Dave Kitabjian wrote:
"Most importantly: place the second copy BELOW the primary storyline, instead of above."
1) Luis, please indulge a newbie with what might be a stupid question. Are you saying to put an entire copy of the multicam clip below the main storyline, or just blade+option+drag down there on an as needed basis, when I want to mask+split?
If you only need that mask/split in a portion of your timeline, you don't need to have a copy of the whole multicam clip. You can just option-drag that bladed area.
2) Second question: you advised putting the temporary split BELOW the primary storyline, but other people are suggesting putting it ABOVE. I guess it could work either way. But I'm trying to understand the relative advantages. Does the graduated effect work better one way vs. the other?
You could do it either way, but the choice impacts where and what you mask.
I assumed that for the most part you would be working with the "normal" angles, and at times you'd want to show two angles.
If you wanted to, for example, show a different angle as a "PiP" (Picture in Picture, say scaled down and on one corner), then you'd have to put that extra copy above the storyline.
But to show two side by side, you could either:
a) put the extra copy above, and apply a mask to it; or
b) put the extra copy below, and apply a mask to the primary
I just felt that the latter would look "cleaner". But as long as one understands it, either is fine.
Also: there is an other option, which is really worthwhile if you use this combined view a lot.
Make a separate project with the two angles combined throughout. Export and reimport.
Then add this combined video as yet another angle to your multicam.
This way, the final project can use a single multicam, and you can cut between the three angles, say A, B, and A/B
(On reflection, I think this is what was done in the video you showed.)