You can make a difference in the Apple Support Community!

When you sign up with your Apple Account, you can provide valuable feedback to other community members by upvoting helpful replies and User Tips.

Looks like no one’s replied in a while. To start the conversation again, simply ask a new question.

Firewire 800 to USB 3.0 adapter?

I have a mid-2010 iMac that has a Firewire 800 and USB 2.0 ports (and no Thunderbolt port--though apparently I bought an iMac right before they started including them).


A lot of the external hard drives I'm buying now have USB 3.0 ports, but no Firewire ports. Is there an adapter that would connect my FIrewire 800 port to a USB 3.0 port on an external hard drive, AND take advantage of the extra speed offered by the Firewire 800 port? In other words, right now I'm just connecting the USB 3.0 external drives to the USB 2.0 ports on my iMac, and file transfers are at the painfully-slow USB 2.0 speeds. I'd like to connect them in a way that would take full advantage of the speed capability of my Firewire 800 port.


Thanks for any advice.

iMac (27-inch Mid 2010), OS X Mountain Lion (10.8.3), Two internal drives (one SSB)

Posted on Apr 10, 2013 12:10 AM

Reply
69 replies

Jul 12, 2013 1:52 PM in response to varjak paw

I realize this is all somewhat off topic, but I had to say something to clarify the statement that "the items listed for the Seagate drive are for that drive only". This is untrue - the variosu GoFlex options are all just direct plug SATA adapters.


The Seagate GoFlex adapters are self-contained SATA to USB, SATA to FireWire or SATA to Thunderbolt bridges. The bare GoFlex drive, of whatever generation, is nothing more than a 2.5" or 3.5" SATA hard drive in an enclosure that exposes the power and data ports on the back of the drive.


The 2.5" GoFlex adapters supply power to a 2.5" drive through FireWire, USB or Thunderbolt directly, while the 3.5" adapter is a larger base which supplies power to a 3.5" drive via a wall wart.


I have regularly used both the 2.5" USB 3.0 and 2.5" FireWire 800 adapters interchangeably with Seagate and bare SATA drives, both rotational and solid-state, and they are perfectly adequate to interface bare 2.5" drives with the arbitrary host system of your choice.


The 3.5" GoFlex bases supply less reliable DC power and Seagate has also shipped a large number of high failure rate and DOA drives in the 3.5" GoFlex kits. I would stay away from those.


Kind regards,


Nathan Phoenix

Aug 7, 2013 4:17 AM in response to Nathan Phoenix

Nathan

I'm still confused. I looked at the image of the Seagate adapter and it looks very specialised. (http://www.seagate.com/external-hard-drives/desktop-hard-drives/backup-plus-desk /)


I have 1TB drives (eg the WD Passport) that are USB3.0 but at the other end of the cable, they only have standard USB2.0 plugs. I'm in the same boat at the OP (JD Lee) in that my iMac has 2 x firewire and 3 x USB2.0 ports.


Is there some way I can make use of the faster USB3.0 transfer rate on the portable drives - or make use of the firewire connectivity on the back of the Mac?


Cheers.

Aug 15, 2013 5:12 AM in response to MichelPM

MichelPM wrote:


Unfortunately, this is not possible.

A little research on your part would've revealed that FW 800/400 drives are available.

Google's your friend.

You can buy hard drives that have FireWire 800/400 connections on them.

Three that come to mind is

LaCie

OWC (macsales.com) Mercury Pro line of hard drives.

NewerTech.

I have found, in my experiences, that most users buy USB drives because they are cheaper.

USB drives do not have a consistent, continuous streaming of data that FireWire drives have.

In real life, this tends to make FireWire drives data throughput faster.

That is why drives with FireWire connections tend to be more expensive.



Unfortunately, your comments re: speed are not correct.

A little research on your part would have revealed that USB 3.0 is faster in every way (sustained transfer rates included) than firewire 800. This is why apple dropped FW800.

Google's your friend:


http://youtu.be/ZqNWYVJqj3E?t=3m51s

http://youtu.be/t4jiEY1JgOI?t=1m16s


I'm a video editor and also deal with multi track audio so consistent transfer rates are all I'm interested in. I can confirm these results on multiple machines (and both macs and pcs) as can anyone who has used both. I didn't think there was any need to respond to the OP's very polite question in the patronising way you did, but if you do I'd suggest getting your own facts straight first.


