Did my Mac really fail this memory test? (Memtest 4.22)

I recently bought 16 GB memory (at 1600 MHz) for my 15-inch MacBook Pro (late 2011), and ran the Memtest on it.



Apparently, it failed, but take a look for yourself:


mac:~ User$ memtest all 2

Memtest version 4.22 (64-bit)
Copyright (C) 2004 Charles Cazabon
Copyright (C) 2004-2008 Tony Scaminaci (Macintosh port)
Licensed under the GNU General Public License version 2 only


Mac OS X 10.7.5 (11G63) running in multiuser mode
Memory Page Size: 4096
System has 8 Intel core(s) with SSE
Requested memory: 6356MB (6664851456 bytes)
Available memory: 6356MB (6664851456 bytes)
Allocated memory: 6356MB (6664851456 bytes) at local address 0x0000000101000000
Attempting memory lock... locked successfully
Partitioning memory into 2 comparison buffers...
Buffer A: 3178MB (3332425728 bytes) starts at local address 0x0000000101000000
Buffer B: 3178MB (3332425728 bytes) starts at local address 0x00000001c7a0c800


Running 2 test sequences... (CTRL-C to quit)


Test sequence 1 of 2:


Running tests on full 6356MB region...
  Stuck Address       : ok              
  Linear PRN          : ok              
Running comparison tests using 3178MB buffers...
  Random Value        : ok 
  Compare XOR         : ok 
  Compare SUB         : ok 
  Compare MUL         : ok 
  Compare DIV         : ok 
  Compare OR          : ok 
  Compare AND         : ok 
  Sequential Increment: ok 
  Solid Bits          : ok              
  Block Sequential    : testing 181 of 256


FAILURE! Data mismatch at local BUFA address 0x0000000103efe398, BUFB address 0x00000001ca90ab98
BUFA Data: 0xb4b4b4b4b4b4b4b4, BUFB Data: 0xb4b4b4b4b6b4b4b4


  Checkerboard        : ok              
  Bit Spread          : ok                
  Bit Flip            : ok                
  Walking Ones        : ok                
  Walking Zeroes      : ok                


Test sequence 2 of 2:


Running tests on full 6356MB region...
  Stuck Address       : ok              
  Linear PRN          : ok              
Running comparison tests using 3178MB buffers...
  Random Value        : ok 
  Compare XOR         : ok 
  Compare SUB         : ok 
  Compare MUL         : ok 
  Compare DIV         : ok 
  Compare OR          : ok 
  Compare AND         : ok 
  Sequential Increment: ok 
  Solid Bits          : ok              
  Block Sequential    : ok                 
  Checkerboard        : ok              
  Bit Spread          : ok                
  Bit Flip            : ok                
  Walking Ones        : ok                
  Walking Zeroes      : testing  20 of 128


FAILURE! Data mismatch at local BUFA address 0x000000016ad74688, BUFB address 0x0000000231780e88
BUFA Data: 0x0000000000080000, BUFB Data: 0x0000000000080008 

*** Memory Test Failed ***  Please check transcript for details.
Execution time: 3189 seconds.


Should I return the memory?


I ran this Terminal command with a few other programs open.

MacBook Pro, Mac OS X (10.7.5)

Posted on Mar 21, 2013 8:41 AM

Reply
27 replies

Mar 21, 2013 10:21 AM in response to Bimmer 7 Series

Yeah, I have an SSD too 🙂


4GB is way too little, and using these 16GB modules now, I have a lot of free space usually — but when I'm hard at work, then that's no longer the case.


So 8GB might not be enough. But on the other hand, I've been kind of coping with 4GB... it *****, but it's fine.


In any case, I don't want to have any compatibility issues and have to return memory again.


Do you think the 16GB from Corsair or even Komputerbay (their Mac version, $10 more expensive!) be fine?

Mar 21, 2013 10:32 AM in response to Rudolfensis

I have nothing against Corsair - Just had a few of their Mac specific RAM that didn't work in my Macbook - I use Crucial, Patriot Mac Series and Mushkin as my preference.


I think you're fine with 8GB - I'm using my 2012 Macbook Air right now with 4GB and look how many apps I have running in the background and still have almost 1GB of free memory left. So I think, again, my opinion only, you'll be fine with 8GB. But 16GB is even better - for bragging rights.


