"When is everybody going to notice the pattern that occurs with every single line of apple product?
The company is successful because of their talent in forcing users to update their products, often quite prematurely. I am writing this on a macbook pro from 2009 - still brand new to me, but without the newest operating system, I cannot use many of the new features and am slowely becoming outdated to the point where nessasary software and utilites cannot run on my "outof date system".
Can i upgrade? YES. Am i encouraged to update? Indirectly, YES.
Will the new update slow down my machine and make it seem as though my hardware is out of date, thereby forcing me to buy another one? Absolutly.
I have two identical iphone 3g devices infront of me, one of them is running ios3.1.3 and the other is running the latest-supported 4.2.1 NEITHER ARE JAILBROKEN. The "updated" one is SO MUCH SLOWER it is almost unreal, its a real eye opener.
It's not wrong because of the addiction that apple has created for its products, its wrong that some of the cost that we pay for these overpriced items go to the R&D of "planned obsolescence" (how to make the product lifespans shorter)."
____________________________________
In replying to the original post above, i do not think this is a comspiracy of any sort, and like i said previously, i also do not think this is socially wrong in our capitalistic society - where the goal is to make serious profit, however, it should be morally wrong, since the products are expensive, and the last thing in a consumer's head about Apple products is that their device updates are going to be "forced", with no easy way to bring back the original firmware, and that the original firmware becomes out of date quite fast. Might it be true that Apple is always looking for improvements in their software and then releasing them quickly? Absolutly, but the earlier issue of having people update in order to stay current and subsequently impacting their device's performance negatively is still very much relevant.
Explain why my Dad's Wndows XP computer from 2001 is still running and regulary getting updates to the various software and browsers, thereby indirectly keeping it up-to-date and useable? This example is in perfect contrast with the time I tried to sync a new ipod to my old imac, I got a message saying that I need the newest version of iTunes installed. When I tried to install the newest version of iTunes, it told me that I need a newer version of the operating system! What was I to do? I installed Snow Leopard on my previously Tiger machine. If I had a PC, iTunes would not have forced me into that corner, right?
Nothing lasts forever, and you cannot compete with technology. But an argument can be made about being able to enjoy (such expensive) products for a longer period of time than this pattern goes to show, especially when most Apple lovers seem to take such great care of their products, that most have worked very hard for.
I am currently debating whether to update my mid-2009 Leopard Macbook Pro to Snow Leopard or Lion. Obviously Leopard runs great, but the apple store employee that was quick to tell me I wont be able to access all websites very soon has made me take into careful consideration which operating system will perform best on my machine, and which one will keep me up to date, for another several months, at most.