Additionally the reason firewire is more expensive is simply because it never became a mass market thing due to initial excessive licensing fees: http://firewireexpert.blogspot.com.au/2009/05/dollar-deal-that-almost-killed-fir ewire.html. Not because of the design of the interface.

Aug 15, 2013 5:52 AM in response to menathor

usb is a pulling 1 master many slave system that intel made


firewire is a multimaster non pulling system which is based on the signaling protocol of old Scsi


typically firewire would use a lot less cpu time then usb and firewire 400 would in real world performance have a much higher sustained transfer rate then usb 2 even though it was 480Mbit/sec vs. firewires 400Mbit/sec


transferring a system such as firewire to usb3 would likely result in such a huge overhead of converting it could even end up being as slow as usb2 anyway

and would require maybe AC power and so much action conversion it would cost an arm and a leg


this one is your best bet for usb3 on a mac without usb3 ports

http://store.apple.com/us/product/HB865ZM/A/belkin-thunderbolt-express-dock


because thunderbolt is pretty much a displayport signal multiplexed with pci-express and that mean making a converter would be close to as easy as making a pci-express usb3 board


but that does not mean this belkin product is cheap 😝

Nov 11, 2013 3:46 PM in response to RandomMacGuy

RandomMacGuy,


Sorry to disappoint, but the NitroAV hub/repeater is just that, a hub/repeater, not a "USB 3.0 to FireWire 800" anything.


It's just a USB 3.0 hub and a FireWire repeater together in the same case. It does not perform any conversion or bridging between the two protocols, and it requires both USB 3.0 and FireWire connections to the host computer. USB and FireWire devices remain on two independent peripheral networks.


The NitroAV hub/repeater may be a convenience for some users, as it reduces the number of black boxes on the desk, but it is not an adapter and would not allow a device with only a FireWire port to use USB 3.0 devices, or vice versa.


Nathan

Nov 11, 2013 4:07 PM in response to Csound1

BTW, to CSound1,



Yes. USB3 ports are blue.



Not always. This is a convension but not a standard, as is the presence of the initials "SS" for "SuperSpeed". USB 3.0 or 3.1 ports may meet one or both visual conventions, or (sometimes) neither. As an example, see section 4 of Apple Knowledgebase article HT5172 (http://support.apple.com/kb/HT5172#4):


Some USB computer ports have a blue insert. Why don't I see blue inserts on my Mac's USB ports?

Some manufacturers use a blue insert to designate a USB 3 port or device. All USB ports on Macs that supports USB 3 are USB 3 capable and do not have blue inserts.


Apple has since adopted the blue insert convention on at least some machines, but I do not know off the top of my head which ones may still have unmarked ports. The best way to be sure on models from transitional years is to look at the USB section of the System Profiler report.


You can determine whether a port is USB 1.0/2.0 or 3.0 by visual inspection, however. USB 3.0 ports contain an extra set of five recessed contacts (consisting of two differential pairs and one ground) which are visible above the legacy USB pins, as shown here:



User uploaded file



USB 3.x consists in reality of two discrete buses. One is a legacy USB 1.x/2.x bus (using the four standard pins). The other, USB 3.x specific bus is a physically separate, full duplex channel using the five new pins as seen above. USB 3.x devices are mandated to fall back to USB 2.x function if no 3.x bus is found, but the data transfer methods are entirely different between the two protocols, with USB 3.x using high speed differential signalling more like SATA.


I hope this helps.


Nathan

Nov 11, 2013 4:27 PM in response to RandomMacGuy

Seagate does make an adapter that allows some of it's drives to switch from USB 3.0 to FW800. However, it is just that. It is a switch. You pull the USB 3.0 interface off the drive, and attach a FW800 interface. I bought these, and lived to fully regret doing so. They were a nightmare. My drives kept getting corrupted, and I couldn't figure it out. I had clones, so I kept transferring terabytes of data back and forth via FW800, which took forever.


Eventually I talked to someone at Seagate who told me the interfaces were the problem. They had released updated firmware for the drives to make them work (supposedly), but had done nothing to publicize the fact. So I gave up on the interfaces altogether. And I hate Seagate now. They cost me days of productivity.

Firewire 800 to USB 3.0 adapter?

Welcome to Apple Support Community
A forum where Apple customers help each other with their products. Get started with your Apple Account.