User uploaded file

Mar 21, 2013 10:37 AM in response to Rudolfensis

There are many instances where Apple has released a MBP model where initially the maximum RAM that can be supported has changed after the release. This is usually attributable due to the fact that lager capacity RAM chips were either not available or were not thoroughly tested at the time on order to be considered sufficiently reliable.


In regards to the frequency issue, what Intel says a CPU may be capable of versus how Apple engineers design a given MBP using an Intel RAM chip are not necessarily identical. One must ask why OWC and Crucial sell RAM for Macs for your model with 1333 MHz and do not offer the faster 1600 MHz chips? Any RAM engineer will tell you that the faster the RAM speed, the less stable and less reliable the RAM will be. 'About t5his


As an experimemt, I installed faster RAM from my 2011 MBP into my 2010 MBP and the 2010 MBP did work. However the 'About this Mac' showed that the RAM was 1067 MHZ, not 1333 MHz. I know what your display showed and you are not the first one to experience those results. The question is, is the RAM performing at 1600 MHz or at 1333 MHz and that the display only recognizes that the RAM speed is 1600 MHz? Without a measurement you cannot be certain but since the Mentest failed, I suspect not.


Ciao.

Mar 21, 2013 10:41 AM in response to OGELTHORPE

Ah, very interesting about speed and reliability of RAM! I didn't know that. Where can I read more? Thanks!


Very interesting about testing whether it actually runs at 1600MHz... so how can I measure that? (Just out of curiousity before returning the modules.)



OGELTHORPE wrote:


There are many instances where Apple has released a MBP model where initially the maximum RAM that can be supported has changed after the release. This is usually attributable due to the fact that lager capacity RAM chips were either not available or were not thoroughly tested at the time on order to be considered sufficiently reliable.


Interesting, so do you think that once 32GB comes out (2x16GB) at 1333MHz, it'll be compatible with my Late 2011 MacBook Pro? (Not that I need it... yet haha)

Jan 15, 2014 8:54 AM in response to Rudolfensis

Hey guys!


I have a 13-inch MacBook Pro (early 2011) and wanted to upgrade from 4GB Ram to 8GB Ram so I bought at Amazon 2 x 4GB Corsair 1060 DDR3 1333Mhz. The specs were exactly like recommended by Apple but I had several memory crashes along the way so I decided to get rid of them and buy directly from Apple which cost me 60% more but since it's'Apple, I thought this was the price for not having to worry about it anymore.


I will give you guys details that might not matter in this case, but I'll tell you any way cause sometimes problems are hidden on very small details.


So I had a long 6 months period of happyness with my new memory set working extremely well with no crashes whatsoever until I upgraded my OS to Mavericks. One day I was importing pics from my iPhone to Aperture and sudenly realized I was importing videos as well. So I decided to stop the process and the machine got frozen. I tried to force Aperture to quit, but it didn't appear on the list of programs currently running. Than the computer showed that gray screen with multiple languages and after 2 seconds restarted by itself.


When the OS was loading, a progress bar appeared on the bottom of the screen but as soon as it reached someting around 20% of its length, it shut down the machine. So I restarted and it happened the same thing over and over (5 or 6 times) until I decided to start with Otion on to engage the disk utility. Once I did, the disk utility said it could not be repaired so I had to back up as many files I could and reinstall the OS-X. Since I had all my data backed up on time capsule, I decided to run a fresh install of Mavericks (I had just upgraded by then). After I did, I went to recover my files from timecapsule and, for my suprise, data got corrupted to I had to run Disk Drill to recover the data. I did, but the computer got all funky, crashing all the time. I ran disk utility for like 3 times and had the same inconsistencies than before, even with tons of permission problems.


I decided to reinstall Mavericks again from scratch and I'm having bad memory results on memoy tests. The disk utility is now ok, so nothing wrong with my disk, but the memory seems to be the problem now. Please give me a light about what am I facing ro some possibilities of what I should do.


Thanks!!

Marcos

This thread has been closed by the system or the community team. You may vote for any posts you find helpful, or search the Community for additional answers.

Did my Mac really fail this memory test? (Memtest 4.22)

Welcome to Apple Support Community
A forum where Apple customers help each other with their products. Get started with your Apple Account.