for general management purposes) it's best if all media files have a unique name. You don't want cases where multiple Sony video files have the name c0001.mp4. That will work provided you never move a file to a different volume and don't relink them. However it is problematic if the files are moved to another volume.


Before importing files to FCP, one simple way to provide unique filenames is simply to use Finder's rename "format" function. It can take the existing filename and add an incrementing numeric suffix. Having unique filenames avoids ambiguity in post production, plus it enables FCP to relink those files even if they are moved to another drive. There are also some XML scenarios where unique filenames can help.


If all your disk volumes are not APFS or HFS+, your highest priority should be changing that. You will have to carefully back up all that material to another drive before reformatting the current drive. Using ExFAT drives is OK if used strictly as a "data shuttle", in fact many camera cards are ExFAT. However ExFAT should not be used for FCP data or libraries. It does have transactional protection for metadata, and it does not support inode address resolution.


Any system using a media database (Adobe Lightroom, Resolve, Premiere, formerly iTunes, etc) has problems if you rename or move a file. The goal with any such system is organize and query the material by metadata, not by filename. E.g, on FCP use keywords and ratings. If renaming files is necessary, do that BEFORE importing, not afterward.


FCP actually handles media better than most -- provided your volumes are APFS or HFS+. If your filenames are unique, FCP can relink those even if moved to another volume and put in different folders.


If your media filenames are unique and placed only on APFS or HFS+ volumes, you are unlikely to have a problem with missing media or relink. There are some exceptions to this such as externally-generated proxies or externally-transcoded media, but that's not what we're discussing here.

Apr 13, 2023 5:42 AM in response to Dolmetscher

As far as I can tell, the application is behaving correctly in this regard.

The library contains a database that points to where each clip is. You said you changed it.

So, if the database says clip A is in /Volumes/MyDrive/Somefolder/A.mov

and all of a sudden that folder no longer exists, the correct behavior is to show you a missing clip.


It is not expected that FCP, on its own, would decide to point to, say, /Volumes/MyDrive/ANOTHERfolder/A.mov


The applications going behing the user's back is in fact something for which Apple has often been criticized for... and at times, justly so.


So FCP "fails to find" the clip, because it moved.

Then you ask it to relink, and say "it is there somewhere in /Volumes/MyDrive". Then FCP dutifully looks for a clip with the same properties, finds it at the new location, and asks you if it is ok to relink.


If you ask me, FCP behaves superbly well in this context.

(Not so when it fails to relink, saying "the original file does not have audio, the new one does" when that is not true - alas we've seen quite a bit of those errors...)

This thread has been closed by the system or the community team. You may vote for any posts you find helpful, or search the Community for additional answers.

Relinking files seems to be needlessly manual. Am I missing something?

Welcome to Apple Support Community
A forum where Apple customers help each other with their products. Get started with your Apple Account.