Time Machine backups slower in Sonoma than Monterey

Time Machine backups take much longer with Sonoma than Monterey


I have written an AppleScript routine to log how long Time Machine takes for a backup. There's a second routine that shuts down when the backup completes.


With Monterey, a backup could be seconds if nothing had changed up to a maximum of about 5 hours, with an average of 2 to 3 hours.


With Sonoma, there are always 10s of thousands of changes, and it can take a minimum of 8 hours. If I leave it a day or two, it can be 10 or 12 hours. The first after the upgrade was 16 hours. I have only once left it to do a second backup immediately after the first, and that was also 8 hours.


I backup to a RAID 1 array, and the Mac is the RAID controller. The drive has a Lightning connector, and there's an adapter to the Mac. The backups go back 4 years to August 2022. Disk info states: 2,696,824,111,104 bytes (2.7 TB on disk)


I've used First Aid from Disk Utility on the base drive, and that took about 12 hours or so. It did find an issue, but the second time I ran it, it was fine. It hasn't changed the backup times.


I would like to know why Sonoma takes so much longer to backup than Monterey, and whether Sequoia is likely to be the same, better, or worse? Usage is about the same, I haven't taken on a 'big' project with a load of new files and changes.


I would also like to know if 12 hours plus for First Aid on a RAID 1 array with 2.7 TB is about right?


The drives are Seagate Barracuda, 5400 RPM 256 MB Cache. So they are good, but not NAS grade. I'm seriously thinking about an upgrade for the drives if they are going to be hammered for 8 hours each day just to do a backup!

MacBook Pro 16″, macOS 14.8

Posted on Aug 3, 2026 6:08 AM

Reply
Question marked as Top-ranking reply

Posted on Aug 4, 2026 7:47 AM

The behavior you're seeing is not something we'd generally expect after upgrading from Monterey to Sonoma, but there are several factors that could contribute to the increased backup times.


  • One of the most significant changes introduced in recent versions of macOS is the evolution of the APFS file system and Time Machine (TM) itself. Sonoma performs more extensive tracking of file system metadata, snapshots, and extended attributes than earlier versions. In some environments, this can result in Time Machine detecting substantially more changed items than were reported under Monterey, even when relatively little user data has actually changed.
  • Another consideration is the age and size of the backup history. With approximately 2.7 TB of backup data spanning four years, TM has a very large backup database to maintain.
  • Your storage hardware may also be contributing to the issue. Although the Seagate drives are perfectly suitable desktop drives, they are 5400 RPM disks, which offer relatively modest random I/O performance. TM performs a tremendous amount of small file and metadata operations rather than large sequential writes, so rotational latency becomes a significant bottleneck. Also, how the drive enclosure is connected to your Mac can be a limiting factor.


Regarding Disk Utility First Aid, a runtime of approximately 12 hours on a mirrored 2.7 TB volume made up of 5400 RPM drives is not necessarily abnormal. Since the second run completed without reporting additional issues, it suggests the file system itself is likely healthy.


As for whether upgrading to Sequoia would improve the situation, AFAIK, there isn't any evidence that Sequoia significantly changes TM performance in either direction. Here, at the ASC, some users report marginal improvements, while others see similar behavior to Sonoma. Based on your description, I would not expect Sequoia alone to reduce backup times from 8–12 hours back to the few hours you experienced with Monterey.


With all that said, here are some troubleshooting steps that may help:

  • Verify the RAID volume's SMART health (if your enclosure exposes SMART data).
  • Allow Spotlight indexing to fully complete after the OS upgrade.
  • Check whether antivirus, cloud sync utilities, or other background applications are modifying large numbers of files. If your Mac is using a third-party AV app, disable, or better still, completely remove it.
  • Review the TM logs to determine whether it's spending most of its time scanning, preparing, or copying files.
  • If you're considering a hardware upgrade, replacing the 5400 RPM drives with SSDs (or at least 7200 RPM NAS-class drives) would likely provide a much more noticeable improvement than upgrading from Sonoma to Sequoia.
16 replies

Time Machine backups slower in Sonoma than Monterey

Welcome to Apple Support Community
A forum where Apple customers help each other with their products. Get started with your Apple Account.