QQQQorey wrote:
I read it as "or one external display with up to 6K resolution at 60Hz over Thunderbolt and one external display with up to 4K resolution at 144Hz over HDMI".
Yes, that is also a supported configuration.
I think according to Apple's website, I can plug an additional "6K resolution at 60Hz" monitor over Thunderbolt.
Up to 6K over USB-C (Thunderbolt).
Up to 4K over USB-C (DisplayPort) - although the Technical Specifications don't usually spell that out.
For a 4K monitor attached via USB-C (DisplayPort), the "up to 5K" or "up to 6K" resolution may still be relevant in terms of what Retina scaling modes are offered. Retina "like 2560x1440" corresponds to a 5K internal canvas. A M3 MacBook Air owner discovered that for their second ("lid closed", "up to 5K") 4K monitor, the Mac didn't offer options between Retina "like 2560x1440" and native 3840x2160. (Retina "like 2560x1440" implies a 5K drawing canvas – and the "missing" modes would have implied 6K ones.)
I'm just not sure if I can swap this "6K resolution at 60Hz" monitor to a monitor that is 4k resolution at 120hz, would the Thunderbolt run it?
No guarantees.
Technically, 6K resolution at 60hz requires more bandwidth than 4K resolution at 120hz, but I just want to make sure it can 100% run before I drop the money on it.
An Apple 5K or 6K monitor would connect via USB-C (Thunderbolt).
Most 4K monitors would attach via USB-C (DIsplayPort). My understanding is that this offers half as many data pathways. If 4K @ 60 Hz requires close to the capacity of a USB-C (DisplayPort) link, my intuition would be that 4K @ 120 Hz over a USB-C (DisplayPort) link isn't going to fly.