You can make a difference in the Apple Support Community!

When you sign up with your Apple Account, you can provide valuable feedback to other community members by upvoting helpful replies and User Tips.

Looks like no one’s replied in a while. To start the conversation again, simply ask a new question.

new macbook pro 2011 weak and dropping wireless connection

Just looked throught this part of the forum and found out there are a lot of people out there which seem to have the same problem as me.

I purchased a new modell 2011 MBP on the very first day from our apple store.
At home, sitting directly beside the wireless router I didn´t noticed anything wrong.
I have got beside of the Mac OS a bootcamp Prt. with Windows 7 on it and everythign works fine so far.

Five days after purchased I started traveling on business and at present we are for some weeks in Melbourne. Were having a wireless connection in our appartement and here I have got massiv problems with my connection.

We are having altogether four windows mashines with us, my IPad, my Iphone, another HTC smartphone, and my new Macbook.

All the other devices connecting to our room wireless without problems. The net strengh is not fantastic but the other devices bringing it up to four bars on the windows wireless symbol in the task bar. None of the other computers where ever loosing the connection.

Only my macbook can not make it over three bars and its going on and off. Donwloads fail freuquently because the conection is interrupted more than one times..
In my opinion this problem is even worse on the Windows OS and a bit better but far away from beeing good and acpetable on the Mac Os.
I hope its only a driver issue and there is no hardware problem with the new mashine. Other than this I love the new notebook and I am very satisfied with its performance.

Iphone 4, Ipad 1 ,Macbook pro 13, I 5, 8GB, early 2011, Windows 7, Mac OS

Posted on Mar 8, 2011 9:00 PM

Reply
968 replies

Mar 24, 2011 3:12 PM in response to toabi

Yeah, my ping times were all over the planet, too. The Genius (actually was one, I think) verified it easily, getting results like:

PING 192.168.1.1 (192.168.1.1): 56 data bytes
64 bytes from 192.168.1.1: icmp_seq=0 ttl=64 time=3.383 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.1.1: icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=3.727 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.1.1: icmp_seq=2 ttl=64 time=3.354 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.1.1: icmp_seq=3 ttl=64 time=3.460 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.1.1: icmp_seq=4 ttl=64 time=135.359 ms
Request timeout for icmp_seq 5
Request timeout for icmp_seq 6
64 bytes from 192.168.1.1: icmp_seq=5 ttl=64 time=2223.518 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.1.1: icmp_seq=6 ttl=64 time=2680.255 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.1.1: icmp_seq=7 ttl=64 time=1715.300 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.1.1: icmp_seq=8 ttl=64 time=765.192 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.1.1: icmp_seq=9 ttl=64 time=485.578 ms

using the network utility.

Then plugged in the wired ethernet port and pinged the same router, and got consistent 3.4ms times. Definitely something going on with the wireless card. They are replacing my machine, and it is at the Apple store so should be able to see if the trouble went away this weekend when I have had a chance to pick it up and migrate (again) to it...

Mar 24, 2011 3:23 PM in response to LaraJones

PING 192.168.1.254 (192.168.1.254): 56 data bytes
64 bytes from 192.168.1.254: icmp_seq=0 ttl=64 time=140.118 ms
Request timeout for icmp_seq 1
64 bytes from 192.168.1.254: icmp_seq=2 ttl=64 time=55.322 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.1.254: icmp_seq=3 ttl=64 time=1.118 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.1.254: icmp_seq=4 ttl=64 time=138.421 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.1.254: icmp_seq=5 ttl=64 time=126.810 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.1.254: icmp_seq=6 ttl=64 time=48.469 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.1.254: icmp_seq=7 ttl=64 time=140.133 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.1.254: icmp_seq=8 ttl=64 time=137.847 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.1.254: icmp_seq=9 ttl=64 time=119.606 ms
Request timeout for icmp_seq 10
64 bytes from 192.168.1.254: icmp_seq=11 ttl=64 time=140.082 ms

Mar 24, 2011 3:37 PM in response to wantafanta

Looks familiar, wantafanta. Do you have the capability to try it with a wired connection to the same router?

