Hello PRP_53
I appreciate that your knowledge is far greater than my own in the world of iMac. I was not aware of Etrecheck as being something that Community would require.
I thought that Apple automatically were aware of this and used it to improve OS.
When I bought this second iMac as a 70 year old, I was unaware of a Fusion Drive as being something that clearly is not like my older iMac's contents.
I just wanted a more up to date iMac. When I came to upgrade the RAM memory, I also discovered that this iMac cannot have an upgrade as I expected. On iMac one I had been able to buy new RAM and install it. This was not the case with the second iMac. I felt cheated by Apple.
With Sonoma performing poorly and experiencing the frustrations created by it, I became aware of Sequoia also doing similar things. I had previously had lots of Apple Support and felt that this was another round with the iMac!
If you are aware of the problems I have from my Etrecheck Report, I would be very pleased to hear from you with some possible solutions.
As an investigative sort of old guy, I did find that the queue of backups was an issue with the Sonoma experience, and once they were deleted, then the iMac became much more effective at running my Microsoft 365 software etcetera.
I see that my backup was not done in the report and have now allowed the iMac to update. Previously I had made a point of going to each piece of out of date software and updating where possible. It seems that this could once again be an issue.
I think you can feel my disappointment with this iMac. Such a shame that Steve died and Apple sometimes feels unled!
Best regards,
Jonah