jthj wrote:
What I think is odd about it is that if I don't need to duplicate the version for edits made before I edit in a plugin but do need to if I make adjustments after a plugin edit and want to go to another plugin or external editor. I think it's a quirk of Aperture and not Nik as the same thing happens with PT Lens.
It is how Aperture works. I wasn't singling out NIK for handling the files differently -- I was trying to point out that their description of the file handling makes no sense (or is wrong).
As for the first part above:
Aperture is rigorously non-destructive. In order to have a file to send to a plug-in, and to _not_ alter the Original, it _must_ create a new file when you first send an Image to a plug-in. (On this forum that file has been called a "quasi-Original" in order to distinguish it from the, er, other Original.) That much -- the automatic creation of a new quasi-Original from the Image selected for editing with a plug-in -- makes sense to me.
The next issue for the designers is what to do when the user wants to _return_ to a plug-in to continue editing using a plug-in. They can either:
- create _another_ quasi-Original, and send that to the external editor, or
- use the existing quasi-Original, and send it to the external editor.
Each of these makes sense to me. I prefer the option they did not choose -- that each time you send an Image to a plug-in, a new quasi-Original is made -- but note that the one they did choose leaves you the choice to duplicate the Version and have Aperture make that additional quasi-Original. Had they made the other choice, it would have been difficult to return the first quasi-Original to the plug-in for editing.