Looks like no one’s replied in a while. To start the conversation again, simply ask a new question.

New Format Sucks!

What the H E double hockey sticks have they done to the format of this forum? It ***** big time. It is neither as intuitive or informative as the old one. I guess I will go elsewhere until they undo this abomination of a format.

Posted on Apr 17, 2011 7:04 PM

Reply
154 replies

Apr 19, 2011 10:15 AM in response to Sekoya

Sekoya wrote:


Topher Kessler wrote:


but despite this there are options to help out, including homepage widgets and email notifications that I've found to be quite useful.

I wonder why Apple simply did not create an actually useful default homepage. Then people would just use that and not complain about how cumbersome it is to sort through all the options (and trying to understand them).


I guess not much more can be said about that. I look at the homepage and see usefulness and function, and your first sentence is the exact opposite viewpoint. I guess it's an impasse...

Apr 19, 2011 10:23 AM in response to Topher Kessler

Topher Kessler wrote:

I guess not much more can be said about that. I look at the homepage and see usefulness and function, and your first sentence is the exact opposite viewpoint.

What exactly is useful about a torrent of posts from all forums combined? What is useful about seeing only your five recent posts without having to go into the personalise section and increase that number? What is useful about seeing the five newest members?

Apr 19, 2011 10:26 AM in response to Sekoya

I guess we're not agreeing on the specifics of what is counterintuitive. In any system the more you get into the settings and feature details the more potential it is for things to be counterintuitive or to have a feature not be what you expected. The main discussion paradigm here is quite intuitive, but i do agree that if you look at some of the features they're not as intuitive as they could be, though that depends on your uses.


At first "Your Stuff" did seem like it should contain all threads with my participation instead of just those I created. Now I just reserve it for looking up questions I've asked, and it works quite well as a resource for that. The use of "Your" in both of the names might be confusing, but you can edit the "Your Content" widget to call it something you think is more appropriate.


I dont think everything needs to be 100% self-explanatory (not everything is) in order to have useful function.

Apr 19, 2011 10:28 AM in response to Topher Kessler

Topher Kessler wrote:


Saxman wrote: ...(above)...


1. Apple provides PLENTY of support. In fact, Apple's support and customer satisfaction is one of the highest rated of all PC manufacturers. You walk into an Apple store and you have folks right there helping you troubleshoot. In addition to Apple's provided support, they host these discussion forums. That's a heaping load of support.


2. You missed my point. The major challenge is revamping a forum to a larger and much different product, while keeping the same "discussion" idea going and not losing user data (posts, accounts, etc.). If you've ever been involved with a project like that you'd understand the complexity involved, and be less prone to assumption.


3. Again you missed my point. As with any new software you'll have kinks (that you don't know ahead of time). I dont think I should have to explain any details of that. The software works quite well from what I've seen, even though some features are in need of attention, but to expect otherwise is to expect too much perfection.


Frankly one could argue perfection about any product or service to counter the option for change...Heck one of the most fuel efficient cars was the VW Beetle, or the Honda S600, so why do we need to "change" to get all these new hybrid vehicles with all the electronic gizmos and bells and whistles? One could argue that's a silly waste of time and resources when we can all buy old Honda S600s and get ~60MPG.

1. Topher, yes of course, just go to an Apple Store, and there's people with answers, great, just what I want to do every time I bump against an issue while in the middle of a project. And please, man, the topic of this is the Discussion Site, not whether you can go to an Apple Store for support! And you've obviously missed my point, since I am comparing Apple to Apple, not how they compare vs PC companies, that's WHY I buy Macs, that's a no-brainer, and completely irrelevant to this conversation. As for them hosting this site, it would be nice if some actual Apple employees actually did HOST this site, by being around; thus avoiding the hundreds of posts I've read where everyone is wondering A) if Apple is aware of certain specific bugs, B) If they're working on a fix, & C) If so, when that might be completed. Instead they've simply put up a place where you have to hope whatever responses you get are from others who know what they are doing. And like I said, too often there's impatience & scolding greeting those needing answers, as well as being told "it's all in your head"....


Apple's Help menu used to provide a very comprehensive, fundamental knowledge base, I remember being able to go line by line in setting all the preferences of Apple's programs, until now, when it's far too sparse, & at times I've not even been able to find an explanation in all of their on-site knowledge base.


2. I guess it must be nice to know that whenever you face disagreement it's because the other person "misses the point", I've not yet reached that level of perfection. But I beg to differ here, what point of yours did I "miss", Topher. To disagree is NOT the same thing as "missing" something. I disagree with your point, can you not see that? You assume I know nothing about "new software", & only "expect perfection", etc, which are just a couple of points you are "missing". And it is exactly this kind of dialog which broadcasts arrogance, as well as "apologizing for Apple", since the only explanation is I must be missing the point, or I'd see clearly that Apple faced a tough, really tough task, and while it's flawed and needs many adjustments, they've done the absolute best, & I should just sit down and shut up....


3. Again with the "perfection" I must be foolishly expecting. Look man, expecting an upgrade or overhauled site to be AT LEAST as good & functional as it was before messing with it, & to be able to see WHY they chose to change it , is hardly "expecting perfection". It is also not being overly demanding that it be at least as functional, if not more, than the older program!

