(I finally had my retina taken in today after 1 LG replacement & 3 months of IR BS. Here's what happened.)
Alright, finally managed to argue some sense into Apple Eaton and get this exchanged for a Samsung display.
I have a CTO 2.3/16/256 unit, week 1/35, which was delivered through an authorised reseller 08 July, 4 weeks after ordering it. LG screen, no IR until 31 July.
This was right before the test came out, so when I took it in, the Genius looked at it, and said, 'Right, we'll exchange that screen for a new one right away.'
Pointedly, to my question, 'Is this a Samsung screen?' he replied, 'It's a new one.'
Of course, it was another LG display. So I started to see moderate IR by day 6, and took it in on day 14, having already visited a reseller whose technician hadn't yet been certified on the newer retina displays (and thus couldn't take on my warrantied AppleCare repair).
The reseller tech was able to confirm that the stock of display units had formerly been available under two part numbers, 6529 (since confirmed as LG) and 7171 (Samsung), but that now [as it then was mid-September], only the 7171 part was listed. This was confirmed via the inputting of my serial number into the Apple inventory system at the reseller.
Anyway, the Apple Genius at first hadn't encountered a retina IR return before, so he had to read up on the now-changed SOP for dealing with it. He spewed the standard lines that I had to have a test via their URL, and at the end the rMBP didn't have as pronounced an effect as with the previous screen, and so was judged as 'within spec' - Totally and utterly infuriating, given the fact that as Dr Sly points out, the spec is arbitrary and subjective, and worse, it is post-hoc or after the fact as a way for Apple to basically cover its ***. [Did Apple talk about this at all in its advertising? Of course not. But not even in the fine print do they say, 'These displays may be subject to image retention']
And, again, this guy didn't even know what the **** my problem was 5 minutes earlier. How can anyone take this process seriously? I protested, but the Genius would not budge. I asked what would happen if the IR got worse, and he basically weaseled out with a reply that I would have to take the test again. And if it failed? Well, I'd have to consider my options.
When I realised that I could at last resort just return it as unsatisfactory and cancel the credit card charges, I decided that would be the thermonuclear option, and tell them so.
Other things intervened, but the IR on the retina steadily worsened. Two weeks after the test at Eaton Centre, I had a call from a retail manager at Apple Eaton Centre following up from my feedback, which had been pretty critical of the whole experience. I called him back, then his colleague called to follow up on the follow up. After I explained what had happened, he agreed to look into the part numbers and see if they could exchange the screen. And he would call back within the hour.
Then, nothing.
For 11 days.
Finally, I called back, and said, look, I want this resolved, and I want options from you by next week. Exchange the screen, exchange the machine, or refund, but my preference - as yours should be - is to just get the Samsung, and go home.
OK, final result, manager calls back on Tuesday, he's very apologetic, but there's really no way they can specify a part number for the retina. My ears are burning as I listen to this.
Thursday. I have to get back to the manager. OK, go in, maybe you can explain this better in person.
As I'm by the reseller first, I figure I will go back in and ask about the incident (see original post from mid-September for details; search the IR thread for 'northtwilight'), then ask if I can chat with the tech again about the IR on the retina and the supply chain. No luck on the incident itself, unfortunately, but the technician confirms that the situation is unchanged, only one part available.
So when I get to Apple Eaton this older dude resembling Jerry Garcia walks up and gets the manager, who turns out to be a bit younger than I would have expected. Then the two of them get into it. The IR is within spec, they say, and you'll have to take the test again. We can't specify part numbers.
'Oh really? So why is it that other Apple Stores are confirming on your forums that they in fact can do so? Do you have a different distribution chain between here and the US that no one has mentioned before now?'
That's just unconfirmed noise, says Garcia. I'm getting very angry now.
To which I say, here, check out these - and I show them the originals of the photos from Wednesday's German IR test -- and the older guy goes, 'Well, I don't know where that could have come from' -- dude. It's your bloody test. In German.
And this is beautiful, because I really do have them dead to rights now.
You want to make me take the test, this machine will fail it. Here's the proof.
Manager says they can't specify the part number, but as he said, they'd be happy to exchange the whole unit - or refund it. I say, look, I know beyond doubt that there are only Samsung screens in your reserve stock.
Let's confirm it, OK? If what you say is true, and I am wrong, you can prove it.
The 6529 is the LG <types into the iPhone stock controller>
The 7171 is the Samsung.
off they go.
Five minutes later, lo and behold! The 7171 is a Samsung unit after all. You *can* specify part numbers after all. Gee, you've only been lying to me for the last 6 weeks.
So then it's chat with a Genius time to sign for the repair. Christ on a bike.
Apple: How is it that I supposedly know more about your parts chain and distribution than you do? I don't, but your willingness to generate this pointless set of procedures and make your staff go through this disheartening exercise is corroding your credibility with customers who have already forked over a small fortune for what is supposed to be your best product.