MacBook Pro 13 Late 2011: Maximum RAM Upgrade = 8GB or 16 Gb, which speed ?

To answer the question :

I note that the processor type is I5.2435 M (not easy to found : OS system information of apple menu should give it, but does not).

Then you look to intel processor characteristics.. on Intel site.

You see the I5.2435 processor can pilot up to 16 Gb !

If you see the ram speed it is done for, you have the choice between 1066 and 1333 Mhz (Apple 's choice)


So you can put 16 Gb (2 X 8) of DDR3 Ram so-dimm of 8 GB each, speed of 1333 Mhz.

Careful : 1,35 and 1,5 Volts DDR3 are both Ok, but NOT the 1,2 volts DDR3 !


Anyway, the memory chipset accept up to 1600 Ghz memory speed : the speed adjustment is automatic.

Impossible to found if he can run up to 1866 - 1867 Mhz. The forums gives antagonists answers about that.


I wonder, if you accelerate the memory up to 1600, if the total efficiency will be higher than using 1333 ram, because the ram cycles will not exactly match the processor cycles..

But i do not know enough to answer that question.


Anyway, my MBP late 2011 is now running faster that my 2015 mac book air, with Samsung 870 EVO 1 Tb SSD upgrade (in place of mechanic 500 GB HD) and 16 Gb of 1333 DDR3 upgrade (in place of 1333 DDR3 4 Gb..)...

I do not recognize him...

It can be on and full operational, including typing password, in less than 20 sec...


You can also upgrade MBP late 2011 to High Sierra manually (first install El Capitan, or it does not work with an error message letting you thing a download error) from the latest OS upgrade proposed by initial OS upgraded threw official procedure.

This is better because it continues to accept the upgrades of Chrome and other programs...

You found the information on Apple site, on OS High Sierra page : see accepted mac models.

On the description page of MBP late 2011, he just indicates OSx Lion, and not the High Sierra upgrade possible.



Earlier Mac models

Posted on Apr 25, 2023 11:34 AM

Reply
Question marked as Top-ranking reply

Posted on Apr 25, 2023 6:50 PM

In addition to what @Grant mentions about the speed, what you did not factor into the equation are the numerous other memory timings which Apple never mentions in any of their documentation and memory vendors only regularly mention just one of those other times. The one timing that most vendors mention is the CL timing. With the faster memory, the CL timing is longer/slower. It is the slower CL timing (and other timings) which is the main reason faster memory will fail unless the system is designed to use those slower timings.


Crucial has always listed faster memory as an option when it is actually compatible with a particular system, however, Crucial never listed anything other than the 1,333MHz RAM for the 2011 laptops.


Just because the CPU is capable of something doesn't mean the Logic Board is designed to take full advantage of it.


Intel Macs have always been very picky about the RAM they use....so picky in fact that I will not purchase RAM based just on technical specifications. I will use the tools on the Crucial or OWC website to identify the exact memory part numbers which are compatible with a specific Mac (I also now do this for non-Apple PCs and motherboards for systems I'm building....memory is not a simple thing these days). If Crucial or OWC offers different speeds for a particular system, then & only then is it safe to consider the faster memory.

Similar questions

3 replies
Question marked as Top-ranking reply

Apr 25, 2023 6:50 PM in response to FrankPl

In addition to what @Grant mentions about the speed, what you did not factor into the equation are the numerous other memory timings which Apple never mentions in any of their documentation and memory vendors only regularly mention just one of those other times. The one timing that most vendors mention is the CL timing. With the faster memory, the CL timing is longer/slower. It is the slower CL timing (and other timings) which is the main reason faster memory will fail unless the system is designed to use those slower timings.


Crucial has always listed faster memory as an option when it is actually compatible with a particular system, however, Crucial never listed anything other than the 1,333MHz RAM for the 2011 laptops.


Just because the CPU is capable of something doesn't mean the Logic Board is designed to take full advantage of it.


Intel Macs have always been very picky about the RAM they use....so picky in fact that I will not purchase RAM based just on technical specifications. I will use the tools on the Crucial or OWC website to identify the exact memory part numbers which are compatible with a specific Mac (I also now do this for non-Apple PCs and motherboards for systems I'm building....memory is not a simple thing these days). If Crucial or OWC offers different speeds for a particular system, then & only then is it safe to consider the faster memory.

Apr 25, 2023 5:24 PM in response to FrankPl

MacBook Pro memory timing is FIXED. If it would run faster, Apple would already be running it faster. if you install memory FASTER than the required 1333, it will seem to work, but crash five times a week. Use the recommended speed RAM.


Apple only recommends what they have tested, and two 8 GB DIMMs were not available while these Macs were current, so Apple recommends only 8GB max. if you buy larger DIMMs, it would be prudent to buy from a vendor who guarantees it will work, such as OWC.


The rest of your post is common knowledge here.

This thread has been closed by the system or the community team. You may vote for any posts you find helpful, or search the Community for additional answers.

MacBook Pro 13 Late 2011: Maximum RAM Upgrade = 8GB or 16 Gb, which speed ?

Welcome to Apple Support Community
A forum where Apple customers help each other with their products. Get started with your Apple Account.