As to your car analogy, it falls apart when you compare it to changing models by introducing gas-guzzling SUVs & shoddily made cars with lots of bells & whistles, more is not always better. I don't need my cellphone to do everything my iMac does for it to make & receive phone calls, and if that capability is lessened & made more complicated, then adding all the other stuff is not "progress"...

Apr 19, 2011 10:39 AM in response to Topher Kessler

Topher Kessler wrote:


In any system the more you get into the settings and feature details the more potential it is for things to be counterintuitive or to have a feature not be what you expected.


At first "Your Stuff" did seem like it should contain all threads with my participation instead of just those I created. Now I just reserve it for looking up questions I've asked, and it works quite well as a resource for that. The use of "Your" in both of the names might be confusing, but you can edit the "Your Content" widget to call it something you think is more appropriate.

The funny thing is that I cannot really remember to have gone into the settings with the old system. Just the fact that I have to go into the settings to get basic functionality working cannot exactly be described as being the hallmark of an intuitive system.

Apr 19, 2011 10:39 AM in response to Topher Kessler

Topher Kessler wrote:


I guess we're not agreeing on the specifics of what is counterintuitive. In any system the more you get into the settings and feature details the more potential it is for things to be counterintuitive or to have a feature not be what you expected. The main discussion paradigm here is quite intuitive, but i do agree that if you look at some of the features they're not as intuitive as they could be, though that depends on your uses.



I dont think everything needs to be 100% self-explanatory (not everything is) in order to have useful function.

That it's not close to "100% self-explanatory" means that it is also NOT "intuitive", or else you need to look the word up. It's odd than one who's "not apologizing for Apple" answers every single critique of the site, as well as is fighting a losing battle, attempting to tell lots of people who find this site not very intuitive, that they are wrong. I'm a musician, it would be the height of folly for me to try and convince people who don't like listening to a certain artist, they are "wrong"! "Intuitiveness", like music, is in the eyes (or ears) of the beholder, you can't tell people what they are seeing or hearing is wrong, simply because YOU don't see or hear it the same way. You are only digging the hole you're in, deeper & deeper, as it implies, of course, that you know better than everyone else...

Apr 19, 2011 10:45 AM in response to Saxman

I really think its sad that people are being so negative towards this change. I am a new user and while the site is definitely not perfect, it has really come up to par with the rest of Apple's sites. I am keeping an open mind to the changes and do agree with alot of what has been said so far. I'm confident that Apple will be improving the site.


Having been an Apple user for quite some time now, I know it is a company that most certainly listens to what the customers are saying. But as developing any product, it takes time to hone and improve it. I have seen the hosts in here answering questions and they are clearly collecting our feedback.


Anyway, still keeping an open mind here. I think the fact that Apple has a site like this shows that they care about their customers. Thats reassuring to me.

Apr 19, 2011 10:50 AM in response to Saxman

Saxman wrote:


That it's not close to "100% self-explanatory" means that it is also NOT "intuitive", or else you need to look the word up. It's odd than one who's "not apologizing for Apple" answers every single critique of the site, as well as is fighting a losing battle...


I guess we'll just have to disagree on that point. Intuitiveness is graded, and not a black and white issue.


Again, its obvious we're disagreeing; however, I have just as much say about my opinion as you do about yours. I never said I know better than anyone else, so stop putting words in my mouth. I mentioned early on that it appears people are resistant to change, and since then I've been discussing details (and disagreeing with some--including some that folks see as fundamental to the site) on the features here.


I don't see myself in any hole here, and have not at all seen this as a "battle" of sorts. It's kind of odd to me that you do...perhaps you should stop fighting and participate in a discussion here.

Apr 19, 2011 11:32 AM in response to Topher Kessler

Topher Kessler wrote:


What "like" feature? There's the little thumbs-up button at the bottom of each posting already, if that's what you mean.

I read in another thread that this "thumbs up" = "like" will be implemented at some point to show the most popular posters in all windows (the more likes = the more popular). That is what I was referring to; right now, indicating that I liked your post does nothing (except to show that I liked it). If it does result in names being splashed somewhere showing that so-and-so is "popular", I will re-visit my decision to participate. I don't need or want a Facebook like atmosphere in a tech forum.


At first "Your Stuff" did seem like it should contain all threads with my participation instead of just those I created. Now I just reserve it for looking up questions I've asked, and it works quite well as a resource for that.


Well, I rarely ask a technical question - I come here to answer technical questions. And "your stuff" does not work to find new content/posts in threads I've posted to. The only reason I'm participating in these non-technical areas is because we are trying to figure out how to best make use of the new system. Other than that, there are few "discussions"; tech forums are for questions and answers.

Apr 19, 2011 11:39 AM in response to babowa

Havent they already had similar things with the rating system? The old forums each had a "Top Posters" (or something like that) list of all the folks with the most points.


I agree that ultimately this wouldn't be much of a help to anyone, and it would be nice to have the option to remove it. However, even if it isnt removable my guess is it will be easy to just ignore it.

New Format Sucks!

Welcome to Apple Support Community
A forum where Apple customers help each other with their products. Get started with your Apple ID.