This behavior reduces my network throughput by a factor of 5. My 2009 macbook pro gets about 25 mbps on my FIOS network connection, but my 'new' 2011 got 5mbps or less. Will report back when I am able to test my new system this weekend, but looks like a systemic problem with the new machines (sigh).

Mar 25, 2011 12:35 AM in response to LaraJones

Same router as above, over ethernet cable. I think I'm going to take it in for a refund on saturday, and get another at a later date.

PPING 192.168.1.254 (192.168.1.254): 56 data bytes
64 bytes from 192.168.1.254: icmp_seq=0 ttl=64 time=0.799 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.1.254: icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=0.664 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.1.254: icmp_seq=2 ttl=64 time=0.509 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.1.254: icmp_seq=3 ttl=64 time=0.689 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.1.254: icmp_seq=4 ttl=64 time=0.565 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.1.254: icmp_seq=5 ttl=64 time=0.657 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.1.254: icmp_seq=6 ttl=64 time=0.548 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.1.254: icmp_seq=7 ttl=64 time=0.503 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.1.254: icmp_seq=8 ttl=64 time=0.485 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.1.254: icmp_seq=9 ttl=64 time=0.775 ms

Mar 25, 2011 6:38 AM in response to wonslung

I replaced my about a week or so ago and the issue is the same, the thing is I replaced at the same store I bought about 10 days later, so could be from the same batch..... I dont know if replacing again would do the trick.

@wonslung when you are saying working fine, did you try the ping times ? Did you try transfering larger files ?

Which Band are you on A/B/G/N ? 2.4 or 5GHz ? What speed are you connected on ?

Message was edited by: yozhbk

Mar 25, 2011 7:43 AM in response to yozhbk

I'm connecting as n but i've also connected as g

I've connected 2.4 and 5ghz

I'm connecting wpa2

my ping times are find, here's an example:


PING 192.168.1.1 (192.168.1.1): 56 data bytes
64 bytes from 192.168.1.1: icmp_seq=0 ttl=64 time=1.587 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.1.1: icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=1.244 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.1.1: icmp_seq=2 ttl=64 time=1.221 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.1.1: icmp_seq=3 ttl=64 time=0.963 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.1.1: icmp_seq=4 ttl=64 time=0.862 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.1.1: icmp_seq=5 ttl=64 time=0.778 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.1.1: icmp_seq=6 ttl=64 time=0.699 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.1.1: icmp_seq=7 ttl=64 time=1.557 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.1.1: icmp_seq=8 ttl=64 time=4.455 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.1.1: icmp_seq=9 ttl=64 time=2.651 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.1.1: icmp_seq=10 ttl=64 time=1.059 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.1.1: icmp_seq=11 ttl=64 time=0.955 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.1.1: icmp_seq=12 ttl=64 time=0.859 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.1.1: icmp_seq=13 ttl=64 time=0.716 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.1.1: icmp_seq=14 ttl=64 time=0.636 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.1.1: icmp_seq=15 ttl=64 time=1.620 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.1.1: icmp_seq=16 ttl=64 time=1.195 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.1.1: icmp_seq=17 ttl=64 time=1.144 ms


Large transfers seem fine.

Message was edited by: wonslung

Mar 25, 2011 2:52 PM in response to Btotheoomer

So is this an issue which is affecting specific types of routers? I have no problem with my old g router, and i recently bought an airport extreme base station which works fine for me as well in 2.4 Ghz n and 5 Ghz n

I'd wonder if this is a really small issue...also, what locale are people in? I know that different locales use different "channels"

I'm in the US.

Mar 26, 2011 12:53 AM in response to TomB01

Spare a thought for this mac newbie who thought he was entering the 21st century with the purchase of a shiny new macbook pro!! Two days have been spent trying to achieve the impossible - simply networking a machine! Something my PCs have been doing seamlessly for years.

Hold out for a fix if you wish. I'm off to my Apple retailer for a refund!

new macbook pro 2011 weak and dropping wireless connection

Welcome to Apple Support Community
A forum where Apple customers help each other with their products. Get started with your Apple Account.