Apple Event: May 7th at 7 am PT

Looks like no one’s replied in a while. To start the conversation again, simply ask a new question.

Bring back old working Spaces and Expose

Mission Control is a complete misfire and several steps backwards in design and usability. They took something that was beautifully simple and nearly flawless and turned it into a chaotic mess for no reason.


I was a heavy user of Spaces and Expose and it was easily my favorite OS X feature hands down. Now it's been three days of Lion and I just avoid Mission Control at all costs and find myself switching apps instead, something I would expect from Microsoft, not Apple.


Trying to understand how to use MC without going insane I started simply swithing apps instead of thinking about spaces, and at least that made some sense, but there was still a lot of unnecessary changing of spaces back and forth for no reason. It dawned on me to try something: I killed all Spaces and have a single desktop with every window. You know, like Windows would do. As a testament of what a terrible idea MC is, it works a lot better this way. When you do Expose you can at least understand what you're looking at, and you don't care that the tiny Space thumbnail is being covered up by your windows. There's also no unnecessary shuffling between spaces. It's an obviously cluttered, primitive, step back in sophistication and usability that almost makes me wish I had Vista's Flip 3D, but at least I am not spending half of my time jumping between spaces and hunting down lost windows.


Here's some of the issues with Mission Control:


- It's visually confusing and messy. The application windows usually cover the Spaces thumbnails along the top. What is the point of showing me the Spaces if they're covered up with windows? Isn't that defeating the very point of Mission Control? Why do I need to see my desktop background inset within *another* background in MC? Why are the Windows stacked so tightly and messily? It's impossible to pick the window you want unless you do "App Expose". What is the point of having Spaces previews if they're so tiny you can barely see what it's in them anyway? They used to be nice, clean, large previews. Now it's a stupid mess of tiny thumbnails with drop shadows, text labels, multiple backgrounds, being covered by app windows... ugh.


- The fact that they are now a linear row of spaces along the top is clearly much less user friendly than the old grid method, which was spatially and visualy easy to use and memorize. Now I have to think about numbers for desktops instead of "up" or "down". You know how much easier it is to type numbers on a keypad versus pecking the linear numbers along the top of your keyboard? Same thing. Also, you could go into the old Spaces and accurately hit the Space you want to go to because they were huge, easy to read and remember targets. Now they're tiny, hard to remember and usually hidden under something else.


- It took the advantages of both Spaces and Expose and eliminated them in order to merge them, who knows why. You used to be able to go into Spaces, and then Expose while there to reveal every window, and find *any* open window in seconds. Now it's impossible. You have to shuffle haplessly through spaces and hit expose and hope the window you're looking for shows up, and if that fails, which happens often, then you have to switch to every application and hit app expose. What a mess.


Easy solution: Just bring back the old Spaces and Expose, maybe as an option to MC. Or at least give us the option fo a grid layout and old style Expose. Please. Please. Please.

Mac OS X (10.6.7)

Posted on Jul 23, 2011 12:49 AM

Reply
380 replies

Jul 23, 2011 12:39 PM in response to anilsudhakaran

How can you clearly see all desktops if they're covered up with windows? It's not a matter of opinion - you literally cannot see them.


Beyond that, I think it's disingenuous to say that old Spaces was "totally usable" - that's simply not true. Scores of people at our company use Spaces constantly. It's clearly a simpler UI than Mission Control.

Jul 23, 2011 1:19 PM in response to tmsnnnz

Here we are, everyone is starting to talk about spaces. fine LOVE mission control as much as you wish or whatever. I just want expose back as a stand alone it was before I am not interested in mission control or spaces. You need to understand that a lot of home users are only using internet and a few things at the same time, they only need one desktop and expose stand alone which is very user friendly, why can they not have this a stand alone without going in to mission control. I or no one is saying expose is better. I dont know if you have noticed but when you go on full scrren mode on safari ot goes in to a seperate desktop and it does that for each full screen safari that you open, so if you have 6 pages of safari that means 6 desktop. I also asigned photoshop to desktop 2 but asigned finder to desktop one. I went on desktop one and right clicked on an image open in photoshop BUT guess what althoug photoshop is asigned to desktop 2 but it has opened image in photoshop on desktop one. There are a lot of infringement and bugs. another thing is why in mission cont rol there are so much spaces wasted at the bottom, right and left side with this grey background. I am sorry to say but those who love mission control should use it and try to find bugs to report to apple because I am not using it because I do not need it I only need expose but I cannot have it just now BUT I hope Apple will put expose back as a stand alone app.

regards

Jul 23, 2011 1:23 PM in response to delizaza23

@delizaza23


For item 1. The option is still there but the keyboard combo is different. In the Mission Control system preference, it's under 'Applicaion windows:'. The new combo is ctrl-arrow down. I've returned it to F10 on my old MacBook. Invoking that (or the new key combo) while in Safari will 'Expose' all active windows foe the app. This should apply to all other apps as well.


For item 2. Click and hold (or right click) on the app in the Dock and select 'Show All Windows'


It's still not great.but workable. Personally, I find MC to be a small bag of hurt and dislike the matted photo approach to it's appearance - very amateurish.

Jul 24, 2011 2:11 AM in response to delizaza23

delizaza23 wrote:


I also asigned photoshop to desktop 2 but asigned finder to desktop one. I went on desktop one and right clicked on an image open in photoshop BUT guess what althoug photoshop is asigned to desktop 2 but it has opened image in photoshop on desktop one.

This probably won't happen if there's already a window open in Photoshop.

Jul 24, 2011 7:52 PM in response to delizaza23

delizaza23 wrote:


ok guys please tell me this. You know how you right click an icon and click on show all windows. How do I create a shot cut for this.

If you're referring to right-clicking on a Dock icon, what you are seeing is show "Application windows" part of Mission Control. There is already a keyboard shortcut for that in:


/System Preferences/Keyboard/Keyboard Shortcuts/Mission Control. I've re-assigned it to F10 on my old MacBook.


The extra advantage that using the right-click in the Dock gives you is the ability to view all windows in an active but not in the foreground, application whereas the keyboard shortcut only works for the front most active one.

Jul 26, 2011 6:11 AM in response to tmsnnnz

I have been using mission control to try to get used to it but still have problems. THE BEST SOLUTION APPLE SHOULD DO IS. when in mission control exposing should expose the way it exposed before, I mean lets say you have 10 safari pages open, 4 finder and 7 key note open. when you go in mission control, you go over the the safari and when you swipe it exposes BUT IT DOES NOT SEPERATE THE 10 SAFARI PAGES CLEARLY. so what I am sayin is expose within mission control should seperate the pages clearly as before.

Bring back old working Spaces and Expose

Welcome to Apple Support Community
A forum where Apple customers help each other with their products. Get started with your Apple ID.