Glad to help. Apple is on a march toward the eschewing of directory services (OD and AD), as seen by the success of the the iPad which essentially doesn't even have a user account. This is the "power" (or lack there of) of profiles. Profiles are mostly device configuration, not user config. Granted, there is the ability to push e-mail settings but without a regex feature like that in mobile iron, this is incredible time consuming and tedious.
To your comment:
It is true that schema modifications are irreversible and must be taken seriously, but if done carefully with the proper backups, usually it's OK. I mean Exchange, SharePoint and several other Microsoft tools do extend the schema at initial installation and even when migrating from a version to another.
Yes. Anything done "carefully with proper backups" is safe 🙂 But not necessarily wise. Also note that all the other products mentioned are made by Microsoft and the expectation is that products from a like minded company should work together. I've been integrating Macs into AD for more than a decade (yes, I was one of those idiots using the LDAP plugin back in 10.3(?) if memory serves). In all that time I have not yet once found an valid reason for modifying schema, even when Apple was hot on the topic. Also, in that time, I've seen seen more companies invest in Centrify only to let it stagnant as the Windows admins struggle to figure out what to manage on a Mac. Granted, in the old days, this is when Macs were mostly small departments dedicated to content creation. Recently, this trend is shifting to mass deployments of Macs as general use systems. As this continues, we are seeing a renewed interest in "managing" the Macs. If this is a strict requirement, then the only answer at this point is to look into JAMF (Disclaimer: I/we are a reseller and integrator of the Casper Suite so make sure you do your independent research before accepting the advice of a mostly anonymous contributor on a public discussion forum).
And yes, SCCM is promising to support the Macs. But even after a Microsoft briefing, I get the feeling that this is going to be another Altiris "we support Macs" moment which basically translates into "if you can actually find the software and make it work, we will inventory the device for you." In which case, you have nothing of value. Again, I can only make a judgement based on an early briefing. It is possible with the depreciation of MCX, SCCM will be able to implement profile manager (after all, this is a publicly available structure from Apple). If this is the case, then it may be possible to use profiles to manage some of your settings. But once again, the new feature from Apple (profiles) are nowhere near as expansive as MCX was. And sadly, MCX is dead. We can only hope that Apple will expand profile manager's options. But if we are to believe the trend of blending the OS will trend with more input from iOS and less from OS X, then profile manager will never become as rich as MCX because there will be no perceived need.
This also goes along with Apple's push to thin imaging and BYOD. Apple plays well into this space due to limited product options. Companies considering BYOD see the Windows PC market and begin to tremble as the shear volume of configurations and versions. Then they look at Apple and see the same product with different screen sizes and have a sigh of relief.
Now about the GPO - Managed Preferences. Well our organization like to enforce everything from automatic screensaver after a certain amount of time, password to unlock screensaver, disable hardware like USB ports or DVD drives, automatic lauching of applications at startup, background image, default webpage, default desktop theme, tweak application security in several applications, mounting default network shares at startup, blocking the opening of certain software, we have hundreds of them. We do not use computer imaging software, everything is in SCCM and most settings are GPO based, so that no matter what, even an administrator messing with the computer, most settings will be reset at next startup or after a certain delay. It seems like Microsoft support Macs in SCCM 2012 SP1, so I guess our organization will want to centralize everything there too, ideally.
So this next section, I will ask this question: Do you have a mobile device management solution in place? If so, you might want to look at the vendors ability to support OS X. AirWatch is already doing it. Mobile Iron either is or is about to. JAMF started on Mac OS. This may allow you to avoid deploying a "mostly idle" server just for policy enforcement. Plus, if you are cloud hosting this and you are using mostly Apple laptops, then enforcement continues outside the LAN.
There are a lot of things to consider. As you may guess, many of us in the industry are anxious to see where Apple is going in 10.9. We know MCX will be dead which will take OS X out of many schools. We can assume that Profile Manager will once again expand to support more settings. But how much of OS X will end up in iOS 7 and how much of iOS 7 will end up in OS X remains a large unanswered question. I check my dev seed status daily for the answers.
My advice is to do everything you can to discover the benefits and needs of the organization. The AD plugin is free and already on every Mac. JAMF will give you a 30 day demo. Apple Profile Manager is built into Server.app. And it is $30 and can be installed on any Mac. You can clearly investigate these services and solutions will little to no cost.
And, a plug for the Consultants Network community and even Apple Pro Services. You are not alone on this quests. I spend my weeks in fortune 500 companies integrating Macs into their organizations. Reach out to the Consultants in your area (or beyond as some of us travel 🙂) by looking here: http://consultants.apple.com.consultantlocater.com Or reach out to your Apple rep and ask about a Pro Services Readiness Assessment. These are great ways of rapidly advancing the project.