Richardsonic wrote:
Jeff - It seems disingenuous to say someone had to buy FCPX to find out that it didn't support EDL, OMF and all of the other things causing the collective indigestion here. I had an email from Creative Cow by 10am the morning of the release with a review that talked about all of the missing features. There was endless righteous indignation on these forums almost immediately. Even the nitwit David Pogue pointed out these things in the New York Times. Of course people would have had to wait a whole day after the release to find that out from him.
Regardless, I understand everyone's disappointment regarding the bigger picture. I'm just suggesting that we take some responsibility for our own (perhaps rash) purchasing decisions and get over the "Give us our money back!!!" cry-baby routine. Frankly, I'd be embarrassed to admit publicly that I had made such a foolish decision.
I take it that you're a lone-gun.
We have many software products in our workflow .. and our pattern has been fairly consistent ...
get the new version .. assign somebody to evaluate it .. determine whether it will work (or
not). Sometimes we decide to delay deployment. In the case of FCPX, we determined that the
timeline of the the product meeting our workflow requirements was longer than our event-horizon.
We're not going to rely on Creative Cow or any other forum to make that determination for us.
We will read blogs, but the accuracy of information is not what we would base decisions upon.
If there's a trial version, then we get those. In the case of FCPX, they do not provide trials.
So, we bought the program with the expectation that we would be refunded if it did not meet
our needs. That is still our expectation, even if the Mac Store is being a little dysfunctional.
Based on *our* evaluation, we decided to re-tool to another platform. If somebody told me that
they made a "go-no-go" decision based on Creative Cow, that would be a problem.
I don't think it's belly-aching to ask for a refund. The product did not function in a way that
we could use it.
Frankly, with this degree of change, Apple should have provided a "trial" path and perhaps they
will consider doing so in the future.
jeff