Romko,
romko23 wrote:
…I take it you don't do any updating of your apps? Support for Tiger is almost near nil, while Leopard is holding on. On my G5 Quad, like yours.. I have no problems running Leopard at all and its fast and lightning quick. Why is it not so quick on your system?
Obviously there are applications I use that will not run under Tiger, most notably Photoshop 13.0.4 ("CS6"), but then they don't run under Leopard either. 😀
So that factor doesn't militate in favor of Leopard at all. 10.5.x has way too many disadvantages and glaring faults, as I found out after using it for a few months. It dropped Classic support and totally broke SCSI.
I have way too much money invested in irreplaceable and un-upgradeable custom software that runs only in straight Mac OS 9.2 or Classic, and a sizable investment in SCSI hardware too, including a high-end tabloid-size Epson 836XL graphic-arts scanner that originally cost somewhere between $6,000 and $10,000 (have to look that up, as it's been a long time) and which could only be replaced by a $3,000 modern Large Format Epson 11000XL PS unit that's not built nearly as rugged. There's also my Nikon film and negative scanner, etc.
For Photoshop 13.0.4 and ACR 8.1, which are 64-bit only, I have been running a Snow Leopard 10.6.8 system on a dinky Mac Book with 4 GB of RAM, of which applications can only see 3 GB. I share my keyboard, mouse and tablet—as well as my dual, side-by-side 22" CRT monitors—between the Snow Leopard Mac Book and the PPC G5 Quad.
Fortunately, over the weekend I have also acquired—for peanuts—an Apple Mac Pro (1,1) Xeon 2.66 GHz Quad-Core (2006) with 13 GB of RAM, upgradeable to 32 GB, and that will replace the Intel Mac Book. It should be a huge improvement over the puny Mac Book, or so I hope.
In any event, I have yet to decide whether to run the new Mac Prom when it arrives in the course of the next week, under Lion (reluctantly if I'm forced to) or under Snow Leopard, which is way more likely. At any rate, it will not be under Leopard, which doesn't support Photoshop13.0.x, and the machine can't even run Mountain Lion.
I don't need any of the features of Leopard at all. You may remember that I have both the intrusive Spotblight and the Dashboard permanently disabled under Tiger, and in the Snow Leopard system I have Time Machine disabled. That is also the case in with my Leopard boot volume, which, as I've just mentioned, have not needed to boot in a very, very long time,
Incidentally, I never said Leopard wasn't quick on my G5 Quad. What I've said, and I'll reaffirm this any time, is that Tiger is definitely snappier, faster and more efficient on the very same machine. There's not the slightest doubt in my mind about this.
The end result is that I have no incentive to run Leopard and, therefore, I cannot in good conscience recommend that OS to anyone on a PPC G5 Quad—if they have the option to run Tiger instead.
I realize that Leopard is required for things like iDisk and the iTunes stores, but I have no interest in any of that myself.
romko23 wrote:
…Then again I have a Nvidia Geforce 7800GTX 512MB card and 12GB of DDR2 memory. Perhaps if you upgraded the video card and memory maybe Leopard then would make you want to go to it and drop Tiger…
LOL !
Hah! You're way out of line. I have 16 GB of RAM on my PPC G5 Quad, Romko, and have the most powerful video card you can get for a G5 Quad: the very same, mutant, flashed 550MHz nVidia GeForce 7800GTX 1,700MHz 512MB VRAM. 😎
Drop Tiger? When shrimp learn how to whistle ! 😀