Yes it would. Such a brand being the only one that didn't make coffee, would be known to all.
What?
That's the difference between a consumer and IT pro who isn't a manager. A sys admin or engineer will know better. Any technical person who makes decisions based on company (any company) product marketing is engaging in asshatery and should be fired.
Again, you are correct. IT pros should know better. The problem is Apple markets to the consumer that their server product will allow the consumer to do what a sys admin does, without the sys admin (or the cost of said sys admin). Buy saying 'Apple does this all the time and you should know by now', you are being an apologist for Apple. Apple IS doing something wrong in this case. Just because everyone stretches the truth about their product, that doesn't make it right.
If you fall for it, you deserve what you get.
And I didn't fall for it. As I mentioned before, I purchased a MacMini with OS X Server and did my due diligence before I implemented. Apple failed the test. OS X Server never went to production because it is not production ready. It never will be. Now I've just got a nice Mac workstation.
This is in the category of NOT NEWS. Apple has done this forever.
I see, you aren't being an apologist, you are just stating fact... OK, now I get it. </sarcasm>
I think this particular venue makes a discussion on the ethics of business marketing out of scope. If you actually think the product marketing is false advertising and in effect fraud, all the more reason you're better off using other products.
That is why we just spent upwards of $100,000 buying new Dell Servers running VMWare with MS Server 2008, Exchange Server, SQL Server and 100 Windows terminals. Almost half of that was for MS licenses. Money I would happily spend with Apple if they simply had a decent Server Solution. I wasn't looking to Apple to save money. I was looking to Apple to avoid MS. Apple, go ahead and charge me good money for a server OS, just make one worth buying...
>>So you are saying men aren't sentimental? Or was that sarcasm and I just missed it?
Neither.
So, it's just birthdays aren't important to either of you. I see.