FW800 is NOT 5 or 10 times the speed of USB 2.0.
FW800 is, also, NOT as fast as the internal bus speed of your computer and your computer's internal hard drive.
FW800 is only a little more than 2 times faster than USB 2.0.
USB 2.0 theoretically tops out at around 42-44 Mbps data throughput.
Real world is that USB 2.0 data speeds top out at between 36-38 Mbps.
This data throughput is also non-contiguous using USB 2.0.
Meaning with USB 2.0, data is transferred in packets and in spurts of data,
Data transfer IS slower using this method of transfer in USB 2.0 connection applications.
The somewhat "good news" with older USB 2.0 drives is that if used with a USB 3.0 interface, that USB 2.0 drive will get slightly faster and will reach/get to the 42-44 Mbps data throughput threshold when operating through a USB 3.0 data connection.
And this is when still using mechanically spinning hard drives.
With regards to mechanically spinning hard drives, FW800's theoretically tops out at between 84-86 Mbps.
The data throughput speeds with both FW400 (theoretical 48 Mbps data throughput, real world thoughout of about 40-42 Mbps) and FW800 are faster, also, as data is transferred as both one continuous and contiguous stream of data. No use of short spurts of contiguous packets of data.
FireWire transfers data a one long continuous linear stream of data.
THAT is the REAL difference between USB 1 and 2 with regards to FireWire.
USB 3.0 protocol, I believe, changed to an all continous data chain throughput, now, putting USB 3.0 and USB-C on the same data transfer throughput "level" as Thunderbolt 1/2.
Thunderbolt is still way faster, though, and can also be used for video signals and supporting other video monitors. USB 3.0 does not support using it for video monitor support.
I now run my older FW800 equipped iMac from a FW800 enclossd SSD and now see data throughput speeds through FW800 surpass this 84-86 Mbps "limitation" at an average of 90-94 Mbps, now.
This is very a noticeable and welcome surprise, if only a 10% increase in data throughput over FW800.
The old throughput limitations of USB 2.0/FW 400/800 must have been caused by delays impossd by the mechanical nature of conventional hard drives.
Delays caused by read/write head movements, spinning up and down of drive data platters, data seek times, etc.
So, such mechanical delays in an SSD.