You seem to be missing the point that a mapping tool is for those of us going to a place we have never been before. You continue to claim that Google took you to the correct place on this street. Yet I have proved, not claimed, proved, that Google Maps fails completely on this street. My proof is the fact that all addresses resolve to the same place. Anyone can enter the addresses on that street into both Google and Apple maps and see for themselves.
It is important to point out that I am not, nor have I ever claimed that Apple Maps is better than, or even as good as, Google Maps. I have only claimed that Apple Maps is not "useless rubbish" or an "absolute disaster". Apple Maps is a very capable mapping tool that does have some advantages over Google's produce, especially on a handheld device.
The issue here is that some people try to point one one specific data point (and I do mean one) in order to claim that Apple Maps is useless. That isn't just wrong. It is someone engaged in an attempt to deceive. Unfortunately, Google Maps does have some excellent tools for the armchair GIS enthusiast. These tools, such as street numbers and Street View, allow me to completely disprove one of these deceitful claims, even though I have never been on that street. Isn't that what everyone is asking for - for Apple and Google to work together? In this case, they did.
I am not trying to use this one street to prove that Apple Maps is better than Google Maps. I am also not going to claim, without any evidence, that Apple maps is useless in major world cities. I have found that I can compare Google Maps and Apple Maps side by side using Xcode and the iOS simulator. If anyone else is interested in the truth about Apple Maps' coverage on their particular street, you can try it out easily and risk free and see for yourself. And I encourage that.